the following are Minister of State for National Development, Tan Chuan-Jin's notes on Bukit Brown from his Facebook:


We just had a briefing and discussion on Bukit Brown. This was an opportunity to share our considerations behind the issue of the road, which I had announced in Parliament on 5th March, and to also listen to the views held by many who are passionate on the heritage and history of the place. 

Understandably, our decision to proceed with the construction of the road has caused disappointment to those who want to conserve Bukit Brown. I want to give assurance to those who have been giving us their views on this matter that the decision has not been an easy one. While we have not been able to fully accommodate their wishes, we have taken many of their views into consideration. For instance, the decision to embark on a serious documentation of the affected graves was a result of advice we received from friends from the heritage society. LTA has also factored in feedback in their design of the road to minimise impact to the cemetery, hydrology and biodiversity.
 
Going forward, we need to continue with these conversations. For example, we are now looking at working with interested stakeholders on public outreach to commemorate the history and heritage of Bukit Brown even as we continue with work on documentation.
 
(Note 2) It is illuminating to read the statement issued by the various groups.
 
Yesterday's session on Bukit Brown was never intended to be the type of dialogue desired and claimed by these groups. Nor was it a response to their earlier request. 
 
I had explained that our intent was simply to share with a range of stakeholders on some of the background information and considerations we had previously shared with other groups and to also highlight the road plans which were being announced. It was not a consultation effort to debate about whether the road would be built or not. That has already been stated in Parliament. We were announcing the details, alignment etc. 
 
However, it was clear that it did not matter. Because we failed to conduct a session that was in line with what they wanted e.g. to have their own briefs, to invite others on their invite list, it was deemed to be an inadequate effort at genuine engagement.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

购买烟酒手法层出不穷 人力部已严厉对付违法客工

为了满足私欲,客工想方设法偷运烟酒,手法层出不穷,有白饭藏酒、送餐员夹带、清洁工帮忙运货,但是统统都被查获上缴,而人力部也表示已经对这些违反宿舍禁令的客工,采取严厉行动。 针对日前在社交媒体上流传,有关辅警将充公的啤酒倒入水沟短片,人力部表示和警方已经知晓有客工在过去数个月,非法偷运酒和香烟进入宿舍。 当局指出,客工在冠状病毒19疫情之前,可在宿舍内指定地区喝酒吸烟,但是随着疫情来袭,为了保障治安,才禁止客工在宿舍内喝酒和销售酒精饮料。 因此对违反有关禁令的客工,当局将会采取严厉的对付行动,包括罚款。 此外,当局也将依据疫情的趋势进行调整,考虑逐步放宽禁酒禁烟措施。 其实客工们在面对禁酒禁烟措施上,也有难以压抑的时候,因此千方百计要把酒和烟送到宿舍内。 双溪登加客工宿舍(Sungei Tengah Lodge)的客工就透露,其实香烟、酒和非法嚼烟自今年4月就有人偷运如宿舍了。他们透过垃圾收集工人,利用卡车将这些违禁品运入宿舍后,交给清洁工,后转交给已沟通好的客工,再由该客工进行分发。“客工会先提供用来装酒的空塑料瓶,避免宿舍管理人起疑心。” S11榜鹅客工宿舍的客工,则要求送餐员帮忙夹带酒和香烟,并且和其他客工宿舍,将违禁品藏于食物袋中。但是有关事件最后被揭发,夹带违禁品动作也于5月份结束。 住在西雅卓源宿舍的客工则表示,他们是以和物价对等的“价码”买通了宿舍外的人群,让他们帮忙购买烟酒后,扔进围栏内宿舍的隐蔽地区。“如果我要买10元的物品,就必须支付他们10元的佣金,这样他们才愿意冒险帮忙。”

Public areas in Orchard Road precinct to be designated as no smoking zone from 1 January 2019

The National Environment Agency (NEA) announced in a press release on Wednesday…

Minister Khaw leaves hospital and praises the progress of Singapore’s medical services

Minister Khaw Boon Wan said yesterday (8 Mar) that he was leaving…