It’s time to beat the drums and cymbals! Fire the crackers and light the fire-works! China has risen!

China Investment Corporation buys 10% stakes in iconic American money machines, Blackstone, a very successful private equity investor, and Morgan Stanley, a premier investment bank. Citic has a stake in Bear Stearns [Since aborted, just before Bear Stearns collapsed in March: AT] another American investment bank.

Our Singaporean friend Temasek is in discussions to buy into another American icon, Merrill Lynch [Temasek became Merrill’s largest shareholder, buying US$5 billion worth of shares and has just bought another $3.4 billion of new stock, but will be reimbursed for the losses it has suffered on its initial investment. It has originally bought stock at US$48. At the time of the second investment, the stock was trading around US$24: AT]

And the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation (whose chairman is one Lee Kuan Yew, Minister Mentor of Singapore) is thinking of buying into Citi.

Citi has also approached us.

We have American at our mercy.

Hang on a minute. I’m getting carried away. American has conned us once.

China and the rest of Asia have been lending money to Americans so that they (the Americans) can buy cheap goods from us. It works this way. American has budget and current account deficits. They should be cutting consumption.

But because East Asian economies want to continue growing fast, and in order to keep their goods competitive vis-a-vis each other, Asian governments were big buyers of US government securities (“treasuries”).

It seemed a “prizes for all’” bargain. Americans got cheap goods, Asians got good growth. All because Asians used the money they were paid by the Americans to finance more American purchases.

But when the US dollar began to weaken against the Yen and Euro, we all found that we were losing money. Adding insult to injury, we were not being compensated by higher US dollar interest rates. Our buying of US securities (to keep our currencies cheap against the US dollar) kept US interest rates low.

We had made a pact with the capitalist devil: a Faustian pact if ever there was one.

At least Faust got knowledge and Helen of Troy. We didn’t even get good margins. The plutocrats’ The Economist reports that China “accounted for just $3.70” of an iPod retailing for US$244 value. “The largest bite was claimed by Apple: about $80 in gross profit”.

So China’s plan B was to diversify out of US treasuries. What happened?

Blackstone approached us to take a stake in them before it went public or IPOed. In China investing in a company before it IPOs, means obscene profits. Look at Temasek’s unrealised profits on its sales of stakes in Bank of China and China Construction Bank. And the book profits that other foreign investors made in these banks. [Not that obscene after recent falls, but still decent enough: AT]

But our US$3 billion investment in Blackstone was 20% [Now a lot more: AT] in the red, while our recent £1.5 billion investment in British bank Barclays was down 32%. At least in the latter, Temasek is sharing our pain. [It got worse. In June, the price fell below its rights price of 282 pence each with China Development Bank investing a further £136 million in the latest offering, while Temasek invested up to £200 million: AT]

Let’s hope our US$5 billion investment in Morgan Stanley do not also tank in the short term. [It has: AT]

As that decadent, homosexual playwright Oscar Wilde wrote, “To lose one parent may be regarded as a misfortune, to lose both looks like carelessness.”

To have three investments in a row lose money very soon after we invest is an insult to the Chinese people whose money was lost. At least Temasek had a winning run before it stumbled badly over Shin.

I may be accused of being paranoid, but why did Blackstone, Barclays (Britain is a running dog of the Americans), Citi, Morgan Stanley, Bear Stearns and Merrill Lynch, approach us or our friend, Singapore? Can’t they find American or European investors. Where are the Arabs? Why is Fidelity, Warren Buffett, Carlyle, or TPG not investing?

If they were approached, why are they giving these a miss? Do they think that these companies are overvalued or things will get worse?

Or as Buffett once grumbled, investors only get whatever is left over, after investment bankers get paid their obscene salaries. He should know, he invested in an investment bank, one of his less successful investments.

Remember, the American investors can put their ears to the ground to hear the thundering herds, and lift their noses to sniff the wind. Warren Buffet certainly does that and he has just bought an industrial conglomerate, not a financial institution. [In late December, Buffet told CNBC that he had turned down opportunities to invest in financial institutions: AT]

And if Buffett and friends were not approached, why not? A cunning plot to weaken the Chinese people, to ensure continued US hegemony? Congress’s deafening silence on the “Red Peril” to American financial icons must signify something.

Finally, remember history.

When the Japanese got wealthy through selling to America, they were persuaded into buying iconic properties (like Rockefeller Center) and movie studios (like MGM). They were sold dogs by the Americans and the Americans were able to repurchase these assets at great prices. And the Japanese lost on the foreign currency exchange too.

China sold tea to the British in return for silver, Chinese silver. China got opium, a drug which weakened China’s moral fibre, allowing the West to carve out China among themselves.

All these august financial names becoming available for sale could be the opium that weakens the Motherland. Did Mao and our parents die so that we can buy rotting, decaying, imperialist, capitalist icons?

——–

Adrian Tan (AT) came across this internal Chinese Communist Party memo while scavenging for food in Shanghai. It was written by a senior cadre in mid-December 2007; and addressed to the standing committee of the Politburo. The cadre has since been promoted. And China passed on Citi. On his return to Singapore, AT has updated the piece by annotating it.

About the author

Adrian Tan once did corporate law before straying into financial services: corporate finance, fund management and then equities broking.

He has done some PR/ IR and his articles have appeared in Singapore’s mainstream media publications.

———–

Cartoon from My Sketchbook.

———–

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

新邮政下周三起发售鼠年肖像邮票

集邮迷看过来!为了迎接鼠年,鼠年肖像邮票即将在下周三(8日)开始发售。 新邮政于今日(2日)发文告表示,自8日起,即将开始售出鼠年的邮票,其生肖邮票系列中含两种不同的鼠型插图,价格约0.30元吉1.40元。 新邮政表示,将会特别印制预销首日生肖鼠邮戳(Pre-cancelled First Day Cover)全套邮票,其售价为3.10元,包含两枚邮票的展示包则售价为4.15元。 生肖邮票系列意味着新邮政的12年周期的结束与开始,标志着新邮政迎接未来12年的象征,未来将以生肖作为设计风格。新邮政也表示在接下来的日子直至2031年,均将沿用十二生肖的邮票。 该系列邀请动画师兼插画家Lim An-Ling设计,她也曾为2019年新加坡开埠两百年设计纪念邮票。 此外,新邮政也发行了一系列纪念邮票,包括10元的集邮品,其风格以中国传统剪纸风格呈现,并连同红包与MyStamp鼠主题的产品,放入充满中国色彩的文件夹内,内有8个红包内,售价为18.80元。 为了能早日迎接农历新年,新邮政也以出席团圆晚餐作为其特色,发行限量版微型邮票,价格为8.55元,于1月24日开始发售。 同时新邮政也将在1月23日至2月1日“春到河畔2020”间,于…

Mugabe, banned from travelling in the EU but “walks” freely in Singapore

Robert Mugabe, former Zimbabwean leader, has been receiving treatment in Singapore for…

【选举】致函李总理盼退出政坛 吴作栋不参选

吴作栋宣布不会出战本届大选,退出政坛,李显龙总理已经接受了他的决定。 作为荣誉国务资证的吴作栋,致函李显龙指出,他即将年满80岁,精力已经大不如前了。 信中,他表示,希望能够趁着身体健康良好的时候引退,让陈诗龙能够顺利成为他的接棒人。 百汇班台集团前总裁兼董事经理陈诗龙医生,也在今日(25日)获行动党推荐为准候选人。

何晶修改“呃…”贴文 称对台湾朋友贡献“始终心存感恩”

因周六(11日)下午发布的一则“呃…”贴文,总理夫人何晶却引起新加坡和台湾网民热议。事缘何晶在脸书分享有关台湾将捐赠口罩给新加坡的新闻报导,但贴文并未提及感谢、评论等,仅以“Errr…”(呃…)带过。 不过何晶似乎已修改先前贴文,写上数段落的文字,先是感谢台湾朋友们的贡献,“请理解我始终心存感恩”。 她称“我们都知道如今全球都在同一艘船- -对于尽力给予帮助、提供建议的人士,不论成功与否我都深表感谢。”不管那些努力成功与否,她都会珍惜这些诚挚的付出和想法。 “至于过失?早就原谅了!”不过何晶并未明言和进一步解释,所谓“过失”意指什么? 同时,何晶也呼吁大家应停止在网络空间互相打击对方或任何人、国家等,要打击的是冠状病毒疫情,只有携手合作才能打败病毒。 “这是我们现下至少要做的事,尊重那些已逝者,协助那些还在为自己性命奋斗的人,并且全力支持那些前线抗疫人员。” “与此同时,保持距离,口水就留给我们自己吧,保持安全。” 尽管此前有者猜测新科工程两条设于台湾的生产线无法及时运返,曾引起新加坡的不满,不过台湾外交部则回应,新加坡政府当时出于防疫需求,也因应台湾的口罩禁令,当时已将在台湾的两条生产线转移回新加坡。再者,生产口罩的机器设备并不在限制出口范围。 早前台方也表示新台关系“长远深厚”,双边政策不会受到个人发言影响,而是继续以两地政府为主。