Photo from Shutterstock.com

In a family disagreement over the ownership of a Housing and Development Board (HDB) flat, Madam Tan Teck Soon, 76, has resorted to suing her two granddaughters for trying to sell the flat she has been living in for over two decades .
According to the court affidavit, Mdm Tan states that she has paid the Housing Board S$277 each month in mortgage instalments over 26 years to service the housing loan for the 10th-storey 3-room flat in Bedok South. She also paid S$20,000 for the downpayment and renovations. Overall, she says that she has paid over S$117,000, including upgrading costs and conservancy charges.
However, in March earlier this year, she found out that her granddaughters, 26-year-old Michelle Ng Li Xuan and 25-year-old Isabella Ng Su Xi were planning to sell off the flat and had begun looking for buyers, a move which would force her to move out.
In order to prevent this, she has sued the two granddaughters.
Although Madam Tan maintains that she paid for the flat, her two granddaughters are the flat’s registered owners. They had inherited the flat when their father passed away after a heart attack in 2009.
The flat was originally bought in 1990 under the name of the sisters’ father, and Madam Tan’s son, Mr Ng King Nguang.
In 1992, Madam Tan was registered as co-owner of the flat after a previous flat she co-owned with her eldest son was sold.
However, seven years later in 1999, Madam Tan transferred her ownership to her son to help him.  This allowed him to obtain a HDB loan to pay off about S$100,000 in debts.
Madam Tan claims that she did not receive any money from the sale of her share of the flat, and she even lent Mr Ng S$61,000 to pay back his creditors.
Madam Tan has insisted that while the flat was bought under her son’s name, it was her making all payments for it and there was an agreement between them that the flat belonged to her.
“The flat was registered under Ng’s sole name at that time, with the understanding between Ng and me that I was the sole owner,” she said.
Nevertheless, Madam Tan’s granddaughters have countered her statements, saying that they have the right to put the flat up for sale as it is their inheritance. Additionally, they have also disputed Madam Tan’s claims that she single-handedly paid for the flat.
“What I understand is that my dad was the one doing the payments,” said Ms Michelle Ng. She added that she and her sister let Madam Tan live in the flat as it was close to her workplace. Madam Tan works as a school canteen vendor.
Ms Ng also said that the payments that Madam Tan made for the flat after Mr Ng’s death were because Madam Tan was living in the flat at the time. She also stated that she and her sister had offered Madam Tan a place to stay with Ms Isabella Ng at her upcoming Built To Order (BTO) flat in Choa Chu Kang.
Still Madam Tan brought the case to the High Court, where she is being represented by lawyer Chia Boon Teck, who is taking on the case pro bono.
Madam Tan argues that her granddaughters are only holding the flat in trust for her and that she found out that they were planning to sell it to profit.
On the other hand, the two sisters denied trying to sell the flat without Madam Tan’s knowledge.
After the death of the owner of a HDB flat, the deceased’s interest in the flat will be distributed according to the will. If there is no will, it will be distributed according to the provisions of the Intestate Succession Act.
Madam Tan still resides in HDB flat and the family’s case is currently pending in the High Court.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Triumph over tragedy: Thai mother’s inspiring recovery after airport travelator accident leads to amputation

Supahnee Kittirattana, a Thai mother who suffered a tragic accident leading to leg amputation, is now defying all odds, taking her first steps and inspiring the nation with her remarkable recovery and indomitable spirit.

食物中毒事件 受影响Sparkletots幼儿园增至13间

人民行动党社区基金会(PCF)旗下 Sparkletots幼儿园食物中毒事件发生至今已经迈入第三周,受影响的幼儿园从原本的四间、到七间,如今再增加至13间,多达229宗病例,而入院的31名孩童中,只剩下一人尚在住院,情况稳定,其他的已经回家。 人民行动党社区基金会发言人星期一(4月1日)指出,截至上周五(3月29日),出现食物中毒现象的孩童一共有224人,其中29人需要入院就医。在隔日,又有另外五名孩童的家长通报幼儿园,指孩子出现类似现象,其中两人需要入院,目前仅剩一名孩童在院中留医,情况稳定。 Sparkletots幼儿园的学生和教职员是在上个月,因为食用外包供应商 Kate’s Catering的外包餐后,出现呕吐、腹泻、发高烧的症状。有关的事项是经由该幼儿园发给一名家长的电邮而爆发,电邮内容指榜鹅北的Sparkletots幼儿园有学生出现疑似食物中毒的现象,而该幼儿园的外包餐饮供应商执照也被吊销了。 教职员情况良好 发言人也表示,12名受影响的职员无需入院,目前他们的情况良好。 受影响的地点包括了位于盛港中路第208座、210座、231座、262A座、270座、290A座、298B座、榜鹅北、榜鹅海岸路第303A座、326座、巴耶利峇第221座、大巴窑中路第146A座和79B座的幼儿园。 发言人表示,校方一直和受影响孩童的家长保持密切联系,留意孩童的情况,也帮助需要经济援助的家长,应付孩子们在此次事件中的医药费。 Sparkletots属下的356所幼儿园将继续保持警惕,每天进行体温测量和幼儿园清洗消毒工作。 他也表示,将继续和卫生部、国家环境局以及其他机构合作进行调查。

Reviving the Minimum Wage Debate (Part 2)

Gordon Lee/ In Part 2, we study costs of production, inflation, productivity…

网络公审不戴口罩者 乔立盟吁应先理解背景

我国自上周开始落实阻断措施,国人受促非必要别出门,且4月14日已宣布,出门必须戴口罩。 不过近期网络上也广传各种“网络公审”的现象,一些民众充当“义警”,拍摄那些不戴口罩的民众,对此人民党主席乔立盟认为这种现象不可取,也提醒不是每个人都拿到口罩,或有者无法接触信息和更新当前的政策更新。 他坦言,一些视频中甚至用非常难听的语调谴责,甚至于在指定地区用餐的送餐员也饱受困扰,吃个饭都不能安生。 他强调不会认同那些故意不戴口罩或不负责任的行为,但与此同时,他对那些无法待在家、或有失智或其他症状的老人家深表同情。 乔立盟称,我们需要的是协助这些群体、了解他们为何不戴口罩、或为何不得已在外头闲逛。 他也提醒不是每个人都能接触到最新的新闻信息、或是了解在哪里可以领取口罩,甚至有者未意识到我国的口罩政策已改变。