It has been said that roads in private residential estates are public roads and parking is allowed along these roads, the Land Transport Authority (LTA) cannot forbid any individual or company from parking.
This is the response by Minister for Transport Khaw Boon Wan to questions filed by Mr Sitoh Yih Pin Mp for Potong Pasir SMC on whether LTA can take steps to prevent transport leasing and related businesses from indiscriminately parking their commercial vehicles in non-charging parking spaces in the vicinity of landed properties in private residential estates which is causing inconvenience to residents in these estates.
Mr Khaw noted that LTA is open to suggestions from residents on how parking schemes can be improved to minimise inconvenience to them, but once instituted, these parking schemes will have to be uniformly applied to all vehicles.
However, “It’s not fair to pay to park outside our own homes”, seems to be the opinion of most of the residents who parks on the streets outside their landed homes.
The issue over whether landed home owners should pay for parking their cars on public streets outside their houses has come up again after it was announced on June 2016 that public car park rates were set to rise from December.
In Singapore, this seems to happen in low-rise residential areas where on-street parking is not priced and where spaces are not formally marked out, cars parked along the roads, making it difficult for traffic to pass in certain areas at each place.
The Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) said it provides paid parking at private estates, only when these are near commercial businesses such as food outlets or sports facilities. It added that its policies were not static and it was open to reviewing them in areas where parking demand needs to be managed.
Both Housing & Development Board (HDB) and URA said the increase to public car park rates was to recover costs of running car parks – which have increased 40 per cent since 2002, the last time fees were raised.
Experts believe the hike also signals Singapore’s push towards a car-lite society, and to send a consistent message, private property residents should have to pay for parking too.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Minister Khaw: News of the defective trains could have caused undue panic

Transport Minister Khaw Boon Wan has declared that the news of the…

TOC Editorial: Keep Kum Hong

His record speaks for itself. TOC Editorial.

民防服役人员被推入泵井溺毙:一级准尉教唆他人罪名成立

民防服役人员郭俨进中士被推入泵井溺毙一案,今日已有新进展,一级准尉法立(Mohamed Farid Mohd Saleh),被指放任其他人导致郭俨进重伤,期间并未阻止他们,犯下教唆他人做出鲁莽行为导致他人重伤的罪状,罪名成立。 《亚洲新闻台》报道,法官认为努尔法特瓦(Fatwa)的供词即使在辩护律师的严格盘问下,都有一致的证词,因此认定他为可信的证人,采纳法特瓦的供词。 法官指出,基于法特瓦在事发后坦率承认罪行,并对此认罪服刑,因此认定其证词的可信性。“在观察法特瓦的供词后,认为他确实是一个可信的证人,他的证词内涵盖真相”,法官表示。 法特瓦承认在事发当时将郭俨进推入泵井,并表示是受到法立的指示所作,他承认被指控的两项罪名:将行为鲁莽导致他人死亡罪以及妨碍司法公正罪。目前已被判处1年4星期监禁,正在服刑中。 对此,法立则声称法特瓦正在撒谎,为自己辩护,法特瓦在证词表示听见法立以马来语下指“ Wa  tolak dia ”(瓦,推他)。瓦即指法瓦特。…

What does the low Commitment to Reducing Inequality Index say of PM Lee’s pre 2015 election promises?

While Singapore has topped the Human Capital Index (HCI) released by the…