Source: MOE / Gilbert Goh

On Thursday (28 November), activist and founder of Transitioning.org (a support site for the unemployed) Gilbert Goh sent an email to the Education Minister Ong Ye Kung urging his Ministry to waive off unpaid school fees and return students’ result slips.
In an earlier Facebook post on Monday (25 November), Mr Goh highlighted the plight of a student whose original Primary School Leaving Examination (PLSE) result slip was withheld by the Ministry of Education (MOE), as her parents had incurred S$156 in unpaid school fees. Eventually, a Good Samaritan paid the school fees for the student so that she can get her original PSLE result slip.
In response to this, MOE told Yahoo! News Singapore the next day (26 November) that the real aim of doing so “stems from the underlying principle that notwithstanding the fact that the cost of education is almost entirely publicly funded, we should still play our part in paying a small fee, and it is not right to ignore that obligation, however small it is”.
“Further, students from lower-income families can apply for financial assistance that covers their miscellaneous fees, uniforms, textbooks, transport and school meals. If it is about money then the easier solution would be to reduce subsidies and financial assistance,” it added.
Sharing the email following the previous exchanges on Transitioning.org, Mr Goh said that although he applauds the Ministry of Education’s (MOE) “laudable financial assistance scheme (FAS) which benefitted thousands of needy students each year”, but some students may not receive them due to many other reasons.
“However, it came to our attention that some students may fall through the crack when it comes to application of FAS due to various unique reasons – incomplete filling of forms due to a missing family member, sudden loss of a breadwinner through retrenchment or just missing out on the FAS criteria mark of S$2750 gross income per household or S$690 per capita income,” the activist wrote.
He added that some may even feel ashamed to apply for financial help “due to their ego and prefer to tough it out worsening the problem for the innocent child”.

Adopt a compassionate approach in dealing with needy families

As such, Mr Goh stated that the schools should be more proactive in identifying “vulnerable students who have a prolonged accumulation of school fees for more than six months”. This is because not paying their fees for such a long period of time is a clear sign that things may not be so good at home.
He suggested that “the school counsellor can attend to such cases to nip it in the bud before the situation deteriorates further”.
He added that to simply expect families to come forward and apply for FAS may not be possible with “some families who are either lowly-educated or swamped with their own personal issues”.
“They need a gentle nudge, a loving compassionate touch to show that the school is also caring out than the current institutional trend of coldness and aloofness when it comes to handling families living in poverty,” he wrote.
He continued, “Mr Ong, I hope that you will agree with me that we need to change our approach in handling those who could not pay their school fees as simply denying their original examination certificate is not the right solution to solve a longstanding problem.”
Therefore, Mr Goh urges MOE to “consider waving off these unpaid fees in a special compassionate goodwill gesture so that our needy children could finally receive their educational certificates”.
He also noted that by denying a child’s original result slip, it sends mixed signal to the child as he or she may feel “marginalised and punished for his parent’s fault”.
“It will also stir up anger and shame within the child who is still too young to comprehend the whole matter properly. Often, the child may feel that he is at fault lapsing into adverse emotional backlash or he may lay the blame squarely on his family which is also unhealthy,” Mr Goh explained.
If the Ministry can’t offer this special waiver, then Mr Goh said that his organisation will try collecting the funds through crowdfunding in order to pay back all the backlogged school fees over the years so the students can get their original certificate.
“We want to work hand in hand with the ministry to resolve a complicated long-standing matter and hopefully we can groom children to be responsible and compassionate despite their family situation,” he penned.
Faced similar situation in school
In the email, the activist said that he is passionate about this matter as he was raised in a poor environment himself, and could not attend kindergarten as his family could not afford the school fees.
“Every morning, I would run to the school and peep in from outside the gate entrance gawking in envy at those who could attend the sessions. From a very young age, I was also fostered out for a long ten years due to the fact that my parents have to work very long hours to make ends meet. I felt abandoned and could never understand why we have to leave our parents and stay with strangers,” he said.
He added, “My childhood experience has scarred me for life but it has also toughened me up a lot as I always feel much for the underdogs and try to speak up for them whenever possible. I am writing this with tears streaming down my cheeks as it is never easy to come to terms with any childhood scars often embedded deep within our memory and any healing is a life-long struggle.”
Given his personal struggle as a child, Mr Goh pleaded to the Education Ministry to rethink the Ministry’s decision to hold students’ result certificate until outstanding payments are made.
He said that it’s not only cruel but also “psychologically damaging” to a child’s esteem.
“I am also open to a face-to-face meeting with you so that we can discuss this matter openly and cordially,” he wrote at the end of his email.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【舆论】集选区制度形同“买一送一配套”

日前,荣誉国务资政吴作栋在接受《海峡时报》专访时,捍卫集选区和市镇理事会制度,也认为这些都是有助我国政治体制的“稳定器”。 对此工人党前非选区议员余振忠,也提醒如今集选区制度也成了行动党的双刃剑,一旦在野党团队更为强大,有关集选区就成了在野党堡垒区,行动党不容易夺回。 再者,余振忠也强调,若要新加坡有真正的”稳定器“,那么就应确保集选区和市镇会的交接工作,都是负责任、不偏袒的。 事实上,除了余振忠的上述分析,集选区另一备受争议的要点,正是减少选民的选择权益。 在集选区,朝野政党都是以团队形式上阵,“选民是选择一组配套,而不是选择单一的候选人。”即使团队中一些候选人选民不需要,但要么投选整支团队,要么拉倒。 再者,一些较不具备素质的候选人,也大可在民望较高候选人的庇护下,成功跻身国会。 就拿最近选举“林绍权”风波来说吧。若不是林绍权主动在提名日前提辞呈不参选,裕廊集选区选民可能面对一种两难处境:投选更有民望和胜算的尚达曼,与此同时,还“附送”一个选民们原本就不需要的林绍权。这不是让选民们难做吗? 至于副总理王瑞杰最后一分钟移师东海岸集选区,他曾解释是因为担心东海岸在原议员林瑞生和李奕贤退位后,不忍后续无人才转战于此。 除了王瑞杰外,行动党在该区其他候选人还包括国防部兼外交部高级政务部长孟理齐博士、陈舜娘和陈慧玲,以及新人陈杰豪。 然而这一举动,亦可视作要保障东海岸选票的策略,必须派“强人”驻守。但与此同时,是否选民只是因为要投选王瑞杰,才在该区给予行动党委托呢?那么为何要纳税人承担和支付更多议员的薪资?集选区真的有更好地反映选民的实际选择吗?  

KPMG has criticised the WP for things that its fellow industry colleague, PWC are also guilty of

Based on the snippets that have been published in the press about…