By Terry Xu
Update – Video footage of the bus showed that at no point in time did the pants of Sakthivel dropped when he was on bus.
The death of Sakthivel Kumaravelu was the incident which sparked the riot on December 8 in Little India along Race Course Road. The official story has been expressed as a timeline by the police and widely publicised by the local mainstream media.
littleindiariots_timeline
However, here is a somewhat alternative story of what transpired on 8 December 2013 we pieced together from various sources and interviews with workers.
From interviews with people who know Sakthivel Kumaravelu, the worker who died in the accident. He was said to be at Little India that night to collect medicine from his mother which was being delivered by one of his cousins coming to Singapore.
Sakthivel Kumaravelu was said to have boarded the bus around nine pm to return to his dormitory in Jurong. He also drank alcohol and was said to be tipsy when he went up the bus.
According to those we spoke to, Sakthivel was involved in a commotion and the bus driver wanted him off the bus but failed to get him to leave. He then got the time keeper or bus coordinator of the bus service, Grace Wong, to get him off the bus. After he was off the bus, the bus started to drive off.
While making the left turn at the corner of the road, the bus slowed down. Sakhtivel decided to run after it but lost his balance after putting his hand on the bus and fell on the road. (read here for the official version of the accident)
Without seeing Sakhtivel, the bus first ran over his head by the front wheel of the bus and then pinned him under its back wheel as the bus came to a stop.
accidentscene_02
The bus driver had been alerted by the then panicked bus passengers.
(Warning – graphical images) Sakthivel’s funeral photos showed a somewhat disfigured face. There is also a photo of him pinned under the rear wheel of the bus.
The passengers alighted and wanted to save his life. They approached the bus driver and asked him to move the bus so that Sakthivel could be extricated from its wheel. However, the bus driver did not do so.
From third party accounts, we understand that the bus driver said he would not move the vehicle but did not explain why he couldn’t. In interviews with coach drivers, we understand that the standard operation procedure for drivers to act in such an event is to not move the vehicle until the police arrive. The area in which such an accident takes place could also be a potential crime scene.
Some of the workers then decided to get Grace Wong who was at the boarding area to persuade the driver to move the vehicle so that the body/person could be extricated.
However the workers were not able to convince Grace Wong or the driver to do so and one worker attacked her in anger. On seeing this, another foreign worker tried to shield her and shoved her up the bus so that she would not continue to be attacked. Once she was up the bus, the driver locked the doors.
In an account said by one of the shopkeepers, the workers tried to lift the bus to extricate the body but did not succeed in doing so.
The workers starting hitting the bus and threw objects at it out of desperation to have the driver move the bus and also out of frustration that their countryman is still underneath the bus.
One of the man around the bus is saying, “The bus driver is inside, the bus driver is inside”.

The fire engine arrived first and civil defence personnel started the process of extricating the body from under the bus.
When the police and ambulance finally arrived, the victim was declared dead on the spot by the paramedics.

After the body was extricated and left on the road, third party accounts mentioned that the body of Sakthivel was not covered with police tent.
The paramedics then went to attend to the driver and Ms Grace Wong, and escorted them out of the bus and into the ambulance by the police.
While the driver was escorted away from the scene of the incident, anecdotal accounts indicated that someone shouted in Tamil something about how the authorities were racially biased. There were also some heated moments between the uniformed personnel and crowd seen from videos taken as well as accounts from our interviews.

And for some reason, the crowd erupted in furore, throwing debris, beer bottles at the uniformed personnel in anger.
We interviewed the store owner of the shop which is nearest to the site of the incident. He said that the people in the crowd grabbed his vegetables and started throwing at the police, and some of them went in to ask if they had any empty beer bottles. When he said no, the people went out and started digging the trash bins for what they wanted.
At the scene, we can see that parts of the pavement are smashed and the cement supposedly improvised to be projectiles to throw at the police.
pavement
The police retreated back to their vehicles while the mob continued raining projectiles on them.
At one point, the crowd of rioters advanced and started overturning the vehicles, setting them on fire.

According to someone who was on the ground that night, the people who were hiding in the ambulance were told to get out of the vehicle by the mob because the mob wanted to burn the vehicle.

From the video footage, we can see that most of the crowd had dispersed by then time the police was giving its warning. Some are seen leaving the scene via the Little India MRT station.
From an interview of a shop keeper right after the incident, the riot trucks were not deployed at the start of the incident. And by the time it arrived and formed up, there isn’t much of a crowd left.

As the story develops to this point, it is still uncertain what was the spark that started off the unrest.
Workers we spoke to denied being there in Little India on the night of the riot. The accounts they told us were what they had heard from others, through discussions or conversations at their dormitories and elsewhere.
When we asked if any of them or their friends had video-taped the incident, especially when the accident first happened, they said they did not, while some told us that their friends had deleted any videos they had taken, so that they would not get into trouble when the police came to investigate.
Look out for more stories on the Little India incident, including our interviews with some workers who have returned to India.
 
 
 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

People’s Association should not serve political party as it’s taxpayer funded

~by: Shanta Arul~ I refer to the letter written to the Straits…

Mothers question MOE's policy of withholding PSLE results; donors ask why there is an underclass in Singapore

Something is “very seriously wrong” about the Ministry of Education (MOE) policy…

载假乘客险遭打劫 德士司机鸣车笛获救

一名德士司机载客遭“假乘客”殴打,疑似企图抢劫,所幸司机及时按响车喇叭,将“假乘客”吓得逃离现场。 署名Muhd Taufiq的网友在脸书上帖文,指其担任德士司机的父亲,于昨日(19日)清晨5时许,在后港6大道的巴士站险些遭人抢劫,虽然获救,但是满身伤痕累累。 他于昨日清晨5时21分被母亲叫醒后,自母亲口中听闻有关坏消息。 帖文中写到,网友父亲是在后港的德士站前,遇到这名声称要到圣淘沙名胜世界赌场的男子,说着本地华语表示忘记带一些东西,因此请父亲在他的指引下,载他一程。 据悉,男子身材高大,一头金发且身穿白色上衣和蓝色牛仔裤。他指示网友父亲在附近一带游走后,就在后港6大道的巴士站要求停车,随后就自后大力勒住父亲的颈部往后拉,导致父亲感觉到呼吸困难。“父亲被勒住时大力挣扎,甚至尝试咬住嫌犯的手部。” “岂知男子下车走到驾驶座,将我父亲的胸部压向座位,并不断朝父亲的脸挥拳,大约有四、五次。” 网友表示,父亲曾尝试在男子下车时尝试脱下安全带,但是他当时有点虚脱并受到惊吓,才未能成功逃脱。 父亲鸣笛  男子溜走 遭男子殴打后,父亲成功按下车笛向附近的居民求救,只是当时该区并没有人。而男子在父亲鸣笛后,立刻将父亲推开,关掉车子引擎,并将钥匙丢到汽车的仪表板上,跳下车跑得不见踪影。 父亲也立即报警,警员于10分钟后赶抵现场,并召来救护车将父亲送院治疗,警方调查官已经就此事向父亲录取口供。…

合谋骗370万元赔偿金 母子面控

儿子扯谎,母亲装死,企图骗取高达370万元的公积金(CPF)和保险费赔偿,两人于上周五(4月12日)被控上法庭。 现年35岁的儿子亚伯拉罕·洛克(Abraham Rock)以及其53岁的母亲达拉·法曼(Talat Farman)被控报假案,企图索取欲370万元的赔偿。 安盛保险公司(AXA)于2018年11月13日报警,怀疑亚伯拉罕伪造其母亲法曼于巴基斯坦死亡的证件。 当时,职总英康(NTUC Income)依据家属保障计划(DPS)已支付了4万9000元,而公积金局也从“死者”账户中支出了8万331.23元。 商业事务局(CAD)官员于2018年11月21日逮捕了亚伯拉罕,其母亲随后也落网了。 提交当地警方医院报告 根据法庭文件指出,法曼与其儿子和另外的三名男子密谋有关的假死案件,并让她看似死于去年7月5日发生在巴基斯坦白沙瓦的一场车祸中。 7月17日,亚伯拉罕提交来自巴基斯坦警察局的警察报告给大东方保险(Great Eastern),旨在向数份保险金可高达100万元的保单申请索赔。他也想该保险公司索取6万元的个人意外保险金和7万1998.96的人寿保险赔偿金。…