The following is a media release by SOS Bukit Brown in response to Minister of State Tan Chuan-Jin’s note 'Bukit Brown…work in progress':

In response to Minister of State, Mr Tan Chuan-Jin’s note posted on Friday, 3 February 2012 at 17:42.

SOS Bukit Brown stand by the position of our petition and we reiterate the need for a fundamental review and open dialogue about the future of Singapore.

We are glad that Mr Tan Chuan-Jin managed to spend time on Bukit Brown with the documentation team.

Mr. Tan has also highlighted the need for land for more housing and this has opened up the debate about overall land needs in Singapore, as well as the increased demand for more land/space that arises from a rising population.

We are sorry to hear that Mr Tan still prioritises construction and the ultimate destruction of Bukit Brown.

The proposed highway will only serve the small and possibly declining population of car owners in Singapore while the whole of Singapore will have to live with the negative consequences resulting from the destruction of Bukit Brown. SingStat notes that there are only 111 cars per 1000 people in Singapore and the government has announced plans to control the car population.

Urbanisation of Bukit Brown will contribute to the devastation of Singapore’s natural environment. It will have potential environmental consequences such as increased flooding, higher local temperatures and contribution to climate change. The recently released “Report by the Expert Panel on Drainage Design and Flood Protection Measures” states that urbanisation is a key cause for the recent spate of flooding in Singapore. The report further notes that Bukit Brown is in the Marina Basin drainage area – the same as the flood-prone Bukit Timah and Orchard Road areas. Building up Bukit Brown will be deadly to the wildlife, including the 13 species of endangered birds that inhabit the wooded area there.

Destruction of Bukit Brown will also contribute to the loss of the Singapore identity and heritage. As the first municipal cemetery of Singapore, 100,000 members of our pioneering generation are laid to rest there from as early as 1830s. These people have helped to make the success of Singapore today and Bukit Brown is the last place ordinary Singaporeans can collectively venerate them.

It is important that Singaporeans treasure our natural environment and history as it is what makes us Singaporean.

Simply creating more highways and housing estates is not the ideal long-term solution towards a more sustainable future for Singapore.

We are happy that Mr Tan has been open about his views. We believe it is now necessary for a fundamental review and open dialogue with all Singaporeans about the future of Singapore.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

认为薪资不如拭子测试员? 何晶:那就自愿去参与啊

政府招募拭子检测人员,开价3800月薪,却引发部分医护人员不满,有护士在网络发文,直指拥有专业背景的护士薪资,起薪竟不如非专业的拭子检测员。 卫生部曾在14日回应,拭子检测工作属于短期合约,与全职医护专业人士不同,并没有任何升迁的机会,也不会给予额外的补贴或花红。 不过,总理夫人何晶对此也有话说。她在昨日(17日)的贴文称,如果任何人认为自己的薪资不如拭子测试员,那么就停止抱怨,自愿去接受培训,去做测试工作。 他指出,自愿者大多受训来从事一些有薪短期工作,包括行政、检测、清洁、照顾病患、后勤、司机等等支援工作。但当局不会把他们的善意和公共精神视为理所当然,仍会合理给予报酬,自然比那些较轻松、安全的工作,报酬更高。 “是的,我们要教育他们如何保持安全,不仅是为了他们个人,也是为了工作团队的安全、他们的家人、病患和疑似患者等的安全。” 网民提醒护士“并非轻松、安全职业” 不过,也有网民提醒,有关护士提出问题,并不是因为她抱怨薪资竟比测试员低,反之提出了长期来的体制问题。 再者,护士肯定不是“轻松、安全的工作”,他们可能工作内容都大同小异,而风险也并没有比较小。更应该探讨的是,如何针对医护人员面对的风险,给予合理报酬。

MHA: SPF and SCDF to progressively resume training for full-time national servicemen from 26 May

In light of the circuit breaker that began on 7 April, Basic…