Yee
Yee
Yee

16-year old blogger Amos Yee explained in court documents that his intention in critiquing Christianity and Lee Kuan Yew is to open discussions on what he saw as “problems” with the faith and Singapore.

The teenager said that he was aware his critique would lead some people to take offence, but that this promoted discussion, which, he added, “was healthy for positive change to take place in future.”

Amos Yee is being charged for remarks he made in a video on the death of the late Lee Kuan Yew, Singapore’s former prime minister.

The authorities say the video “contained remarks against Christianity, with the deliberate intention of wounding the religious feelings of Christians in general”.

He is also being charged for a caricature of Mr Lee and the late British prime minister, Margaret Thatcher, which the authorities say is an offence under Singapore’s obscenity laws.

After his video on Mr Lee was uploaded, Amos Yee said there were positive and negative comments from the public, and that he was “pleased that my video had opened up a bigger avenue to look at religion objectively, instead of mere blind faith.”

He said he had concerns about the Christian faith and that the “the only way to rectify the problem is to criticize the problems head-on.”

He explained that while he “was aware that critiquing these problems (with the Christian faith) would promote ill-will”, he saw this as “a natural consequence”, and that “promoting ill-will is a prerogative for positive change to happen in society, especially if the issue at hand were initially controversial.”

The teen said he was born into a Catholic family and was raised a Catholic.

However, in 2013, when he was about to be confirmed as a Catholic (which is a practice in the Church known as “Confirmation”), he “started to question the implications” of it.

He then began to conduct his own research into the faith by watching online videos on Youtube and reading blog posts.

His finding, from these, and other “emotional catalysts” such as being “kicked out” of the altar boys group for swearing, resulted in him disengaging from the Church altogether in 2013, he said.

Earlier this year, he observed that “there was huge outpouring of grief online and in the mainstream media” when Mr Lee passed away.

He said this “piqued” his interest and he decided to conduct more research on Mr Lee. He visited blogger Roy Ngerng’s website, had discussions with supporters of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), and read Mr Lee’s book, “Lee Kuan Yew: The Man And His Ideas”, which he had borrowed from Toa Payoh library.

“After my research, I realised that he was a horrible man and that some of his policies were inane,” Amos Yee said.

Subsequently, he decided to make a video on Mr Lee’s death, in which he also drew comparisons between Mr Lee and Jesus Christ.

Amos Yee said he has been making videos since he was 12-years old.

He had also won two awards – Best Actor and Best Short Film – for one of his films, “Jan”, three years ago in The New Paper’s first film award competition, beating 160 other entries.

In the 8-minute video on Mr Lee, titled “Lee Kuan Yew is finally dead!”, where he spoke some 1,200 words, Amos Yee mentioned “Jesus Christ” once, and “Christian” twice.

Before uploading the video online, he asked two of his friends if the video would be legal, but both gave him inconclusive answers.

He then looked up the Sedition Act to see if his video would contravene the law.

“However, after reading through the Act, I remained unsure as to the legality of my video,” he said in the court documents.

Nonetheless, he said he “was aware that the contents of the video were seditious in nature” but he was unsure if his actions would land him in jail.

He decided to go ahead and upload the video after he saw how others “whose opinions were published online and promoted a lot of ill-will, continued to publish these opinions of theirs and were not charged under the Sedition Act.”

He thus did not think that his actions (in uploading the video online) would be deemed illegal.

After the video became public, the teenager said he noticed that the majority of online comments in reaction to it were “hate-filled messages”.

But he said he expected this “as the content was meant to be controversial.”

There were also, he noted, “a noticeable amount of people who agreed with my views and supported my stance.”

The video has thus far been viewed more than a million times on Youtube.

Amos Yee also revealed in his court documents that he “began receiving death threats and hate messages online and on my mobile phone.”

He said he was “not overly concerned” by these as he felt most of them were baseless and were “not steeped in logic.”

“Besides, despite the hatred and ill-will generated from my video, it opened up a larger avenue for critical discussion towards Lee Kuan Yew, thus raising awareness to the inherent problems of Singapore,” he said.

Amos Yee was assaulted outside the State Court about a week ago as he made his way to a pre-trial conference.

A 49-year old man is reported to have been arrested for the assault since, and police say investigations are ongoing.

As for the caricature of Mr Lee and Mrs Thatcher portrayed in an unflattering manner, Amos Yee said he came up with the image after learning that Mrs Thatcher had once said Mr Lee “was always right.”

The teenager felt that this was an “overgeneralisation” and “too sweeping to be objectively true.”

His intention in making the image was thus to make fun of Mrs Thatcher’s claim, and to encourage more people to “openly criticise and make fun of their political leaders.”

This, he said, “opens up a larger avenue for critical analysis and positive change in Singapore.”

Amos Yee said he refuses to remove any of the videos he has made, or the post about Mr Lee and Mrs Thatcher, “because it would not appease the public”, and also it would suggest that he was sorry for the videos and the blog post, which he is in fact not sorry for.

He explained that he was not remorseful for his actions because while he knows that they are offensive, “that is an aspect for freedom of speech and positive change to occur.”

Amos Yee had ended his video expressing hope that Singapore would see positive changes, especially with a general election expected to be called soon.

“[There] is  high chance that us, citizens of Singapore, things can finally change for the better,” he said in the video. “Let’s all hope for change, for good change, for every possible kind.”

After the hearing on Wednesday, the teenager’s lawyer, Alfred Dodwell, said his client was in good spirits.

“He believes that he’s done nothing wrong, stands by what he says, and this is the very reason why he is in remand, because he refuses to be gagged,” Mr Dodwell said.

The parents of the 16-year old were in court to lend support to their son yesterday, along with friends and supporters of Amos Yee.

The two-day trial, presided by District Judge Jasvendar Kaur, continues on Friday afternoon.

Read also: “Amos Yee pleads not guilty, in good spirits”.

Subscribe
Notify of
193 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Buying trophy properties in a country

Before Chinese New Year, hubby told me he had prepared new banknotes…

How civil service can serve better

(The following letter to TODAY Voices was rejected for publication.) See Leong…

刘太格强调属个人意见 一千万人口规划旨在防患未然

一千万人口课题成为我国本届大选的热门话题之一,然而新加坡规划大师刘太格表示,并没有太注意这些朝野争议,仅强调一千万人口不是目标,而是国家的最坏打算。 现年82岁的刘太格于日前接受《联合早报》访问,他曾于1969年担任建屋局局长兼总建筑师至1989年,之后担任市区重建局局长兼总规划师至1992年。他在我国于2013年发表人口白皮书后,就多次呼吁政府要做长远打算,在进行城市规划上,要以2100年会出现一千万人口作为基准。 他重申需要做长远打算的立场。“万一达到1000万,我们是有准备的。” 在本届大选中,民主党的竞选宣言“4Y1N”(四要一不)中的不要,就是拒绝一千万人口规划,质疑政府的人口目标。人民行动党驳斥有关指控,强调没有做过以上发言,更指民主党散播假消息。随后,一千万人口规划课题就似乎成为每个候选人访谈和辩论上的课题了。 原副总理王瑞杰也声称,自己没认可刘太格的主张,在去年三月底论坛只是解释人口规模不单只是实体空间,也包含社会空间,以及如何保有凝聚力。不过,他也提及我国人口密度还不算过高,还有其他城市在宜居空间方面更加拥挤。 刘太格强调,在离开公共服务领域后,就没有和任何与政治或政治领导的人物交往,更强调以一千万人口作为规划基准,一直都是他的“个人意见”。 他指出,依据一千万人口的基准提前规划好国家,能够确保国民拥有足够的高速公路和地铁路线,保存我国的绿地和古建筑物等城市环境,更不会在事情发生时才措手不及。 在受访时,他忆述曾于1991年规划我国人口在百年后达到550万,而当前我国人口已经约571万人了,比他预估的早了70年。 他表示,只要政府能够有效运作,且国家经济获得良好发展,我国的就业岗位就会增加,人口也随着剧增。 刘太格坦承,他了解民众对我国基板设施是否能够应付庞大人口,大量引进移民是否导致人口增加的忧虑。惟,他认为基本设施服务属行政管理课题,而引进外国人口也不能说只有缺点,他们也带来了很多正面的影响。对此,他也感到忧虑,因为国人的思维似乎过于单一化了。