Uncategorized
Honour in Singapore Q&A – A little more about "honour"
As TOC’s “Honour in Singapore” series drew to a close, we sent a number of queries to Honour (Singapore)’s chairman Lim Siong Guan and executive director Jason Wong to clarify on some of the issues we raised. They declined a recorded interview, opting for an email response instead.
The following are their answers, which we have presented in two parts due to their length, according to the question type. All answers are attributable to Mr Lim Siong Guan unless otherwise stated. They have requested us to present their answers without comment, so that you may make your conclusions about them on your own.
———-
Why did you choose the term “honour”, given that it is a highly subjective term that means different things to different cultures, even within Singapore?
The virtue of honour is advocated by all cultures, races and religions. The fact that it could mean different things to different people underlines the point that it is a prevalent virtue that can manifest itself in many different ways, from little courtesies like small kindnesses and being on time for appointments, to honouring parents and strengthening family ties, to employers paying wages on time and CEOs valuing their people.
Honour (Singapore) seeks to promote a culture of honour and honouring in Singapore. We believe Singapore’s success owes much to us being a people who honour our word. And going into the future, we need to be a people who are prepared to honour each other by being willing to hear each other’s views and seeking to understand one another even though our opinions may differ on how to create the best conditions for success for our children and grandchildren.
How do you feel Singaporeans are lacking in honour – specifically, what studies have you done to ascertain this lack – such that an NPO like Honour (Singapore) is necessary?
We started Honour (Singapore) not because Singaporeans have lost the sense of honour, but because we believe it is a virtue all Singaporeans should uphold as critical for both our success of the past and a good way into the future. We seek to draw out what so many Singaporeans already instinctively feel in their hearts and minds, and hope to perpetuate for the well-being of the generations to come.
To help understand our perspective, we should start by asking ourselves what is the difference between “liking” and “loving”. We would soon come to realize that “liking” is when something or someone pleases us in some way, while “loving” is when we seek to do what is good for the other person. Seen in this way, liking is self-centred while loving is other-centred. Similarly, honour is other-centred; honour is what we offer to other people because we care about them as human beings and fellow citizens.
Will your charter also include asking the government to honour its promises to Singaporeans made over the years, and if so, in what aspect will this be done?
Honour (Singapore) does not seek to tell people or organisations what to do. This has to apply to our perspective on the government also. We are not an advocacy group on government or public policies. Our agenda is narrowly focused and limited to promoting a culture of honour and honouring as our contribution to the well-being of the nation.
It was noted that you have the same office as FGB Singapore, which you said was done to get things going quickly. Can none of the board of directors afford to pay for a separate office space?
As Honour (Singapore) grows in its reach and its activities, it would have to move to a larger office. We would welcome offers of suitable space at suitably attractive rentals.
What exactly are the activities that Honour (Singapore) has planned for?
We have to reach all segments of Singapore society: schools, families, businesses, workplaces, community groups. We will be happy to give talks or participate in events if we are invited to do so. We also have a website that points to articles and presentations which convey how honour may be manifested in different ways, and also a blog site that presents perspectives on honour each week.
We are developing four programmes for different audiences: These are Leading with Honour, for those who are leading groups of people; Living with Honour, for everyone who wishes to understand how little acts of honour in daily living build community and friendships; Loving with Honour, for those who would see honour as the basis for strong families and long-term personal relationships; and Learning with Honour, for those who see learning as what empowers them to realise their potential in life.
We note that one of the requirements for obtaining IPC status requires you to list all past or planned activities. Very little was revealed to the public in this aspect about Honour (Singapore), so how then did you obtain IPC status? Did a Minister have to support the application, and if so, which one?
Honour (Singapore) did not raise our application for IPC status with any Minister. We submitted our application as required by the Commissioner of Charities.
———-
Top image – Honour (Singapore) website.
The “Honour in Singapore” series includes:
- Part 1 – Defining honour, for what purpose?
- Part 2 – About chairman Lim Siong Guan
- Part 3 – About executive director Jason Wong
- Part 4 – Keepers of the “gates”
- Part 5 – Strong government endorsement warranted?
- Part 6 – Relooking objectives and funding
Like this article? Support us so that we can do more. Subscribe to TOC here.
Indonesia
Miss Universe cuts ties with Indonesia chapter after harassment allegations
The Miss Universe Organization severs ties with Indonesia franchise due to harassment claims. Malaysia edition canceled.
Women allege body checks before pageant. Investigation launched. Safety prioritized.
Indonesia winner to compete in November finale. Height requirement controversy.
WASHINGTON, UNITED STATES — The Miss Universe Organization has cut ties with its Indonesia franchise, it announced days after allegations of sexual harassment, and will cancel an upcoming Malaysia edition.
In the complaint, more than a half dozen women said all 30 finalists for Miss Universe Indonesia were unexpectedly asked to strip for a supposed body check for scars and cellulite two days before the pageant’s crowning ceremony in Jakarta.
Their lawyer said Tuesday that five of the women had their pictures taken.
“In light of what we have learned took place at Miss Universe Indonesia, it has become clear that this franchise has not lived up to our brand standards, ethics, or expectations,” the US-based Miss Universe Organization posted Saturday night on social media site X, formerly known as Twitter.
It said that it had “decided to terminate the relationship with its current franchise in Indonesia, PT Capella Swastika Karya, and its National Director, Poppy Capella.”
It thanked the contestants for their bravery in coming forward and added that “providing a safe place for women” was the organization’s priority.
Jakarta police spokesman Trunoyudo Wisnu Andiko said Tuesday that an investigation into the women’s complaint has been launched.
The Indonesia franchise also holds the license for Miss Universe Malaysia, where there will no longer be a competition this year, according to the New York-based parent organizer.
In a lengthy statement posted to Instagram, Indonesia franchise director Capella denied involvement in any body checks.
“I, as the National Director and as the owner of the Miss Universe Indonesia license, was not involved at all and have never known, ordered, requested or allowed anyone who played a role and participated in the process of organizing Miss Universe Indonesia 2023 to commit violence or sexual harassment through body checking,” she wrote.
She added that she is against “any form of violence or sexual harassment.”
The Jakarta competition was held from 29 July to 3 August to choose Indonesia’s representative to the 2023 Miss Universe contest, and was won by Fabienne Nicole Groeneveld.
Miss Universe said it would make arrangements for her to compete in the finale, scheduled for November in El Salvador.
This year’s Indonesia pageant also came under fire for announcing a “significant change in this (year’s) competition guidelines” with the elimination of its minimum height requirement after it had crowned a winner.
In its statement, the Miss Universe Organization said it wanted to “make it extremely clear that there are no measurements such as height, weight, or body dimensions required to join a Miss Universe pageant worldwide.”
— AFP
Malaysia
A Perodua service centre in Kuantan, Malaysia went viral for its strict dress code, Perodua responds
A dress code for vehicle servicing? A Malaysian car brand’s service centre dress code signage has puzzled netizens, raising queries about the need for attire rules during a routine service.
The manufacturer responded with an official statement after a flurry of comments, seeking to clarify and apologize.
MALAYSIA: A dress code signage positioned at a service centre belonging to a prominent Malaysian car brand has sparked bewilderment among Malaysian netizens, who question the necessity of adhering to attire guidelines for a simple vehicle servicing.
The signage explicitly delineates clothing items that are deemed unsuitable, including sleeveless tops, short skirts, abbreviated pants, and distressed jeans.
The car manufacturer swiftly found itself flooded with comments from both inquisitive and irked Malaysian netizens. This surge in online activity prompted the company to issue an official statement aimed at clarifying the situation and extending an apology.
In a post that gained significant traction on the social media platform, politician Quek Tai Seong of Pahang State, Malaysia, shared an image to Facebook on Monday (7 Aug).
The image showcased a dress code sign prominently displayed at a Perodua Service Centre in Kuantan. Within the post, Quek posed the question: “Is this dress code applicable nationwide, or is it specific to this branch?”
The signage reads, “All customers dealing with Perodua Service Kuantan 1, Semambu, are requested to dress modestly and appropriately.”
Adding visual clarity to these guidelines, the sign features illustrative graphics that explicitly outline clothing items deemed unacceptable, including sleeveless tops, short skirts, short pants, and ripped jeans.
Delineating the specifics of the dress code, the signage stipulates that male visitors are expected to don shirts accompanied by neckties, opt for long pants, and wear closed shoes.
Conversely, female visitors are advised to don long-sleeved shirts, full-length skirts, and closed-toe footwear.
Perodua’s dress code sparks online uproar
Following the rapid spread of the post, Perodua’s official Facebook page found itself inundated with comments from both intrigued and frustrated Malaysian netizens, all seeking clarifications about the newly surfaced dress code policy.
Amidst the flurry of comments, numerous incensed netizens posed pointed questions such as, “What is the rationale behind the introduction of such regulations by the management? We demand an explanation.”
Another netizen expressed their dissatisfaction, arguing against the necessity of the rule and urging Perodua to take inspiration from the practices of other 4S (Sales, Service, Spare Parts, and Survey) automotive dealerships.
A concerned Facebook user chimed in, advocating for a more lenient stance, asserting that attempting to dictate customers’ clothing choices might not be in the company’s best interest.
Someone also commented in an angry tone, “Oi what is this? Going there for car service, not interview or working, right.”
As the discourse unfolded, it became evident that while some inquiries carried genuine weight, others chose to inject humor into the situation, playfully remarking, “If I wanted to buy a Myvi, I should buy or rent a formal attire first.”
“I sell economy rice at a hawker centre, I have never worn a long sleeve shirt and a tie… I guess I will not buy a Perodua car then.”
“I guess they will not serve those who wear short pants.”
Perodua addresses dress code controversy
As reported by Chinese media outlet Sin Chew Daily News, the manager of Kuantan’s Perodua Service Centre had acknowledged that the images on the dress code signage were misleading.
In response, the manager divulged that discussions had transpired with the head office, leading to the prompt removal of the signage to prevent any further misconceptions.
The manager clarifies, “We do encourage visitors to adhere to the dress etiquette, but we won’t go to the extent of restricting their choice of attire.”
He also revealed that currently, no complaints have been directly received from the public.
However, feedback from certain customers was relayed through Perodua’s agents.
Perodua also released an official statement by chief operating officer JK Rozman Jaffar on Wednesday (9 Aug) regarding the dress code on their official Facebook page.
The statement stated the dress code etiquette is not aligned with their official guidelines and they are currently conducting an official investigation on the matter followed by corrective measures to avoid the same incident from happening.
Perodua also extends its apologies for any inconvenience caused.
-
Singapore5 days ago
Singapore woman’s suicide amidst legal battle raises concerns over legal system
-
Singapore1 day ago
Minister K Shanmugam transfers Astrid Hill GCB to UBS Trustees for S$88 Million following Ridout Road controversy
-
Diplomacy1 week ago
India PM Narendra Modi meets with PM Lawrence Wong; Four MoUs signed
-
Parliament3 days ago
Minister Shanmugam rejects request for detailed information on visa-free visitor offences: Cites bilateral considerations
-
Opinion1 week ago
Singaporean voters and the ‘Battered Wife Syndrome’
-
Parliament4 days ago
PAP MPs attack WP Gerald Giam in Parliament over NTUC independence from ruling party
-
Politics1 week ago
PAP adopts SDP policies after criticizing them: Dr Chee urges Singaporeans to see through tactics
-
Food1 week ago
NTU stall food prices questioned after parent pays S$6.30 for meal