by: Ravi Philemon/

Who shaped the 90s?  As I pondered hard on this question, I realised that I can give credit for this to only one man – Mr Goh Chok Tong.

Even before he took over as Prime Minister, Mr Lee Kuan Yew had already warned him “even from my sick bed, even if you are going to lower me into the grave and I feel something is going wrong, I will get up”.

Under the watchful eyes of Mr Lee Kuan Yew who continued to remain in Mr Goh’s cabinet as Senior Minister, Mr Goh (it seems now), had no choice but to go about stamping his own vision of Singapore in a subtle manner.

If the repression under Mr Lee Kuan Yew was obvious, the repression under Mr Goh was ‘soft’.  For example, when Catherine Lim suggested in her column in The Straits Times that the People’s Action Party (PAP) is out of touch with the people, she was suspended.

Mr Goh then publicly reprimanded her by saying, “If you land a blow on our jaw, you must expect a counterblow on your solar plexus”. To this, Mr Goh added that Ms Lim must enter the partisan political arena if she wants to continue airing her views. Ms Lim subsequently apologised.

It was under Mr Goh’s watch that Medisave contribution was made compulsory for self-employed people; the Group Representation Constituency (GRC) system was expanded when the country was under Mr Goh’s care; the vehicle quote system and the Elected Presidency were also enacted during his tenure in this decade.

It was Mr Goh’s belief that Singaporeans must increase their assets so that they would have a larger stake in the country.

Towards this, Mr Goh’s government implemented the Share Ownership Top-Up Scheme in 1993. The scheme gave $200 to every Singaporean aged 21 an above who had contributed $500 to his CPF account during a six-month period.  With the money, members could buy Singapore Telecom shares at a discount. About 1.4 million Singaporeans (many of whom had no clue what holding shares meant) became shareholders when Singapore Telecom was first floated.

To enhance the people’s assets, Mr Goh also advocated the upgrading of public housing flats. This upgrading was to enhance the value of the flat, which would result in a windfall when the owner of the flat sold it.  The upgrading was of course tied to you voting his Party in with a strong majority in the General Election. Constituencies which did not vote for his Party, he threatened would turn into slums.

It was also the Government under Mr Goh Chok Tong which relaxed the stricter yester-years immigration policy of Singapore.

Mr Goh justified the need to import foreign talent in his National Day Rally speech of 1998 citing the contributions of foreign talent to Microsoft, the French World Cup football team, and the Singapore team (that included Permanent Residents) which scaled Mount Everest.

He said then, “while we attract foreign talent and welcome foreigners who contribute to our economy, Singapore must always have a hard core of citizens, cohesive and totally committed to the country, around whom we can attract other talent and build a nation.”

Despite his subtleness, Mr Goh certainly did leave an indelible mark in the decade of the 90s. His subtle messages of enhancements and inclusivity which were lost to many in that time period, were however so profound that they continue to impact the lives of many Singaporeans even today.


This article is part of a series where contributors were asked for their personal take on who shaped the decades.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

马国警方煽动法逮捕批评者 元首后对拘捕行动失望

本月11日,马来西亚元首后东姑阿兹札突然关闭推特账号,结果引起网民议论,社交媒体甚至盛传元首后被“网络霸凌”,结果引来马国警方援引煽动法,逮捕“批评者”。 据了解,马国警方援引《1984年煽动法令》第4条文,并在13日晚上,逮捕社会主义党前青年团长卡立伊斯玛,后者被指曾批评元首后。 警方这一举动也引来马国社运组织痛批。元首后不得不在今早重启账号,澄清自己关闭账号,是基于个人因素,根本与那些批评留言无关。 东姑阿兹札在帖文中称,自己是得到女儿提醒,才获悉警方为了批评言论而逮捕两人,只好重启账号作出澄清。 “当我得知警方拘留有关批评者时,我感到伤心和愤怒。我重申,我停用账号不是因为他们(批评者)。” 她也指出,这些年来她和马国国家元首,也从未对那些批评人士采取过法律行动,因为马国是自由国度。 她续指已请王宫官员,转告警方不要采取行动。 至于卡立此前则否认,自己没有发表过任何有关元首后的推文;社会主义党副主席阿鲁,则批评警方晚上拉人的恐吓性举动,理应可避免,只要把当事人青岛警局协助调查即可,再者,他重申马国希盟政府应履行承诺,废除被视为违反人权的煽动法。  

被指在狮城办集会遭扣护照 香港“华记茶餐厅”业者已被遣返

香港“华记茶餐厅”业者杨官华,上个月因涉嫌在我国无准证聚会谈修例风波,护照遭扣押而无法离境。对此,警方已发出严厉的警告,并将他遣返回国,并表示杨官华在未经许可下,不得再次进入新加坡。 上月10日,他到新加坡开发生意商机时,却遭指在我国公开谈论他国政治。据悉,他曾在新加坡滨海湾一带的一家餐厅举行闲聊聚会,讨论目前香港政治的局势与意见。 集会共持续了约30分钟,大部分都是居住在我国的香港人,从集会视频而言,杨官华至少与10人聚会,并以粤语高呼“支持香港警察,保护香港,正义必胜”,因此被指在我国未经许可下公开谈论他国政治,而遭拘留并扣押护照。 除了杨官华 ,另一名前香港居民,如今入籍新加坡的房地产商人Phillip Chan,也出席该场聚会,同样地其护照也被扣押。据悉,两人是在集会上第一次碰面。 根据《公共秩序法案》,户外的公众游行与集会需要警察许可,否则即属违法。警方也提醒不会批准任何涉宣扬他国/区域政治目的的集会,呼吁游客应遵守我国法律。 昨日(20日)杨官华也上传视频证实自己已被释放,并已准备要离开狮城。他表示很高兴能够告诉自己重获自由,并感谢新加坡警方没有对他做出起诉,只是提醒他不能在新加坡触犯任何法律。 网民声援“华记”,要求释放杨官华 警方也发出声明证实确实有人呼吁新加坡释放杨官华,勿再对他采取进一步行动,但声明也表示,目前警方是按照程序与法律侦办。 警方最后再次强调,“新加坡一直都禁止外国人不应该通过公共集会宣传他国政治理念。” 两位遭扣押护照已于周三早晨归还护照,随后杨官华也离开新加坡回到香港。…

宣传小册仍把“讽刺”列为假消息 媒体通识理事会称将重新审视

日前,媒体通识理事会(MLC)因将讽刺(satire)也列为传播假消息的指标,闹得沸沸扬扬,随后澄清并道歉。但近日却被民众发现,该理事会的宣传小册子上,仍保留相同信息,再度引起关注。 周二,一名网民在社交网络网站Reddit分享有关册子,似乎是由媒体通识理事会所分发给学校的小册子《Get Smart With Sherlock》。内文说明分辨假消息的指标,其中仍包括具争议性的讽刺(satire)。 除了将讽刺列为假消息,小册子内也加以说明讽刺的定义,即使用幽默或夸张的行为来恶搞热门课题,有“愚弄不熟悉网络或事件的人之意”。 媒体通识理事会周五在回复《海峡时报》的询问时表示,目前已注意到小册子的内容,正在进行审查。 “我们最后一次派发小册子到学校是8月期间,此后我们已停止向学校分发。”媒体通识理事会。 然而,该名网友ongcs爆料,就读小学一年级的儿子是在媒体通识理事会澄清道歉,表明将讽刺设为假新闻指标是错误后,于本周二获得小册子,按理说此事已超过一周。 媒体通识理事会曾将假新闻指标定义为六种,包括虚假内容、冒名内容、含有操纵意味的内容、含有误导内容、标题党和讽刺(satire) 。其中最引人议论的就是“讽刺”的指标。 在事件引起各界讨论与关注后,媒体通识理事会于9月8日,针对误把“讽刺”列为假消息道歉,并表示会重新审视宣传内容。…

社论:闪耀人权光辉的中华传统思想

有读者向本社反映,人权是“舶来品”,是老外搞的一套,争取、崇尚人权形同崇洋媚外。这似乎是说,中华传统思想中,并没有“以人为本”的信念,此言差矣。 那么,在中华传统思想中,有“人权”的概念吗?找遍中华古代经典肯定是没有“人权”一词的,应是近代直接由“human right”翻译而来。虽然人权人权是西方文化的产物,但是我们老祖宗的智慧,却在千百年前就闪耀着人权的光辉。 在中国古代社会中,关于尊重人的基本生存权、平等和和谐共处的精神,在中华传统文化中非常丰富,信手捏来:己所不欲勿施于人,若别人不愿意,绝不强加事物在他人身上,其实就是敬重彼此权益的一种体现。以下我们再举些例子: 孟子:民为贵,社稷次之,君为轻 就是把百姓福祉放在首位,其次是社会发展,再来才是领袖。其实这都体现了儒家思想中,重视人民百姓、仁爱世人的主张,把人的权益放在首位。 其他类似倡议人民权益的说法,还有“民为邦本,本固邦存”,“君以民存,亦以民亡”、“天下为公”。“天下非一人之天下也,天下之天下也”等等。 所以如果古代天子施暴政失民心,人民处在水生火热中,很容易造成农民起义,推翻暴政,改朝换代。 有教无类 — 平等的受教育权利 不分贫富贵贱,都有受教育的权利,所以我们的先辈下南洋,仍然不忘教育,兴办学府让莘莘学子求取学问,成人成才为国做贡献。…