Straits Times wrote a report on Tuesday citing that Singapore now provides one of the world’s cheapest home broadband connections. (link)
The report writes, “with a monthly fee of $49.99, the cost of each Mbps in MyRepublic’s plan is now down to five cents, compared with the previous low of 13.9 cents for each Mbps with SingTel’s 500Mbps plan, which costs $69.95 a month.”
Is it one of the cheapest or one of the most expensive?
Arguably, there may be something that is wrong with the headline, because as I understand it – if you compare the cheapest broadband plan cost on a monthly basis – Singapore may be one of the most expensive. (Not even in reference to wage that one would get in the country)
In other words, we should be comparing what is the cheapest that one can pay for broadband, instead of just comparing the cost per Mbs.
Comparison speaks for itself?
The report broke down the cost for each Mbps for different countries; 2.5 cents in South Korea, three cents in Japan and and 3.5 cents in Hong Kong.
cheapinternet
How can we be given the impression in the article that Singapore now provides one of the world’s cheapest home broadband connections alongside other Asian technohubs with today’s launch of MyRepublic’s 1Gbps plan when Singapore’s at 5 cents is 50 to 43 per cent higher than the Asian countries – South Korea, Japan and Hong Kong?
And how is it that we can use the highest speed plan to come to the conclusion that Singapore’s broadband is “one of the world’s cheapest”? Shouldn’t we be comparing price for lower speed plans as well?
So for a change, let us look at the plans that the countries and companies used in comparison have for their cheapest plan for 100mbps.

Location Service Provider Cost for 100 mbps
South Korea CJ Hello Vision 13500 KRW (16.2 SGD)
Japan So-net Entertainment 3570 YEN (43.5 SGD)
Hong Kong HKBN 188 HKD (30.8 SGD)
Singapore M1 59 SGD
Kansas City, United States Google Fibre Free* (5mbps)

*There is no 100 mbps option for Google Fibre but users can get free internet at 5 mbps
In this regard, how many in Singapore subscribe to the highest speed plan and how little can subscribers pay to have decent internet access speed?
Uniquely Singapore!
By Leong Sze Hian
 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Bureau-crazy

Jack Sim believes bureaucrazy can be defeated.

中国人捐赠物置放领事馆外 三箱子口罩被当可疑物引爆

马来西亚的中国驻槟城总领事馆外放了三个可疑箱子,引起警方的拆弹专家和拆弹机械人进行引爆,岂知爆出来的竟然是口罩,而置放箱子者则是五男二女中国人。 据悉,总领事馆的职员于1月31日下午3时许,在领事馆门口发现三个可疑盒子,于是联络相关单位。 槟城消拯局和警方在接获投报,到到现场进行考察,由于无法确定盒子内的物品,便根据程序启动引爆行动。 警方当时派出了拆弹专家和拆单机器人到现场展开谨慎调查,救护车也在现场待命。现场的记者都被疏散道远出后,拆弹专家身穿防爆服,在遥控机器人的帮助下打开盒子准备引爆。 没交流导致虚惊一场 有关引爆工作于下午5时15分进行第一次,随后在进行第二次引爆的当儿,多个口罩被“炸飞”出来,证实了一切只是虚惊一场。 槟城消拯局当天发文告指出,由于放置箱子的认识不明,因此最后由槟城消拯局危险物品特别拯救部队(Hazmat)回收口罩。 当天在优管(YouTube)上也流传了一则视频,只见数人在该领事馆外面拉着横幅和置放箱子。 他们拉着的横幅上写道:“我们代表马来西亚华侨,诚心祈愿武汉同胞们身强体壮早日康复”、“武汉加油!”。 警方随后根据有关线索调查,发现三箱口罩原来是由七名身在马国的中国人,分别是5名男子和两名女捐赠给中国同乡。 当地警区主任表示,这七人当时分乘两辆休旅车抵达领事馆,放置三箱口罩后拍下视频,逗留了半小时后就安静离开。 基于领事馆职员并不认识他们,且没有进一步交流,导致了这一宗乌龙事件的发生。

PAP must return CPF money to the people: SDP

By Howard Lee Responding to Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s announcements at…

Chan Chun Sing shoots his own foot with rebuttal to Sylvia Lim's claim on PA

On Wednesday, Member of Parliament for Aljunied GRC, Ms Sylvia Lim spoke…