Several to-be-participants of the sit-in protest at Hong Lim Park have issued a statement on their views on the process of the elected presidency and also their concerns over the comments made over Mdm Halimah Yacob’s appointment as the Elected President being the sole candidate who received the Certificate of Eligibility from the Presidential Election Committee.

Below is their statement in full and the link for their statement.

On 13 September 2017, Mdm Halimah Yacob was declared Singapore’s 8th President.

In any other circumstance, the election of our first Malay woman President—who had also previously served as the deputy secretary-general of the National Trades Union Congress, and Speaker of Parliament, amongst other capacities—would have been celebrated as a progressive step for Singapore society.

However, the recent changes to the rules of the Presidential Election have generated disappointment and outrage.

We are aware that discontent is being expressed through a sit-in called Silent Sit-In Protest #NotMyPresident that will be held at Hong Lim Park’s Speakers’ Corner on 16 September (Saturday) at 4.30pm. This sends a clear signal that there is a significant proportion of Singaporeans who regard the so-called “hiatus-triggered model” as deeply undemocratic and politically motivated.

To that end, we will be attending this sit-in as an expression of sharing in the disappointment and outrage of the attendees and other Singaporeans.

However, we would like to clarify and urge that our disappointment and outrage should be pointed specifically to the political process and not towards Mdm Halimah Yacob’s character.

That is,

  1.  We reject the “hiatus-triggered model” as undemocratic and degrading of the elected office
  2.  We are disappointed with the Presidential Election Committee’s direct decision to disqualify the two other potential candidates, and indirect declaration of a walkover
  3.  We are against the recent tightening of the eligibility criteria for private sector candidates which disqualifies various competent citizens from serving the office
  4.  We question Mdm Halimah Yacob’s presidency to be sufficiently independent given the functions of the Elected President, and her affiliation to the People’s Action Party (PAP) terminated only in August 2017

In addition to these objections against the political process:

  1.   We do not wish to question Mdm Halimah Yacob’s qualifications, capabilities, gender, or racial identity as relevant to her execution of duties in the office.
  2. We disapprove of any rejection of her presidency which resorts to character assassinations, and/ or questioning of her identity, as short-sighted and unfair.
  3.  We are expressing our reservations regarding the hashtag #NotMyPresident as it might be used to make attacks on Mdm Halimah Yacob’s character, and suggest that we instead focus on the unfair political processes behind this walkover.

We, the signatories, recognise the great outpour of feelings and ask that it be directed to its source: the government’s undemocratic proposals and failure to consult the Singaporean people on matters of national importance. Any accusations made towards Mdm Halimah Yacob distract from the broader political forces behind her election.

With these concerns in mind, we urge everyone to attend the Silent Sit-In Protest as a means of registering our frustrations and disappointments. If you are a Singaporean or Permanent Resident (PR) who would like to express solidarity with our principles, please indicate your name on the following Google form: https://goo.gl/forms/MVNuvqxC5xoLUsm62

[toggle title=”Signatories”] Shawn Hoo
Anthea Chua
Yogesh Tulsi
Rachel Ooi
Swarnima Sircar
Saza Faradilla
Kwok Yingchen
Jiang Haolie
Paul Jerusalem
Jay Wong Cai Jie
Tsoi Sau Yee
Natalie Sutanto
Herman Lim
Gilbert Goh
Benny Phang
Kwan Zhaoting
Neo Albert
Salina Bte Rahiman
Abdul Aziz Bin Hussain
Sasha Aman
Koh Wei Jie
Joy Yang
Ng Qi Siang
Hellen Sebestian
Tan JY
Yap Xin Ran
Sharan Kaur Sambhi
Tan Heng Yeng
Tan Hwee Peng
Naomi Lourdesamy
Tan Yan Ru
Muhammad Faris Bin Joraimi
Gabriel Tng
Cephas Tan
Wong Kong Shing
Rakesh Prabhakaran
Elsie Lee
Siying
Arunima Sircar
Mock Tian Qi Annika

[/toggle]

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Protection for workers needed: HOME on COI report

The Humanitarian Organisation for Migration Economics (HOME) said that adequate protection for migrant workers is…

Joseph Nathan: 李显龙正为自己寻找“大出口”?

译自:Joseph Nathan脸书贴文 “大手笔支出”(BIG SPENDING),似乎已成为目前人民行动党(PAP)的新标志。从奢华的200年周年纪念,到更奢华的国庆群众大会晚宴(National Day Rally),他们不再像以前的“护国先贤”那样,认真接触老百姓和谨慎开支人民血汗钱。 诚然,部分金钱已用在回馈建国与立国一代,但与他们的报酬和福利相比,这些“少许的派息”就如同小小的花生一般微乎其微。 尽管有消费税折扣券和水电费回扣,但对比最近的水电费涨幅便可知道,我们需要付出多少,又有多少是可回扣的。尽管降幅缓慢,但我们的购买力确实在下降。为此,贫穷与劳工阶级只会愈来愈穷。故,为什么我们还要选择一个根本不管我们死活的领导人? 即使我们可以原谅人民行动党,未能实现瑞士生活水平的承诺,我不知道他们否也忘了,曾答应新加坡人民,为我们创造一个利益相关者经济的承诺,让每位人民能够从我们富有成功的经济,获取均等的派息。然而,直到今日,我们的前总统陈庆炎已退休卸任都还未兑现,我想问我们还可以问谁关于这“未兑现”的承诺? 尽管多年来他们一直误判,导致他们不得不补上其他政策。但最近,我们几乎可看见每位部长正为自己的政策贴上“实惠”(affordable)的标签,再重新包装成为“成功事迹”,难道这些“实惠”的标签就成为他们的新的护身符吗? 我无法理解的是,为何没有一个第四代政客(the 4G…

ICA puts officer to work in front line processing arrival clearance despite he can’t be vaccinated

On Sunday (2 May), the Ministry of Health (MOH) said that one…