chiongs

It is safe to say that there are few same-sex couples with children here in Singapore. Or they are at least not as visible perhaps as the ubiquitous heterosexual couples with children.

Those who are in a gay partnership and have children, unlike their heterosexual counterparts, are sometimes frowned on by others. And for the most part, these same-sex couples probably would just ignore the taunts, the insults and the complete ignorance of some of those who hurl abuse at them.

And abuse was what met Olivia Chiong and her wife, Irene Chiong, when some came to know of their baby girl, Zoey Chiong.

The couple had married in San Francisco’s City Hall.

However, instead of ignoring the abusive comments online, or getting angry at them, the couple chose to address them head-on, with an article – titled “A Letter To Our Favourite Hate Group” – on their website.

The title of the article is in reference to the homophobic Facebook page, “We are against Pinkdot in Singapore (WAAPD)”.

Pink Dot is the annual celebratory event by the gay community held at Hong Lim Park to celebrate “the right to love”.

The event has attracted an ever-growing number of participants and supporters since its inception in 2009.

The next instalment will take place this Saturday, and for the first time, the organisers have invited Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong to the event. The PM, however, has not replied to the invite.

Referring to some of the comments apparently from those at the homophobic Facebook page, the Chiong couple said, “Unfortunately, there are some people in the group who continue to misunderstand our family, so I thought I would take this chance to address some of their comments and also commend them on their very helpful suggestions.”

They then went on to address, one by one, some of the abusive suggestions, and derogatory allegations made against them.

The couple responded with sarcasm and humour, which makes for a compelling read, as they also shed light into their personal lives.

For example, to a comment by “Peter Shee” that the couple “should go to jail for their crime” of “[robbing] somebody’s else’s baby and the baby’s true identity”, the couple wrote:

zoeyDear Peter Shee, I am happy to let you know that Zoey is a well-adjusted and well-liked child in her school. In fact, her teachers often comment that she is a delightful child whom everyone likes. She has no psychological/emotional problems to speak of and the only problem she has is she is quite messy when she eats and gets food everywhere. I’m also confused on why you think we robbed somebody else’s baby. Unless you mean the doctors and nurses at KK hospital made a mistake and switched her with some other baby at birth. If not, I’m pretty sure she is the baby that I carried for 9 months and came out of me. Do you know something that I don’t? As for going to jail, I’m not sure we’ll enjoy it in there. After all, I hear the food issn’t great and we don’t get Facebook. Add to the fact we haven’t done any crime so I’m pretty sure we don’t belong there. Since you are so convinced that we have committed a crime, why don’t you make a police report? I’m sure the police would be very interested.

Same-sex marriage was in the news recently when PM Lee said that Singapore was “not ready” for it. His comments came about two weeks after the Irish people voted overwhelmingly in a referendum to allow such marriages in the country.

But in Singapore, not only are such marriages not allowed, the couple which has children in such a relationship faces further obstacles when they have a child.

Indeed, this was precisely what happened to the Chiongs when Zoey was born, as Olivia wrote in another post on the website:

“Given that we are in a lesbian relationship, in the eyes of the law, I had given birth as a single mother. Irene took the paperwork down to the registration desk at KKH and was told I had to personally go to ICA to register Zoey’s birth. This rule is so incredibly stupid, I cannot even begin to express my anger at it. It is hard enough to be a single mother with less support and help than other mothers. If you had a c-section, you would be a single mother, recovering from surgery with a newborn and you still need to go to ICA just to register said newborn. This is all because the government wants you to swear in front of a notary public that you are a single mother before allowing you to register a child who is born outside of marriage.”

But Olivia and Irene are aware of these obstacles which they will face in Singapore.

Nonetheless, they are undaunted.

“Life is not meant to be lived in fear,” Olivia wrote on the website. “I believe in living my life the way I want instead of living life the way others expect me to. Sure, we may face some obstacles along the way, but how can you know true happiness if you have not had to fight for it? As humans, our emotions play a big part in the ups and downs of our lives. Happiness is a state of mind that can only be achieved if you have known sadness. It is all relative.”

Subscribe
Notify of
68 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Singapore authorities investigating second Singaporean involved in 1MDB case

Singapore authorities have begun investigations into the Malaysian state fund 1Malaysia Development…

PSP’s Kala Manickam highlights “lack of coordinated service” by Gov’t in quarantine process when repatriating her mother

Progress Singapore Party’s (PSP) member Kala Manickam took to Facebook on Wednesday…

选举期间谁行使《防假消息法》? 各部门常任秘书代行

若国会解散,各部门部长将卸任,届时谁行使《防假消息法》权益? 根据昨日(8日)发布的其中一篇政府宪报,阐述若选举期间,由16政府部门的常任秘书代行。 在《防止网络假信息和防止网络操纵法案》下,若选举令状发出,部长停止职权,惟他们的职权可由其他权职者代行,包括高级公务员。 防假消息法是在2019年10月25日宪报。去年4月1日,《防假消息法》正式提呈国会,并在5月8日,经过两天的激辩,晚上10时20分结束前,以72票赞成,九票反对,三票弃权三读通过 2019年6月3日,该法提呈予哈莉玛总统批准。 5月8日的第105次国会会议,《防假消息法》在国会引起朝野激烈辩论,工人党议员表态反对,相续对《防假消息法》提出观点,其中也包括质疑何以新法赋予部长取缔假信息的权力,以及为何绕过司法审讯,由部长先行裁决假消息并采取行动。 人民行动党72议员投下赞成票,工人党的六名议员:毕丹星、林瑞莲、刘程强、方荣发、陈硕茂和费沙,三名非选区议员:贝理安、吴佩松和陈立峰则投下反对票。 《防假消息法》备受争议 该法自提呈国会以来即备受争议,不仅政界人士,包括国内外学术界、媒体、公民组织等都已对该法提出质疑。

自2009年,警方共发出8545份公众集会许可申请

内政部表示,自2009年公共秩序法实施以来,警方共发出了8千545份公众集会许可申请。 1月5日,内政部以书面答复盛港集选区议员辣玉莎,后者质询迄今为止警方供发出多少份集会准证,准许在芳林公园举行公众集会,又有多少是被拒绝的。 内政部则解释,在芳林公园举行的集会准证申请,很可能因为若干原因而被拒,如主办方取消或延迟活动。 根据公共秩序法第7条(2),除其他原因外,若警察局局长认为事前有合理理由,警方将会拒绝申请。 这些理由如下: 造成公共混乱或对公共或私人财产造成损害; 妨害公众; 危及任何人的安全; 引起新加坡不同群体间的敌意、仇恨、恶意; 煽动或美化恐怖主义行为; 在禁区举行公众集会; 由外国组织操控,引导公共集会走向政治目的…