Leong Sze Hian /

I refer to the deposit required for admission to public hospitals.

No subsidised ward, how?

Since patients needing emergency care and who have financial difficulties with furnishing a deposit (because the estimated hospitalization bill is higher than the Medisave withdrawal limits, or if the funds in the Medisave account are insufficient) will still be admitted if the medical condition warrants so, what happens to those patients who choose subsidised wards with a medical condition not warranted as “emergency care” and are unable to pay the required deposit?

Maximum wait is 12 hours?

As I understand that the Ministry of Health’s (MOH) Key Performance Indicator (KPI) is that patients in the Accident and Emergency (A&E) ward should not have to wait more than 12 hours for a hospital bed of the selected ward class, I would like to suggest that public hospitals inform such patients that they will be transferred to another public hospital with an available subsidised ward bed, so that patients will know that the wait for a bed should not be more than 12 hours.

Otherwise, patients may be unduly stressed into deciding to upgrade to a non-subsidised higher class ward.

Upgrading policy?

Since it has always been and still is the policy at all public hospitals to upgrade patients to higher class wards when the selected subsidised ward class bed is not available, and still charge the non-subsidised rate, I would like to suggest that this policy be made known to subsidised patients as well when a bed is not available.

Otherwise, patients may similarly be overly stressed, thinking that they must find the money to upgrade to a non-subsidised ward in order to be hospitalized.

How many can’t pay?

By the way, how many patients who are hospitalized in public hospitals are unable to pay their bills when they are discharged?

And how many end up paying 24 per cent interest on their credit cards to pay for the admission deposit required?

‘Subsidised’ – need deposit?

Finally why is it that the estimated hospitalization bill can be higher than the Medisave withdrawal limits, even for patients who choose subsidised wards, and thus still require a deposit?

Shouldn’t “Medisave withdrawal limits” be sufficient for subsidised wards hospitalization, in the first place?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

明年起,移民与关卡局不再接受马国集体旅游文件

明年起,为强化关卡的保安措施与通关程序,移民与关卡局将不再接受马来西亚人集体旅游文件。 目前马国人集体旅游文件(Malaysian Collective Travel Document)均由马移民局发出,可让五至20名马来西亚人集体通关,以文件取代个别护照。 我国目前仅接受马国集体旅游文件,对于其他国家旅客则没有安排相关的通关程序。 近年,关卡局正逐步使用自动化和多模态生物认证系统优化通关程序,但由于马来西亚集体旅游文件使用者是文件,无法通过自动通关,同时多名旅客使用同一个证件通关也存在安全隐患。 有鉴于此,我国当局宣布从明年1月1日起不再接受有关文件,并已通知马国当局有关消息。马国集体旅游文件者应申请护照,才可在新措施生效后继续入境我国。

杨厝港巴士转换站撞死三路人 验尸官:司机可能因心脏不适突晕厥

早前罗厘司机在杨厝港巴士转换站撞飞三名路人后伤重不治,验尸官表示罗厘司机很可能在事故发生当下由其心脏不适而晕厥的可能,并称其事故是一场不幸的交通事故。 该事故发生于2018年4月23日早上9点半左右,一辆罗厘失控撞死三名路人。罗厘司机许凯翔(译音)当时正要去拿包裹,正要转向左侧时,却撞上一辆双层巴士,然后在撞上路边的三名路人,包括死者86岁蔡庆忠和58岁的蔡爱华父女,以及63岁的男子叶顺发。 民防部队人员抵达现场后,宣告三名路人当场死亡。其中两人受困在罗厘车底,民防部队人员须使用气袋垫高罗厘把他们移出来,罗厘司机也受重伤。 司机称自己在开车途中突然眼前一片黑暗,当下也丧失了意识。随后,在供词上,他也表示案发当时因视力模糊和头部出现沉重感而意识开始模糊,司机表示当时虽然尽力睁开双眼,但却无法做到。 司机也忆述,他在意外发生前最后一件事是车子正在行驶,但当他意识清醒时才发现罗厘被撞了,他的脚也被卡住。 随后,他在去年10月时,承认无照驾驶,被判罚款1400元,此外也被判无事省释,但不等同无罪。 根据指控,他有可能因涉嫌以对公众产生危险的方式开车,以及无法对车子进行适当的控制而再加控一罪。一旦罪成,被告可能获判最高五年的罪行。 验尸官:是一场不幸交通事故 但随着7个月的调查后,验尸官公布结果,表示这是一起不幸的交通事故,排除危驾的指控,因此被告可能不会面对监禁,但目前尚不知他会否再被重新提控。 受害者家属也在法庭上告诉记者,他们不接受验尸官的结果,也将会对被告提起民事诉讼。对于被告意识不清的说法,受害者家属认为该说法与被告的口供不一致,相信他是累了而睡着,而不如他所说意识不清。 根据被告的口供,他在不到两岁时被诊断出患有严重的心脏病,他也在之后进行了三次的手术。然而,在2013年3月开始变停止追踪,并被诊断为心脏功能不错,医生也不曾警告过他不许开车。 但根据报告显示,他曾在过去几年内出现轻微的视力模糊,但他也未曾就医或通知他的雇主。…

Couldn’t LTA scrap or reduce COE for taxis to reduce the pressure upon taxi drivers?

By Leong Sze Hian I refer to the article “LTA scrapping minimum…

MFA: Malaysia lost the right to review the price of water under the 1962 Water Agreement

Singapore has been clear and consistent that its position is that Malaysia…