By Nix

cockburn

I work in the south-western region of metropolitian Perth. So it is an everyday thing to drive past through the City of Cockburn. Lately I spotted some curious signage all over the city that cried, “Hands off Cockburn!” Many of these signage were not professionally made. Some were even handwritten and erected casually by the side of the road. However, the messages on these were far from casual and I could feel the messengers were dead serious about that.The protestants were residents of Cockburn. (pronounced as Ko-burn, in case you have a picture of a charred dick in your mind) They were protesting against the state government’s intention to break up the City of Cockburn and merge the northern and southern parts to the City of Melville and Kwinana respectively. My curiosity with the random signs led me to do a brief read up online and learnt that the Cockburn community actually held a protest outside the Parliament House last month to have their voices heard: They did not want their City to be carved up and given to other councils.

At the rally, the Cockburn community submitted its own proposal, (I will spare you the details) along with almost 11,000 signatures from the electors showing the community support for their proposals. What impressed me was the committee behind this only took ten days to come out with a 100-page proposal and manage to amass close to 11,000 people to support it. Quite a feat, if you think about how logistically challenged it is for them to do so as compared to our situation in Singapore. That only tells me one thing, the community spirit is very strong over here, much like the Kampong Spirit that used to exist many pockets of Singapore.

These protestants would be arrested by the police if they had done that in Singapore. One would wonder why. Did the protest (shown above) look like a Little India riot to you? Were the protestants violent or disorder? No. Did they cause public inconveniences? No. The most important question Singaporeans should think about, do we have a right to voice out against decisions of the government that we do not agree with? The community of Cockburn had it and did it. Whether or not their proposal would be accepted later was inconsequential to me (but obviously not to them) because I felt the whole thing was a new experience, a new sensation to me altogether. It made me feel the place was actually alive, not the boring Perth that Singaporeans love to assume. It made me feel that people here are living things who care about the people, community groups, nature and identity around them unlike the absolute apathy that I used to experience in “vibrant Singapore.”
I wrote this not to condone protests or encourage people to become dissidents but to highlight the importance of having passionate close knitted communities in Singapore. In an environment where the government tells the people regularly to “take care of ourselves”, my point couldn’t be emphasize enough. Unfortunately, our community spirit is fast dwindling. Think about it, if we cannot even be attached to our surroundings or take pride in our community identity, how will the future generation be take pride in their country?
If you want proof that the people don’t give a damn what happens to their constituencies, just look for anyone who gave a damn when the GRCs of Cheng San or Eunos were broken up to combine with the other GRCs or wards. Most of us didn’t even understand the impact of these arrangements. Will the residents of Potong Pasir voice their unhappiness (if any) when they become part of a GRC in the next elections? To us, a constituency border is just a boundary line on the map, only applicable during the General Elections. Besides, what can we do about it? Protest like the Cockburn residents? I am not sure at all Singaporeans would bother to do so even if protesting is made legal in Singapore. It isn’t about protesting, it is about whether we even care or not. We don’t and probably never will.
Perhaps the system was designed with the purpose of segregating the people so that power can be eternally maintained since the divided can be easily conquered., combined with the constant emphasis on materialism, so that the people would focus solely on material pursuits and be useful economic numbers in their entire life span. What an amazing model. Such brilliance. But life is so cruel for the people who woke.
This article was first published in http://asingaporeanson.blogspot.sg

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

陆交局拟没收脚车 oBike公司欠押金630万新元

上周,oBike脚车出租公司基于无法达到陆路交通管理局新执照条例需求,宣布将退出新加坡市场。该公司此举引来用户不满,纷纷要求退回押金款项。 oBike公司在其文告对于近期造成的不便致歉,并表示目前正与陆路交通管理局和消费者协会等多个单位商议,设法退回用户们的押金。 “我们和相关单位紧密配合,达成退回押金给用户的方案。退款程序将在细节确定后公布。” 该公司也保证,不会滥用和泄露注册该公司出租脚车服务的用户个资和隐私。 oBike司公布退出新国市场后,新加坡消费者协会在短短四天接获超过800宗投诉,要求该公司退回49新元的押金。 据《联合早报》采访,oBike创始投资人兼董事长石一表示无法取回押金的客户约有10多万人,其中不少用户支付的是19元学生配套,公司拖欠押金达630万新元。 他承诺,无论如何只要用户想取回押金,该公司尽力偿还,最坏打算就是以自己的股份承担。据了解,石一在oBike Global有23巴仙股份,总值100多万美元。他表示可能询问其他股东是否愿意协助偿还。 石一对于oBike退出新加坡市场感到遗憾,因为公司没有信心能符合申请执照所需的条件和资金,包括营运成本、脚车修理费和执照等,若经营下去每年估计需支付超过1千万新元。他认为如果陆交局能放宽条例,肯定能继续运作。 限期到,陆交局没收脚车 oBike公司也表示,目前仍与陆路交通管理局商讨,在7月4日前回收旗下近1万4千辆脚车。 陆路交通管理局已下指示,过了限期,该局将没收任何在公共区域出现的oBike出租脚车。到时该公司若要索回脚车,就必须支付每辆脚车的拖车和仓储费用。…

【选举】专家预测行动党得票破七成 贝理安冀选民正视权力制衡

工人党阿裕尼集选区准候选人贝理安,在昨日分享《联合晚报》剪报。有关誌期本月24日的报导,指专家预测执政党在此次选举得票率,有望破七成,甚至于能突破75巴仙。 报导提及每逢危机的不确定笼罩,执政党得票率都超高;再者疫情下第四代领导班子的曝光率也较高。新加坡管理学院全球教育兼职讲师陈添金博士称,人们在危机中担心生计,会希望执政团队强力领导。 而贝理安估计,即使是很弱的候选人,只要跟随曝光率高的行动党部长都能在集选区获胜。他也指出,2001年美国发生911空袭事件不久后,我国也召开选举,行动党得票75.3巴仙。当时反对党中只有刘程强和詹时中党选,得票率仅超过50巴仙。 贝理安称,行动党决定选举时机。但是在野党可以掌控的,就是在国会中的斗争,包括提出关乎人民的课题、替代方案以及接触选民的基层工作,这都是工人党在选举前就致力的工作。 然而,贝理安也希望,珍视权力制衡、对政府问责和多元意见,且认为强大反对党有利国家的新加坡人,能在此次选举扮演他们的角色,确保这些价值观能融入国家的氛围。

Abolish the ISA immediately

~Editorial~ After all this time, the Internal Security Act continues to be…