Ho Cheow Seng / Guest Writer

My father has incomplete Secondary Education in English. He speaks better Mandarin than he does the English Language. So he’s an anglophone at the mesolectal level.

My mother, like my father, came from China when she was in her teens. Although her grandfather was a warlord in feudal China and her father fairly well educated in Chinese she was never sent to School. But she speaks a brand of Hokkien with my father that used to leave their anglophone children befuddled. Yes they speak the ‘educated genre’ of their dialect.

So as you can clearly see, my parents cannot be considered to be ‘university calibre’ or academically inclined. However their 4 children all made it to the local national University. How come?

Once I was seated with my friend at a table in a food-centre. The table was not very far from several of the stalls. My friend and I were very amused on that occasion upon hearing the drink-stall owner ‘yacking’ animatedly in ‘market’ Hokkien about how wrong and prejudiced Lui Kong [meaning Thunder-God, MM’s nickname among the semi-literate and the illiterate Singaporeans] was to condemn the not very educated Singaporeans.

The drink-stall owner used a rough-hewn Hokkien idiom to illustrate what he he meant. He said:”How can Lui Kong[LKY] say that because we are ‘sweet potatoes’, we will give birth to ‘baby sweet potatoes’?”

‘Sweet potatoes’ is a term in Hokkien which is used figuratively to describe some one who is a ‘good-for-nothing’. So in Hokkien, the full idiomatic expression of what MM was alleged to have said was rendered as:

“Yee kong nan ‘hun-chih, sare hun-chih kia. Boey sai un nay kuan kong, mah. Yee kuah nan boey kee, aah. Kang nee nah”.

My friend and I quickly turned our face, each in a different direction, because we could hardly control our bursting out aloud in laughter.

But the stall-holder was right. I know for a fact that many among the generation older than I had less than a Secondary, and in some cases, a Primary Education. And in one instance, the Primary-School dropout produced 3 children, two of whom became very successful medical specialists, and the youngest son graduated with an M.A. and became a Secondary School Teacher.

And this is only one instance I am citing here. I have easily half a dozen similar instances to prove that MM’s theory relating to marital discrimination in favour of those with tertiary education holds no water.

Look into the lives of Einstein (high school dropout), Thomas A. Edison (one of the most famous inventors who apparently had less than 3 months of schooling), Henry Ford (no formal education at all), Bill Gates (college dropout), Sylvester Stallone (the man once sold his dog because they had no food to eat), Steve Jobs (college dropout), Michael Dell, Larry Ellison (Billionaire CEO of Oracle Corp)… etc etc.

Oh come on! The older generation did not have 10% of the advantages and privileges that the young of today have because their parents were mostly labourers, working-class folks or, at the most, clerks.

Their children who are now in their late fifties and sixties haven’t done too badly, have they? And we don’t have to go too far to drive home the point, actually. You know what I mean? Aah, I ‘hun chih kia’ also know how to be subtle, you know?

 ———–

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Presidential Election Polling Day – A photo story

Pictures: Terry Xu, Shawn Danker and Chong Woon Hian/ Results of the…

High rate of vaccination but tightened restrictions still on the table; is the gov’t confusing the public again about its position?

Last Friday (3 September), Lawrence Wong, co-chair of the COVID-19 multi-ministry task…

Increasing the number of NCMPs merely a cosmetic measure to appease public

By Ghui People can be a forgetful lot. In the ebb and…

总理提控时评人梁实轩诽谤 下月初公开法庭聆审

只因分享一则脸书贴文,本地知名时评人、金融服务专业协会前主席梁实轩在2018年11月被总理提告诽谤。有关诉讼将在下月初在公堂(Openg  Court),由法官Aedit Abdullah聆审。 梁实轩代表律师林鼎,在昨日于脸书更新诉讼进展,指聆审将落在7月6日至10日之间,且公开于民众旁听。 据林鼎回答网民留言表示,预料总理也将出席该聆审。 梁实轩是在2018年11月初,分享了誌期11月5日的State Times Review(STR)文章,标题为《李显龙成为一马公司弊案主要调查对象》。 有关文章指《砂拉越报告》主编克莱尔,在接受访谈时指出在一马公司弊案中,新加坡和瑞士及美国,成了调查对象。但较后《砂》已澄清有关文章内容不实,要求STR纠正。 据了解,资讯与媒体发展局(IMDA)隔日致函梁实轩,指其文章违反网络行为准则,要求后者在六小时内撤下有关文章。梁实轩也遵守IMDA的要求。 11月12日,德尊(新加坡)法律事务所致函梁实轩,要求他对总理李显龙公开道歉,并赔偿后者名誉损失。 梁实轩也在去年12月底反诉总理滥用法庭程序,并向总理索讨“名誉损害”的赔偿。…