~by: Raymond Anthony Fernando~

How much difference can one person make? Imagine the impact of the entire nation working together to improve the community.

If you have been to IMH for meetings or attended talks there, you will find the word "KAIZEN" written on one of its rooms. So, what is "Kaizen" and how is it related to this issue?

"Kaizen" was created in Japan following World War II. The word means “continuous improvement”. It comes from the Japanese words “kai” which means change or to correct and “zen” which translated means good.

Kaizen is a system that involves every employee – from upper management to the cleaning crew. Every worker is encouraged to come up with small improvement suggestions on a regular basis. This is not a monthly or yearly activity, but a continuous year round process that encourages employees to submit ideas to improve the company's performance. Japanese companies such as Toyota and Canon have staff submitting 60 to 70 suggestions a year.

I found the Kaizen system very useful and applied it in my own scope of work during my stint with a big media company, as well as in the community work which I have been doing.

Here are 3 proposals that I submitted to the government when I was serving in the government feedback focus groups.

1. Setting up a Singapore Wish Foundation – Idea submitted to the late President Ong Teng Cheong on 9 June 1999

I was deeply moved by a movie which I watched on the Malaysian TV network on May 1999. The film was based on a true story about a young American child by the name of Missy who was stricken with cancer. Missy, who was dying from the deadly disease, had one wish before she closed her eyes – she wanted to visit the White House in Washington. Her request was made through the American Wish Foundation – an organisation that was set up to fulfil the dying wishes of children stricken with terminal cancer.

Even though it was not easy to grant Missy her dying wish, given the high security at the White House, the staff from the American Wish Foundation went out of their way to grant Missy her wish and the child even got the rare opportunity to meet former U.S President Bill Clinton. The joy and happiness Missy experienced was indescribable and before she passed on, she was all smiles.

Doris and I couldn't stop crying throughout the movie. “It's so depressing to see children dying from cancer,” my wife said, fighting back tears. Missy's story played on my mind for one solid week.

Then an idea struck me. “Doris, remember that movie we saw last week about that cancer child. Wouldn't it be marvellous if we could start a movement like that here in Singapore to benefit our own child citizens?”

“You're always full of ideas and you care for children so much, Ray. Okay, draft that proposal and I'll get it typed for you,” Doris smiled. “Who are you going to sell the idea to? Not easy to get it implemented, you know?”

“Our very own President, His Excellency Mr Ong Teng Cheong?” I told Doris.

“President Ong! Are you serious, Ray?” Doris was stunned.

“Yes, President Ong,” I repeated myself. “He is a very caring person,” I assured Doris.

June 1999

My three-page proposal was submitted to the President on 9 June 1999. His three paragraph reply to me dated 14 June 1999 through his Principal Private Secretary was most encouraging. The letter mentioned that the President was touched by my proposal and my concern for terminally ill children. My suggestion was then sent to the appropriate organisation to consider.

However, the suggestion was not implemented at the time as the agency concerned felt that there was no need for a Singapore Wish Foundation during that period. However, based on my proposal, the agency did agree to facilitate the receiving of such wishes if the need arose. I was pleased to hear this.

I prayed that one day this idea would be implemented because I have a strong affinity with children. And that movie haunted me for months.

June 2002

A few years later, a group of professionals including doctors, lawyers and consultants submitted a similar idea, and it was implemented. I was happy that at last our terminally ill children would benefit from a suggestion that I had first mooted.

That aside, perhaps the civil service could have a system in place to keep useful ideas/suggestions on file, and then review it periodically to assess the suitability for their implementation. This will encourage and motivate Singaporeans to come forward with useful suggestions that can make our country a better place to live, work and play in.

2. News captions for the hearing-impaired – Idea submitted to the then-Prime Minister, Mr Goh Chok Tong on 3 November 1998

Sometimes my wife and I will brainstorm for ideas that can improve the quality of the lives of all Singaporeans. The hearing-impaired is certainly one group that needs to have a better quality of life.

It can be very frustrating to be hearing-impaired. People do not usually understand the disability and communication can be difficult. We must understand that the hearing-impaired can be intelligent functioning adults.

Having seen how hard it is for this group to lead a normal life, we decided to put up a proposal that could help the hearing-impaired keep abreast of current affairs.

We drafted a proposal – “News captions for the hearing-impaired” and submitted it to the former Prime Minister – Mr Goh Chok Tong.

Mr Goh came from humble beginnings and I hoped he could resonate well with those in need. The idea to put out simple news captions during the daily news on local TV stations, which we viewed as a community project, was to enable the hearing-impaired to relate to the world around them by keeping abreast with current affairs, these less fortunate members of society would not lag behind. We proposed that captions need not be too wordy- simple one liner that could spell out what the visuals were screening. For example, when Princess Diana was killed in a car accident, the news caption could read: “PRINCESS DIANA DIES IN CAR CRASH”.

Statistics were produced to justify why the above suggestion could improve the lives of 5,009 registered deaf persons in Singapore. On 3rd November 1998, the idea was presented by Doris to Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong.

We were pleasantly surprised and pleased that the idea was considered for implementation when the Government Feedback Unit wrote to my wife on 7th January 1999 to break this good news.

Today, our hearing-impaired can keep in touch with news and current affairs on national television because we fervently believed that this idea was workable and that every citizen should have a place in society.

3. Using technology to enhance the lives of prisoners – Idea submitted to the then-Prime Minister, Mr Goh Chok Tong on 5 March 2004

Several years ago, I was requested by a lady friend to give moral support to a man who was arrested and put on trial for a crime. The accused parents would fly in from India each time the trial convened. Before the trial commenced, the accused would go on his bended knees and ask for forgiveness from his parents. I felt sorry for him as well as for his parents. It was costly to fly in and out of Singapore to give their son moral support. Not to mention the lawyer's and court fees. If the accused was convicted and given visitation rights, his parents would once again have to fork out more money to fly over. Prisoners, I was told, are given limited number of letters to write to their families.

As I left the court, an idea came to mind. I decided that given the limited access that families have with their imprisoned relatives, it would be helpful to use technology to enhance the lives of those who are separated from their loved ones. Many a time when ties are restricted, spouses and children, who may have to wait years before the prisoners are released, can go astray.

I presented my proposal – “Using technology to improve the lives of prisoners” to former Prime Minister, Mr Goh Chok Tong on 5 March 2004. In my proposal, I outlined the problems prisoners faced when they are given limited access to their families and highlighted the government's good intentions of giving prisoners a second chance. I suggested that the prison authorities could allow prisoners and families to link up with each other through emails. Carried out weekly, these online letters could be screened by a moderator from the prison departments. Computers could be given by corporate sponsors and seeing that this would be a community project, I had every confidence that such sponsors would readily step forward. Once families stay connected on a regular basis, the chances of marriages falling apart and children going astray would be significantly reduced, I concluded.

I was delighted to receive a letter from Mr Adam Chew – a staff officer from the prisons department on 17 March 2004 informing me that the feasibility of my suggestion would be reviewed and explored for possible implementation.

I'm not too sure if my idea has been implemented, but I fervently believe that our prisoners and their families will benefit if the proposal is eventually accepted. Certainly, it can put Singapore on the world map. And if the implemented idea is proven to be successful, our Government could promote the scheme to other countries through diplomatic channels.

I am confident that once prisoners in all parts of the world are given more opportunities to interact with their loved ones we will indeed be giving ex-convicts a second chance and in the process there will be less social problems everywhere – by way of fewer broken marriages, less children becoming rebellious, and a reduction in dysfunctional families. Won't we then make the world a better place to live in? In seeking to improve the lives of all those who are marginalised, maybe, we need to dream… the impossible dream.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Wikileaks: US State Department’s views on Young PAP

  Summary. The youth wing of Singapore’s ruling party, Young PAP (YP),…

烟霾困扰多年,何处是个头?

回溯2016年1月28日,工人党非选区议员贝理安,在国会提问财政部,政府可有监督,国家主权基金淡马锡控股和政府投资公司是否有投资在涉及烟霾问题的公司? 如有,政府投资公司(GIC)和淡马锡,在这些公司又投资多少?又如何确保他们的投资,不被用来用在支持导致霾害的活动? 当时的财政部长王瑞杰作出书面答复,是这么回答的:GIC和淡马锡的投资是相关公司的责任,政府则监督他们整体表现。两家公司“纯商业基础上运作,以最大化长期的经调整风险回酬。至于公司投资决策,完全独立于任何政府干预。 这是我们致力维持的管理原则。” 声明中称,淡马锡和GIC的投资活动,旨在持续性的基础上确保长期回报。而投资在缺乏环境永续性行为的公司,将对长期投资带来负面影响。 “淡马锡已声明全力响应零焚烧的开垦政策,也呼吁油棕公司和业者这么做。至于GIC也告知政府,GIC在印尼投资的油棕公司,已确认他们遵循零焚烧政策。”   从有关答复,再对比贝理安质询,究竟国家主权基金公司有无投资在这些涉及霾害公司?只能说答复是何等委婉迂回,仅表示两家企业“独立于政府干预”、“需最大化长期回酬”、以及淡马锡和GIC都已响应、或确保所投资油棕公司已响应零焚烧政策云云? 所以,究竟淡马锡和GIC,在印尼投资的油棕或种植园有多少?那些新加坡投资的公司涉及霾害? 工人党也配合最近烟霾问题,重新其中一个工人党脸书专页One WP, One…

Renowned Singapore ventriloquist, Victor Khoo dies

Veteran Singapore entertainer and renowned ventriloquist, Victor Khoo passed away on Friday morning…

“不经意地”只告知病人MRI扫描报价上限 樟宜医院致歉

上月20日,民众林川宝(译音)投书《海峡时报论坛》抱怨,自己在樟宜综合医院光是照个核磁共振成像(MRI),价格就比起私人诊所的收费更高,差距两倍以上。 林川宝是在上月16日到樟宜综合医院骨科接受检查。医生则怀疑他患有严重的肩旋转肌撕裂(rotator cuff tear),便提议要做MRI检查。 为了能够治疗肩膀疼痛,早前他也在樟宜医院预约3月下旬才做检查,收费为1千450元;但他较后决定先到私人诊所进行MRI检查,却发现含税竟仅需600元。这令前者对樟宜医院的收费更高,感到困惑。 对此,樟宜综合医院首席财务官林丽娜(Lim Lee Nor)则在前日(2019年12月31日),在《海时》回应林川宝先生的质问。 “扫描价格取决于多种因素” 林丽娜证实该院医生建议林川宝进行MRI扫描以进行更好的诊断,“特定扫描的价格,取决于多种因素,例如病情复杂程度、临床方案、使用的机器类型、扫描图像质量和使用时间等。” 林丽娜指该院的收费和其他公立和私人医院“相当”,并指该院的做法是把价格范围报价给病人。 但她指出,在林川宝的个案上,当他们和后者沟通时,却“不经意地”(inadvertently)只告知对方预估价格的上限。…