Ho Ching
[youtube id=”l04ynJ37Cek” align=”center” mode=”normal”]

6 years ago, the intended leadership transition of the Temasek’s Chief Executive Officer between former BHP Billiton chief Charles ‘Chip’ Goodyear and Mdm Ho Ching came to an abrupt stop when the private investment company announced the departure of Goodyear due to differences between him and the board of directors regarding certain strategic issues that could not be resolved.

“Four months into the leadership transition, the Temasek Board and Mr Goodyear have concluded and accepted that there are differences regarding certain strategic issues that could not be resolved. In light of the differences, both parties decided that it is in their mutual interests to terminate the leadership transition process and hence the executive relationship with effect from 15 August 2009. Mr Goodyear will also step down from the Temasek Board effective the same date.” – Temasek Holdings, 21 July 2009

Temasek Chairman, Mr Dhanabalan earlier said, “Ho Ching has been instrumental in bringing Chip on board. We have been working on this appointment for more than a year.” This was when Goodyear was first announced to be taking over the role of CEO from Mdm Ho on 6 February 2009.

He also said that Mr Goodyear shares the vision and values that underpin Temasek as a key Singapore institution and an international investment company. “Chip presents a rare and unusual combination of investment and operational experience that can support the continued transformation of Temasek,”

Mr Dhanabalan, however, clarified that the change of leadership had nothing to do with the billions of dollars of paper losses from recent overseas investments nor the perceived conflict of interest in some quarters arising from Mdm Ho being the wife of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.

Reasons behind the termination of leadership transition

So what happened during the period of less than half a year and what were the differences between Goodyear and the board of directors to have resulted in the departure of the would-be CEO?

Recently leaked cables from the U.S embassy in Singapore published in Wikileaks, gives us a deeper insight into the failed transition. (see here)

It is said, Local analysts confirmed that Goodyear’s proposed changes to the senior management did not do well with the board at Temasek Holdings and that Mdm Ho continued to micro-manage Temasek despite her planned departure.

“Local analysts confirmed to Embassy local press reports suggesting Goodyear left Temasek after his proposed changes to senior management did not go down well with the Board. Also, Goodyear’s reputedly hard questioning of existing investment decisions and plans earned him some rancor among the Temasek investment team, few of whom are reportedly sad to see him depart. Another local economist suggested to Emboff a slightly more sinister reason: that Madam Ho had continued to micro-manage Temasek despite her planned departure, interfering with Goodyear’s transition to the top spot.” – Telegram dated 22 July 2009

Carl Linaburg, co-founder of the Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute in Roseville, Calif said that Goodyear’s departure was bad news for the bad news for the sovereign wealth fund managing company, “Prior to Chip’s arrival, Ho Ching had been widely criticized for Temasek’s major losses in financials. Chip’s departure makes people wonder why Temasek can’t seem to make firm decisions with sound judgment, which is essential for managing the assets of a country.”

This was also mentioned in the leaked telegram that Ho’s resignation at the time was widely considered (despite Temasek denials) to be a result of the fund’s poor performance in 2008 and the need to further internationalize the fund by bringing in foreign talent.

Incident highlights the lack of transparency by Temasek

The leaked document further noteTemasek’s handling of Goodyear’s departure generated renewed attention to the fund’s lack of transparency. Local press reports have begun speculation on the nature of the alleged strategic differences, why they were not discovered earlier, and why they could not be resolved during the company’s long vetting process.

It mentioned that foreign press editorials, including the Wall Street Journal’s were more critical in tone, emphasizing the right of Singaporeans to know the whole story behind Goodyear’s resignation.

Of course, we all know we didn’t.

And when the news of Goodyear’s resignation was announced, Mr Dhanabalan only said, “It is with much regret that both Chip and the Board have accepted that it is best not to proceed with the leadership transition. We wish Chip all the best in his future endeavours, and are happy that Ho Ching has agreed to continue as Executive Director and CEO.”

In the video above, Mdm Ho too did not say much about the reason behind Goodyear’s departure.

The cable also added that local analysts viewed the cancellation of the transition as much a step away from transparency as the original hiring had been a step toward more transparency and accountability. Temasek’s expected search process for a new CEO will be given closer scrutiny as the decision-making ability of Temasek’s board is called into question.

Critical strategic holding sold?

It is interesting to note the telegram had highlighted that Temasek’s strategic holdings are those considered critical to Singapore’s long-term interests and security and will stay in the portfolio, including DBS Bank, Singapore Airlines (SIA), ST Engineering, and shipping company Neptune Orient Lines (NOL).

Recently the Wall Street Journal has reported that state investment company Temasek Holdings is selling Neptune Orient Lines Ltd (NOL), which was founded in 1968 as Singapore’s national shipping line.

Temasek owns 65% of the shares in NOL, with the remainder traded on the Singapore Stock Exchange.

The US$1.7 billion shipping company is not in a good shape: WSJ describes it as “heavily indebted” and “money losing”. Sources told the paper that the company had been shopped to prospective buyers in recent months.

The shadow of Temasek Holdings' Executive Director and CEO Ho Ching falls on backdrop as she arrives for the presentation of Temasek's annual review in Singapore

One of the most powerful women in the world

Being the wife of Singapore’s most powerful person, Prime Minister, Lee Hsien Loong, Mdm Ho is no lesser in her global standing.

Being named by magazines such as Time and Forbes as one of the world’s most powerful women, Ho stands proudly as the Chief Executive Officer of Temasek Holdings, Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund for over ten years.

Mdm Ho graduated in 1976 with a Bachelor of Engineering (Electrical, First Class Honours) and went on with her career as an engineer at the Ministry of Defence.

She subsequently became the Director of Defence Material Organisation, the defence procurement agency of the Ministry in 1983 after graduating with her Master of Science (Electrical Engineering) degree from Stanford University in 1982, and concurrently held the position of Deputy Director of Defence Science Organisation (DSO).

Mdm Ho’s husband, Lee Hsien Loong was elected as a Member of Parliament (MP) in 1984. Following his election, he was appointed as Minister of State at the Ministry of Trade and Industry and the Ministry of Defence by his father and met Mdm Ho. The two soon got married in the year of 1985.

Mdm Ho took on further various senior responsibilities in DSO before becoming its President and Chief Executive Officer in 1997.

Mdm Ho was also accredited for being the architect for the formation and listing of Singapore Technologies Engineering as the largest listed defence engineering company in Asia in 1997, and served as its first Chairman.

Mdm Ho eventually joined Temasek Holdings as a Director in January 2002 and became its Executive Director in May 2002. She then assumed the role of Chief Executive Officer of Temasek on 1 January 2004 and still holds on the position till this very day.

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

各让一步 新取消ILS马撤禁飞令

新加坡和马来西亚最终同意,在领空纠纷上各让一步,我国撤回实里达机场仪表著陆系统(ILS);马国则同意无限期暂停在巴西古当上空的永久禁飞区。 这也意味着,原先受领空纠纷影响的飞萤航空(Firefly),从本月起终于得以恢復飞往实里达机场的航班。 新马两国交通部长许文远和陆兆福,在今日发表联合声明,指上述新措施在2019年4月5日晚上11时59分,由两国民航局同步实施。 “两国交通部长同意,成立高级委员会检討1974年的同意书。该同意书涵盖新加坡飞机在降陆、离境及飞越新加坡时的规范。” 两国交长欢迎这些积极步骤,期待进一步加强双边合作。同时,期待飞萤航空恢复飞往实里达机场的航班。 实里达机场新搭客大厦,是在去年11月正式投入运作,所有涡轮螺旋桨(turboprop)客机航班从去年12月1日起,须从新加坡樟宜机场转到实里达机场起降。 马来西亚航空公司旗下飞萤航空,是目前唯一在樟宜机场使用涡轮螺旋桨飞机的航空公司。 然而,去年10月26日,马国民航局(CAAM)表明,拒绝批准飞萤航空降落实里达机场,以向新加坡提出抗议。 实里达机场距离柔佛巴西古当仅两公里,如果要落实ILS,飞机就必须飞过巴西古当上方,降落到实里达机场。 马民航局(CAAM)也发布“飞行员通告”(NOTAM),指示为了“军事用途”,而在巴西古当上空设立了永久的飞行管制区。 至于原要在实里达机场落实的仪表著陆系统(ILS,Instrument Landing…

犹如战场:香港中文大学爆发大规模冲突 多名学生受伤

香港示威活动不断升级,自上周五一名大学生周梓乐示威期间坠楼后身亡,示威者为悼念他,于11月11日发起“三罢行动”,最后还衍生出警民冲突,警方在清场过程中,更是开枪射伤两名示威者,其中一名示威者情况危及。 然而,示威活动并没有因此平息,反而加剧了冲突。 综合港媒消息指出,昨日(12日)各区爆发大规模示威行动,示威者堵路并焚烧示威者晚上多次堵路并焚烧离物,警方除了施放催泪弹驱散之外,亦出动炮车射水,有示威者投掷汽油弹。 入夜后,大批防暴警察闯入中文大学、城市大学、香港大学、理工大学等校园,其中以中大最为惨烈。 据《立场新闻》报道,防暴警察在闯入校园后,施放大量催泪弹与橡胶子弹,同时拘捕多名示威者,而学生则以投掷转头、汽油弹等激烈反抗。 《路透社》则形容,香港中文大学数百名示威者聚集在校园内,与防暴警察激烈抵抗,现场状况惨烈,犹如战场。 香港中文大学校长段崇智则曾在傍晚到场调停,学生要求警方撤出校园并释放被捕者,但由于防暴警察称校长无法控制身后学生,称并非谈判的时候,要求他立即离开,随后警方与学生再次爆发冲突,而段崇智则被催泪弹击中,也在催泪弹中离开现场。 暴力升级影响港民 由于示威活动的暴力情况升级,为避免再有人收到伤害,香港教育局宣布停课,并表示由于受到示威者的广泛破坏,亦有学校遭受不同程度的威胁,因此宣布暂时停课。 教育局强烈谴责此等故意危害学童安全、剥夺学生学习基本权利的行为。 香港新界交通金早上再次陷入严重瘫痪,东铁及荃湾线全线暂停,西铁线荃湾西至屯门亦无列车服务,巴士亦只能提供有限度服务。 许多市民已无法正常上班。…

Netizens questioning act of partitioning workers on lorry in light of safe-distancing measures

Netizens are questioning the act of one particular company of partitioning their…

Newspaper said no space to publish Sylvia Lim's comments on appointment of former PAP MP as Deputy AG

Ms Sylvia Lim, Member of Parliament for Aljunied GRC has commented on…