Updates by SMRT state that safety procedures were not followed in the accident on 22 March that resulted in the deaths of two SMRT staff members who were hit by an oncoming train.

If protocol had been correctly followed, all oncoming trains would have had to come to a stop at the site where works were to take place. In order for this to happen, the team would have had to communicate with the signal unit at Pasir Ris station before they reentered the trackway. SMRT acknowledged that their records do not show that this procedure had taken place.

While authorisation was granted for fifteen staff members from the permanent way team and the signal team to move down from the station platform, cross the track, and access the maintenance walkway, no communications were made with the signal unit before they stepped back onto the trackway.

The oncoming train, which was travelling towards Pasir Ris station, was on automatic mode and was going at a speed of 60 km per hour. Once the train captain saw staff on the tracks, emergency breaks were immediately applied, but were not sufficient to prevent the accident.

Both the workers who were hit, Nasrulhudin Najumudin and Muhammad Asyraf Ahmad Buhari, were pronounced dead at the scene of the accident by paramedics. Both workers were undergoing on-the-job training at the time of accident.

SMRT said in a statement that investigations are being conducted and that they are working closely with the police and the Ministry of Manpower.

SMRT Chief Executive Officer Desmond Kuek also said in a press conference following the accident that SMRT was in the process of obtaining detailed accounts of the incident from witnesses.

SMRT have also stated that they will take full responsibility for the unfortunate incident.

The full statement and timeline of events by SMRT can be found here.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Report made to ROS on home for aged being used by PAP for political purpose

Mr Ravi Philemon, director of an non-governmental organisation, has filed a report…

Former NUS law professor takes court action against Singapore government to reinstate his Singapore PR status

The former tenured law professor of the National University of Singapore (NUS),…

早到却还没人上班意义何在? 国大民调冀检讨“早鸟票”优惠价值

民调发现,比起更快捷的巴士服务,上班族更愿意乘坐地铁,因为它比巴士服务更稳定,不会受到天气或道路交通状况所影响。 该项民调由国大执行,研究者发现上班族对于交通工作选择支出较大,对地铁“早鸟票”的价值进行质疑,因此透过分析大量的公共交通数据包括新加坡所有e-zlink 持有者如儿童、学生、成人或老年人,并对此进行筛选,欲提供有效建议增进公共巴士服务。 结果发现,每10位上班族则仅一位搭乘公共巴士,而每10位老年人中,就有近三位是搭乘公共巴士。即便公共巴士在部分路段可能更短、更节省时间,但上班族更倾向选择地铁作为他们的通勤工具,因为比起公共巴士,地铁服务更稳定可靠。 民调更是质疑地铁“早鸟票”优惠的成效。早鸟票优惠旨在鼓励更多通勤者避免高峰时期搭乘,例如于早上7点45分前抵达18个区域的地铁站将会获得免费搭乘,但事实上,优惠的发挥有限,因为上班族对于车票并不在意。 “早到,同事却还没抵达” 国立大学商学院Sumit Agarwal表示,上班族将工作效益置于车票之上,只有在他们所需之时才会提早抵达工作场所。 “如果他们为了开会能够早点抵达,那没关系,可是当他们早到了之后,却发现还没有人上班,那早点抵达的意义何在?” 对此,本地英语媒体《今日报》向陆交局询问,陆交局称优惠计划仍能达到更好分配出行需求,而且在早高峰时段出现7巴仙的变动。 由于优惠的目标相当成功,因此陆交局在2017年推出另项延伸计划:所有通勤者于早上7点45分之前抵达地铁站,将享有0.50元的折扣。目前该项计划每天让33万6000名通勤者收益,猛增12巴仙。 巴士服务比地铁较不稳定,上班族宁搭较贵的地铁…

Politicians from all sides wish Low Thia Khiang well after he was taken to ICU

On Sunday (3 May), the Workers’ Party (WP) announced on its Facebook…