by: Ghui/

Many have called Mr Wang Pei Fei a foreign “talent” who insulted Singapore. While it’s true that Wang’s ‘foreign’, it’s not true that he is a ‘talent’ (in the sense we understand it).

Wang was an overseas student. He was not a scholar who had been offered any favours by the Singapore government. He was a paying student attending a private school. We were actually making money from him.

While I deeply abhor his comments, I cannot help but question if he is a scapegoat for a deeper issue.

Some have commented that had Wang been a Singaporean, he would have been questioned and/or detained by the authorities and implied that he was permitted to flee because he was a Chinese national.

Singapore is a multiracial country and of course no form of racism, especially on a public platform should be tolerated. But that being said, I doubt the assertion that Singaporeans would have received greater censure than Wang.

There are many remarks made along racial lines in Singapore everyday. Phrases such as “ah nei”, “turbanator”,”prata man” are but some of the derogatory racist terms hurled at the minority races in Singapore. Most notably, comments of this nature were used liberally to criticise Vikram Nair and President Nathan.

I have yet to see any Singaporean prosecuted for that. Nor have these comments attracted the furore that this video clip generated.

I am not defending Wang. All I am saying is that his comments are no worse than many racist and ignorant statements that have been uttered by Singaporeans against Singaporeans!

Perhaps, the majority are oblivious to these offensive taunts because it was not directed at them. Wang’s tirade on the other hand was; for not only did he make jibes at the Malay and Indian community, he also took pot shots at Chinese Singaporeans by making fun of their command of Mandarin. His comments on Singaporeans’ command of English likewise affected all Singaporeans, including the Chinese community.

If we demand for action to be taken against Wang, then action must also be taken against all Singaporeans who have made and who make hateful remarks along racial lines in a public forum. Punishment must also be equal for all perpetrators regardless of nationality. There cannot be one set of rules for Singaporeans and another set for foreigners who are legitimately in our country.

While there are arguments against foreigners taking up jobs meant for Singaporeans, Wang is not such a foreigner at the time the video was made. He was a fee paying student attending a private school. There is no evidence to suggest that he was working in Singapore at the time the video was made.

In our justified anger at insulting comments made about our country, we should not confuse the issues. Foreign talents taking up jobs meant for Singaporeans is a separate issue from fee paying students studying in Singapore.

Wang’s video was indeed offensive but it was no more offensive than comments that have been made by Singaporeans to other Singaporeans along racial lines. Before Singaporeans condemn Wang, we should also reflect on our own prejudices against other races within Singapore. If it is not acceptable for Wang to make such comments, it is even more unacceptable for Singaporeans to make comments of such nature against other Singaporeans. The knife should cut both ways.

Perhaps the massive reaction that Wang’s video garnered is the manifestation of the frustration of Singaporeans against the large influx of foreigners. In our frustration however, we should not confuse the issue of Wang with the issue of foreign talents. While Wang’s video is deplorable and does deserve censure, the colossal backlash it has generated is perhaps an overreaction.

His student visa has been cancelled, he has lost $10,000 and fled the country. Let’s not make this a Singaporeans versus foreigners issue.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

“你的一句话,我失去千元” 送餐员叹因电动滑板车禁令断生计

最近公布的电动滑板车禁令,尤其GrabFood送餐员受影响最甚,有者感叹道,“你的一句话,令我一夕之间少了1200元收入,怎么办?”。 陆路交通管理局于周一(11月5日)发出禁止电动滑板车在人行道上行驶,只能在脚车道和公共连接道上行驶的禁令,周二开始宽限期至今年年杪,明年正式开始实施。违规者一旦被定罪,将面对不超过2000元的罚款,以及不超过三个月的监禁。 这直接影响了我国超过7000名,采用电动滑板车送货的送餐员,且大部分都是GrabFood送餐伙伴成员。 一名GrabFood送餐员希瓦(Siva)就在脸书群组 SG Confessions上帖文,分享有关禁令对其生计带来的严重影响。 希瓦指出,他指2018年开始成为送餐员,而身为一名工艺教育学院(ITE)毕业生的他,正业是一名白领上班族,月入2200元,没有花红且只能领三日病假。但是自从当GrabFood送餐员开始,他每个月可以获得3500元的收入。 他表示,3500元的收入,加上妻子的2000元月入,让他们觉得目前是建立家庭的好时机,他们更购买了一间位于蔡厝港,价值25万元的预购组屋(BTO)。 我帮助国家,它却不愿帮我 但是有关的禁令,却令他措手不及,“这意味着我将只能回到原点,月入突然少了1200元。我还需要为我的宝宝买尿片、奶粉,以及看护保姆,现在简直入不敷出了。” 他指出,他已经依着政府的指示行使,包括购买有UL2272认证的滑板车、小心驾驶(甚至保持两年不曾撞过任何人的记录)、注册个人代步工具、持有稳定工作、成家生子,他都一一做了。“但是政府还是下达了禁令,将能够让我获得良好收入的工作夺走了。” “我想成为好公民,通过工作和生子来帮助国家,我想帮助我的国家,但是我的国家现在不想帮助我。”…

2 vaccination centres set up, with 8 more on the way by end February; seniors to start being vaccinated

The government is on track to have 10 COVID-19 vaccination centres by…

北京、上海落实“封闭式管理”

中国北京政府本月9日发布“疫情防控通告严格居住小区封闭式管理”,而上海市虽然没有发出正式通告,但是该市表示目前市内的1万3000个居民社区已经落实“封闭式管理”。 随着和北京都进入封闭式管理,中国四大直辖市-北京、天津、上海和重庆都实施了封闭式管理措施,中国大陆的新型冠状病毒的严峻疫情亦引来各界关注。 北京官方对出十项措施,包括进入封闭式管理的市区,外来车辆和人员不得入城,社区输入口数量遭到严格控制,而甫抵达境内的人员也必须登记个人资讯和报告健康状况,如测试体温等。若发现有体温异常的人士,将依据既定的“全链条处置机制”,即刻将他移送并上卫健委报告。 通告指出,抵达北京前14天内,凡是曾抵达疫区或与疫区人员接触的人们,都必须根据规定接受检查或居家检查,主动报告健康状况,并且配合相关管理进行家中隔离。任何违规或拒绝接受医学、居家观察者,都将受到严厉处罚。 北京社区内的各机关单位及企业严加监控人员提问,而非生活所需公共场所一律关闭,房屋中介和房东则必须向当地负责单位报告租客和承租人的个资,已进行人数监管及防疫工作。 上海:防输入、社区防扩散、筛查 上海方面则采取了筑牢“三道防护圈”的防控策略,即道口防输入、社区防扩散、以及集中力量抓筛查和救治。 上海市防控工作领导小组办公室主任顾洪辉表示,当局强调必须严防死守这个超大型城市和国际枢纽,并通过三个管道掌握资讯,即大资料推送的名单、各交通道口推送的咨询,以及来自各区、街镇的自拍自查。 截止10日下午2时30分(当地时间),上海市官方声称已经发现299起新冠确诊病例、1起死亡病例、48人治愈出院,以及1062起可疑病例。