According to Straits Times, the independent panel which was appointed to Aljunied-Hougang Town Council (AHTC) in consultation with Housing Development Board on Feb 2017, is taking several of the town councillor to court over a breach of fiduciary duties.

ST wrote that AHTC is claiming $622,593.78 in liquidated claims from multiple parties, as well as $4,167,501.71 in unliquidated claims. Additional sums may be involved. The writ of summons was filed last Friday by the town council in the High Court.

The six defendants listed in the case are Workers’ Party (WP) Secretary-General Low Thia Khiang, the town council’s chairman, Mr Pritam Singh, its vice-chairman, Ms Sylvia Lim, Mr Chua Zhi Hon, Mr Kenneth Foo, deputy organising secretary of the WP and Ms How Weng Fan, owner of the town council’s former managing agent firm FM Solutions and Services (FMSS); and FMSS.

It is said that the legal action was initiated as part of the work of a panel tasked with looking into improper payments made by AHTC.

HDB had earlier instructed AHTC to appoint a suitable third party to recover improper payments after a KMPG report (dated Oct 31, 2016) detailed improper payments totalling around S$1.5 million, of which KPMG said at least S$600,000 ought to be recovered.

In a letter to AHTC dated 4 Nov, HDB said that it was “imperative that immediate steps be taken to recover the improper payments”, including legal action where necessary. “As the improper payments may give rise to personal claims against existing town councillors, a suitable third party should have charge and conduct of these proceedings, on the town council’s behalf,”

According to the terms of reference for the independent panel, it has the power to commence legal action on behalf of the town council for overpayments and payments without proper certification of work being done, among others.

The panel’s other powers also include (and not limited to) the present ongoing arbitrations between AHTC and its former Managing Agent, FMSS.

The independent panel is chaired by senior counsel Philip Jeyaretnam, and comprises senior counsel N. Sreenivasan and KPMG managing partner Ong Pang Thye.

According to ST, another writ of summons was also filed by AHTC in the High Court against FMSS last Friday in relation to an arbitration case over a financial dispute emerging from the lapses at the town council.

 

When Ms Lim was asked for a response in regards to the claims filed by AHTC, she replied that they will respond further shortly, after they have studied the claim.

A pre-trial conference date of Aug 31 has been listed.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

TODAY letter… published with a new paragraph sender did not write

The following was first published as a Facebook note on Stephanie Chok’s…

Six PSP members and reporter had details taken by safe distancing officer during walkabout, after allegedly reported by member of public

Six members of the Progress Singapore Party (PSP) and a reporter from…

On the culling of wild boars at Lower Pierce – a geographical perspective

By Chen Jinwen If wildness can stop being (just) out there and…

内政部驳斥针对马国囚犯批评 指我国法律前人人平等

内政部否认针对马来西亚囚犯执行死刑的指控,并强调我国法律是同等对待所有人,无论罪犯是本地人或外国人。 当局是针对马国媒体报导指,我国数次拒绝了对被判处死刑的马国毒犯给予宽大请愿一事,做出回应。 内政部发言人于周末(7月13日)回复媒体询问时指出,“所有到访或居住在新加坡的外国人都必须遵守我们的法律,如果他们选择违反我国法律,就必须准备接受法律对付”。 “我国拥有强大的法治力量和独立的司法制度。无论是什么国籍,只要是违法者,包括被判处死刑的罪犯,均依据法律进行正当程序。” 内政部指出,当一名罪犯被判处死刑时,他可以向我国总统提交请愿书,而这将根据其特殊情况或优势进行仔细考量。 至于已经提交的请愿书,总统会在《宪法》第22条文下,根据内阁的建议,决定是否给予刑事宽恕权。《宪法》第22条例规定了给予赦免的规章。 内政部指出,每个国家都有决定,根据各别情况行驶死刑的主权。当然,我国继续使用死刑的决定,也受到国内外维护人权团体的批评。 “根据正当的法律程序强制执行死刑,并没有达到国际共识……我国尊重其他国家决定自家法律制度的主权行使,也期望获得同样的回报。” 马国媒体于上周五(7月12日)报导,指该国四名毒犯的请愿书被拒绝,目前在樟宜监狱面临死刑。 据马来西亚捍卫自由律师团(Lawyers for Liberty)发文告指出,该四名囚犯,也在10名向总统申请特赦的囚犯行列。…