Civil Society
Amnesty International: Investigation into peaceful assembly is Singapore’s latest effort to intimidate human rights defenders
Amnesty International, a non-governmental organization focused on human rights, issued a statement on Friday to raise concerns over the ongoing police investigation of ten anti-death penalty activists for participating in a vigil outside Changi Prison and called it as a latest attempt to intimidate human rights defenders in Singapore.
Below is the full statement by Amnesty International:
The police investigation of ten anti-death penalty activists solely for participating in a vigil outside Changi Prison is the latest attempt to intimidate human rights defenders in Singapore.
Police officers informed Kirsten Han, Jolovan Wham, Terry Xu and Jason Soo and at least six others by letter that they are being investigated for “taking part in a public assembly without a permit” under Section 16(2)(a) of the Public Order Act after holding a vigil for Prabagaran Srivijayan, a Malaysian national sentenced to death and executed on 14 July.
On the eve of his execution, anti-death penalty activists as well as friends and family of Prabagaran gathered outside Changi prison, where they held a candlelight vigil and displayed pictures of him. Police officers subsequently informed the group that they could not light candles and confiscated the candles and photographs.
The human rights activists have stated that they complied with these orders and handed the candles and photographs over to the police. According to them, the police permitted the group to remain outside the prison provided they did not light any more candles, and did not further interfere with the gathering.
Public assemblies are subject to heavy restrictions in Singapore. The Public Order Act, first promulgated in 2009, regulates public talks, religious assemblies and political protests. In April 2017, amendments to the Act gave police and other officials further powers to unduly restrict or ban peaceful protests and increased the risks of criminalizing peaceful assembly.
Apart from investigation by police, the human rights defenders are also subject to an arbitrary travel ban, preventing them from leaving the country. On 6 September, Terry Xu was stopped by immigration officials as he attempted to cross into Malaysia at the Woodlands Checkpoint and told by the investigating officer that he was banned from international travel.
There was no information provided with regards to the duration of the travel ban or if it would be lifted once the investigations were completed.
The imposition of arbitrary travel bans is in contravention of the right to freedom of movement. Article 13(2) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states: “Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.”
Travel bans against human rights defenders further stigmatize their work and stifle the rights to freedom of expression and association.
Amnesty International calls on Singapore authorities to guarantee the rights to freedom of expression, peaceful assembly, association and movement by ending all investigations on human rights defenders related to their peaceful activism and immediately removing the arbitrary travel restrictions imposed on them. In addition, the organisation calls for the government to repeal or amend all restrictive laws which limit public assembly, including Section 16 of the Public Order Act and bring laws and policies into line with international standards.
-
Singapore6 days ago
Purported resignation message from Li Hongyi as Singpass director goes viral; GovTech yet to confirm authenticity
-
Community4 days ago
PAP MP Edward Chia: ‘Sanctions on Israel do not work’ when confronted by Holland-Bukit Timah resident
-
Singapore6 days ago
Lee Hsien Yang alleges rising repression and corruption in Singapore; government calls claims a ‘personal vendetta
-
Comments2 weeks ago
8World News anchor Zhang Haijie faces criticism for labelling Lee Hsien Yang as ‘unfilial son’
-
Politics2 weeks ago
Singapore govt accuses Lee Hsien Yang of creating ‘false urgency’ over 38 Oxley Road demolition
-
Opinion1 week ago
Where does Lee Hsien Loong stand on the future of 38 Oxley Road as the government revisits the issue?
-
Politics1 week ago
Charles Yeo claims Singapore is seeking his extradition from UK; AGC remains silent
-
Opinion2 weeks ago
Where is the iron in Lawrence Wong? Hiding from direct response to Lee Hsien Yang?