Mr Ashok Kumar Mipuri, Singapore’s ambassador to the United States has issued a rebuttal to an article that was published by the New York Times about the Lee family saga on 4 July 2017, stating that “there is no national crisis in Singapore.”

The NYT article entitled, “Dispute Over Singapore Founder’s House Becomes a National Crisis” covered the allegations that Dr Lee Weiling and Mr Lee Hsien Yang had made against Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong in June and commented that the dispute over the fate of 38 Oxley Road has “shattered Singapore’s image as an orderly authoritarian ideal and hinted at deeper divisions about its political future.”

Mr Mipuri’s letter criticized the article for promoting the absurd notion that Singaporeans link the legitimacy of their government with the fate of Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s house. The NYT time had written that “just as it was difficult to separate Mr. Lee from the country he built, it is impossible to erase the politics from the house. Preserving it would provide a physical reminder not only of Mr. Lee, analysts said, but also of the current prime minister’s connection to him.” and quoted Li Shengwu, Lee Hsien Yang’s son saying that the People’s Action Party viewed the house as a symbol of their legacy and a symbol uniquely associated with them which gives the party legitimacy.

The article further quotes from individuals such as Kirsten Han, an activist and freelance journalist and Sinapan Samydorai, the director of Southeast Asian affairs at Think Center, who noted that the issues arising from the saga is far more than a simple family dispute but a question of whether the Prime Minister abused his political power.

In his letter, the ambassador parroted Ministers on how PM Lee has made a full statement in Parliament against his siblings’ accusations and explained how he had recused himself from all government decisions concerning the house.

Mr Mipuri further states that “no Member of Parliament made any allegations of impropriety or wrongdoing against the PM during the debate, nor has anyone else produced specific evidence to back the siblings’ vague allegations.” Something which the PM Lee and other Ministers have also said in Parliament during the Parliamentary debate on 3 and 4 July.

While the letter from Mr Mipuri was published on 11 July, but the letter that was published by Channel News Asia shows it to be dated on 8 July.

Mr Mirpuri’s letter is reproduced in full below: 

To the Editor:

Family Dispute Over House of Singapore’s Founder Erupts as National Crisis” (news article, July 5) promotes the absurd notion that Singaporeans link the legitimacy of their government to the fate of former Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew’s house.

In response to accusations by his siblings of abuse of power over the house, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong made a full statement in Parliament. He explained how he had recused himself from all government decisions concerning the house, and also sold the house to his brother, so that he no longer has any interest or influence over the house.

No member of Parliament made any allegations of impropriety or wrongdoing against the prime minister during the debate, nor has anyone else produced specific evidence to back the siblings’ vague allegations. There is no national crisis in Singapore.

ASHOK KUMAR MIRPURI
WASHINGTON

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Alternative Housing Policy to Boost Total Fertility Rate

SDP Press Release Singapore faces a grave and urgent problem of a…

Coronavirus: Taiwan poised to become the world’s second-largest mask producer

Taiwan projects to produce 10 million masks per day and poised to…

清寒子弟欠费领不到成绩单正本 教育部澄清吁家长正视义务

此前,社运份子吴家和在脸书分享,有清寒子弟因家里经济状况因素,学校费用未缴清,致使他们只能领取小六会考(PSLE)成绩单的影印本,幸得善心人士解围,才顺利获得成绩单正本。 对此,教育部透过媒体澄清,有关学生仍能继续申请中学入学,不过也证实,若学费未缴清,有关学生只能拿到影印本而不是成绩单正本,且这是该部“一贯的政策。” 该部表示,此事无关乎“回收款项”,并解释考量到教育费大部分都是公共拨款,那么基于一项原则,大家仍能共同承担和正视义务,不管这些费用多小。该部希望家长们一同来强化此举带出的意义。 教育部续而解释,有关家长近两年未缴付杂费,也没有提出任何经济援助申请。 教育部又补充,每年为每位小学生补助约1万2000新元,分担下每个学生每月仅付13元杂费。该部强调低收入家庭可以申请财务援助,来减轻制服、课本、交通、学校伙食和学杂费等负担。 “贴文旨在质问教育部的价值” 事实上,在吴家和的贴文,也提出教育部已竭尽所能提供所有学生帮助,但仍会有需要帮助的“落单”群体。 但教育部指出,经济状况不应成为孩子成长的绊脚石,而教育机构的首要任务是确保学生成长和发挥潜能。 该部认为吴家和的贴文旨在“质问教育部的意图和价值”,也反问教育者、家长和群众,来决定教育部的决策是否公平和具有教育意义。 一些网民在《亚洲新闻台》的脸书留言,教育部奉行上述政策许久,有者现身说法,指孩子小六会考时自己正好有些财务拮据;孩子领到成绩单影印本,不过老师并没有大事宣扬。最后自己向校方申请财务援助。 但也有网民要求大家停止责怪有关清寒家庭的家长,“你们对他们的处境有深入了解吗?他们很可能正是落单的群体?又或者他们完全不知道有辅助计划可申请?或者是年长者或教育水平低?也不知道面对这些情况该怎么做?”他认为真正的受害者是学生。 网民Low…

MOM will resume entry approvals for work pass holders and their dependants with travel history to higher risk countries from 10 Aug

The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) will resume entry approvals for work pass…