The NUSS Guild Hall in Kent Ridge was the site of much excitement and argument on Tuesday night as representatives of all 10 political parties gathered for a pre-election dialogue.

Moderated by Viswa Sadasivan, Chief Editor of Inconvenient Questions, the dialogue ran over an hour longer than planned as speakers argued issues from immigration to education to democracy. Representatives were Benjamin Pwee from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Steven Chia from the National Solidarity Party (NSP), Sim Ann from the People’s Action Party (PAP), Goh Meng Seng from the People’s Power Party (PPP), Kenneth Jeyaretnam from the Reform Party (RP), Harminder Pal Singh from the Singapore Democratic Alliance (SDA), Paul Tambyah from the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), Tan Jee Say from Singaporeans First (SingFirst), Jeannette Chong-Aruldoss from the Singapore People’s Party (SPP) and Gerald Giam from the Workers’ Party (WP).

Although this isn’t the first time NUSS has organised an election dialogue, this year is the first time the media has been allowed to report on the event. Sadasivan also observed that it was not only the mainstream media that was in attendance, but also alternative online websites.

Much focus was placed on the future, with all parties agreeing that the upcoming election is crucial for Singaporeans to determine the direction in which the country will be headed.

The issue of town council management cropped up during the dialogue following a question posed by the moderator to Gerald Giam about what he wished had been different about the debate over Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council (AHPETC).

Jeannette Chong-Aruldoss also highlighted that lapses had been found within the People’s Association:

However, Sim Ann said that the response within government agencies to lapses had been swift, while questions still remained regarded AHPETC:

Population and transport issues received an airing at the dialogue, as opposition members said the issues of the past election had not been solved:

A question posed from the floor on whether there are trade-offs between democracy and effective governance also received spirited replies:

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

“成本、技术问题”150组屋无法翻新电梯 方荣发:总得要让等待居民知道定案

工人党议员方荣发,昨日(4日)在国会质询,那些无法在电梯翻新计划下受惠的组屋居民,长期以来一直在等待,当局理应尽快为他们带来定案。 在政府50亿元的电梯翻新计划下,仍有150座组屋,因费用、技术或地势等因素,无法进行翻新。 “一些议员也一再在国会里质询,这些组屋在无法参与电梯翻新计划下的命运。我也要求建屋发展局,根据技术问题和成本问题把这些组屋分类。我要求国家发展部分享这数据。” “建屋局的回复也“一直都很一致”,即该局会持续探讨较有成本效率的方案;至于那些因健康或行动不便居民,当局则可协助安排其他的住处。” 然而,方荣发认为,这些居民长期引颈长盼,是否有好消息?还是要搬出去?当局总得要给他们一个定案,任何房地产经纪都会告诉你没有电梯可能很难脱手这类组屋。 他说,此前他询问是否能让居民来决定,是否出钱来获得电梯服务的供应,对此国家发展部长黄循财则指出,一些翻新工程的成本,甚至可达每户逾20万元,足以购买另一间组屋。 方荣发建议,当局应再分散这些翻新成本,因为一些组屋例如后港五道363座只是需要额外的电梯井。他认为应让居民来决定,如何分摊成本。 2018年,李智陞也指未找到解决方案 回溯2018年7月,社会及家庭发展部长兼国家发展部第二部长李智陞,在国会回答工人党议员方荣发提问,同样指建屋局仍未找到克服一些组屋现有局限的解决方案,有约150座组屋未能加入电梯翻新计划。 “在这150座组屋中,约七成因费用方面的考量,不符合翻新条件。无法让居民直接享有电梯服务的组屋,占本地已出售组屋的少于1巴仙。” 今年初,民主党财政林文兴反映西岭115座和119座组屋,只有五楼、九楼和12楼有电梯,对于一些不良于行的人士或年长者十分不便。 对此,负责林景区事务的该区议员王鼎昆,针对此事在《联合早报》回应,指例如115座组屋建在山坡,建筑的格局和地势,为电梯翻新工程增加难度和成本。他担忧两座组屋若翻新电梯预计成本可能超过顶限。…

贸工部:CECA没开方便之门! 让印度国民自动成狮城公民

贸工部发言人重申,新印全面经济合作协议(CECA),并没有让印度国民能自动成为新加坡公民、永久居民,或是自动发出就业准证等。 贸工部称有关说法具误导性,任何通过CECA或其他自贸协议,前来我国工作的外籍人士,都需要符合本地的就业准证条例。 在CECA下,允许跨国公司内部人员调动专才入境,但都要符合本地的条例。 贸工部发言人称,通过该途径来新的就业准证持有者不到五巴仙,通过企业内部调动,到我国工作的外籍人士来自不同国家,印籍人士只占一小部分。 事实上,这已不是该部第一次作出这种澄清声明。早在去年11月,贸工部长陈振声就声称,CECA没给印度国民“开方便之门”,然而为何他的说词至今无法说服国人? 再者,即便故总理兼经济政策统筹部长王瑞杰,也在之前的一次对话会上,承认居民关注樟宜商业园充斥外籍人士的情况。 但即便如此,王瑞杰仍坚称,签署CECA协议是为了创造更多美好生活和工作给新加坡人。

Fatal car accident involving NTU exchange student in Slovakia

A Nanyang Technological University (NTU) student died in Slovakia last Friday (25…

Academics highlight implications of wearable contact tracing devices in this world of “surveillance capitalism”

“If COVID-19 is an opportunity for Singapore to accelerate data collection efforts,…