– By Gangasudhan

Green Drinks Singapore received a tip-off today that at least one office building in the city has been ‘encouraged’ by the Singapore Tourism Board (STB) to leave their lights on during the 3 days of F1 races in order to “facilitate a captivating night-view of Singapore City for international TV broadcast and photography”.

click to see larger image

In an email memo to its tenants (reproduced above), CaptaLand (RCS) Property Management asked Raffles City Tower offices to leave the lights on from 7.45pm to 11.30pm on each night between 22 September to 26 September this year. Conservative estimates put the number of hours of needless electricity use at 18 hours 45 minutes over the 5 days, which works out to at least $2 per office for the duration.

The Rudimentary Calculation

  • Assuming each office has at least ten 50W light bulbs switched on each night, the energy consumption will be 0.5KWH for every hour the lights are on
  • For the 18.75 hours the lights have been asked to be left on, the total electricity use for the lighting per office will be 9.375KWH
  • At the current rate of 25.82 cents per KWH, the cost will therefore be $2.42 per office

However, this minimalist estimate does not take into consideration the number of offices that will be unoccupied after the close of business day and would just leave the lights on overnight. And while it can be argued that $2 (or more) may be a small price to pay for the ‘honour’ of contributing to the F1 and Singapore’s image, it is contradictory to the Singapore initiative to become a green nation (see Law to push green drive‘, Straits Times, 15 September 2010). Having Mr Mah Bow Tan, the Minister for National Development, as the founding patron of the Singapore Green Building Council whilst at the same time asking offices to keep the lights on for pure vanity’s sake is hypocritical – to put it mildly.

Not to mention, the overarching issue here is the needless waste of electricity regardless of the (perceived) low cost, with the period even extending 2 days prior to the actual race days. Perhaps more effort should have been made to minimise the amount of waste by advising the offices to just switch on the lights closest to the window (if at all they must). With the YOG farce still in the minds of many Singaporeans, the government agencies would do well to be mindful of limiting such waste in the pursuit of illusions.

__________________________________

TOC has written in to the STB for comment (see below) and will update this report with its response when (and if) it is received.

We understand that that the STB has ‘encouraged’ offices that make up the Singapore city skyline to keep their lights on during the F1 races.

Would your office want to clarify or justify this initiative? Also, we would like to know how the STB wants to reconcile this waste of energy with the lofty goal for Singapore to be green-efficient.

We will be publishing the story shortly and will be more than happy to include your response/position into the article as soon as we receive your reply, thank you.

___________________________________________________

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Big Brother descends on Speakers’ Corner

5 cctvs installed at Hong Lim Park. Andrew Loh.

我国赠2.5万冠病试剂盒、100万片手术口罩予缅甸

根据新加坡外交部声明,外交部长维文今日(2日)致电缅甸国务资政翁山淑枝,表示我国将赠送2万5000个冠病19试剂盒,协助缅甸防疫。 除了试剂盒,我国也会捐赠100万片手术口罩和20万瓶消毒洗手液。 早前我国已捐赠一批防疫物资予该国。维文在电话中也重申两国良好关系,并强调双边合作对于战胜疫情尤为重要。两国也同意继续强化供应链,保持经济开放和互通,确保后疫情的经济复苏。

【选举】李显扬:政治是全民之事 “新加坡不需要另一个李家人”

前进党成员、建国总理李光耀次子李显扬认为,政治关乎每个国民,呼吁国民关心家国大事,无惧公开讨论国家面对的问题、推动透明问责的政府,且为了国家的未来无惧投票。 李显扬不参与此次选举。而他在长文中,也解释自己不参与政治职务的一些看法。父亲是李光耀,李显扬从小就在这个位于新加坡政治中心的家庭长大,在这样环境下成长,从政似乎再自然不过,但李显扬认为,新加坡的政治领导,不能只是一个家庭或一个人说了算。 “经验足以证明,王朝政治只会养成坏政府。若人们带着家庭的名声从政,人们就只会依据他们的父母而不是资深表现来评断。” 他认为这种优势显然不符合选贤任能的精神,若政客间都有血缘关系,又怎能要他们相互问责? 他解释这就是为何他选择从商,宁可走自己的路,选择去向股东、雇员、客户乃至社群负责。 “新加坡不再需要多一位“李家人”” “我不从政,是因为新加坡不需要再多一位“李家人”(Singapore does not need another Lee)。”他强调自己尽管对政治感兴趣,但更多是透过发表意见、支持他信任的政党和候选人、贡献时间和精力、或支持独立媒体等,而不是追求权力或特权。“我希望这能起到激起变革的作用。”…