MRT statistics won’t restore public confidence?
I refer to the article “Statistics alone won’t restore confidence in MRT” (thenewpaper, Aug 19).
It states that “Singapore University of Social Sciences (SUSS) economist and senior lecturer Walter Theseira said it is quite difficult for the public to reconcile their train disruption experiences with the statistics provided by the Government, which claims that overall rail reliability has improved”.
Mainstream media was late by 23 days?
Why did it take about 23 days for the mainstream media to as I believe to the best of my knowledge – to write about how ridiculous the statistics announced by the Government on 27 July was – that “the MRT system’s reliability has improved by three times since Mr Khaw Boon Wan moved to the Transport Ministry in 2015, but the minister wants to raise the bar much higher”? (“Khaw Boon Wan sets new rail network reliability target as MRT becomes three times as dependable as in 2015” (Straits Times, Jul 27)
Social media vs mainstream media?
Social media was then all abuzz about how ridiculous such a claim was.
For example:
Straits Times then reported back in July that Minister of Transport, Mr Khaw Boon Wan said that based on preliminary data, mean km between failure (MKBF) has happily gone up to nearly 400,000 (393,000) train-km in the first half of this year (2017). However, Mr Khaw said that the data had excluded delays arising from the testing of a new signalling system on the North-South line.
By excluding the “delays arising from the testing of a new signalling system”, we have conveniently evaded all the frequent and extensive delays that have happened recently.
151st Press Freedom Ranking
So, arguably – this may yet be another example of why our Press Freedom ranking is 151st in the world!
Better late than never?
Perhaps it was waiting for a major MRT breakdown during the examination period on 18 August to stir itself to action and report on the obvious, albeit about three weeks late!
