In an exclusive interview with The Online Citizen, four former Reform Party members – along with Ms Nor Lella Mardillahspeak about the reasons they joined the National Solidarity Party, their interest in politics, and the issues which should concern Singaporeans as the country prepares itself for the General Election.

Andrew Loh /

It has been quite a rollercoaster ride for some of the National Solidarity Party’s (NSP) new candidates for the General Election (GE), expected to be called in a matter of weeks.

Mr Tony Tan, Ms Hazel Poa, Mr Jeisilan Sivalingam and Ms Jeanette Chong-Aruldoss, together with five others, resigned en masse from the three-year old Reform Party in February this year. For a while, their political future seemed uncertain. In the weeks following the resignations, the group held talks with other opposition political parties, ostensibly about joining them.

Most notably, Mr Tan and Ms Poa met with veteran politician and Member of Parliament, Mr Chiam See Tong, in February/March. Mr Chiam is the secretary general of the Singapore People’s Party. The group also held talks with the NSP in the same period.

Eventually, however, the four of the nine RP breakaway faction decided to sign-up with the NSP and were promptly introduced on 11 March as the party’s candidates for the upcoming GE.

One of the reasons why they chose the NSP is because of the ‘complementary’ abilities which they are able to provide to the party, the group tells The Online Citizen (TOC).  An example is Mr Tan’s and Ms Poa’s experience in and exposure to public service. Mr Tan was formerly with the Singapore Armed Forces, and Ms Poa with the Administrative Service. The experience and the organizational abilities of the NSP’s veterans, together with the new members’ exposure in public service, would be mutually beneficial to the party especially in a General Election, the group says.

“This election very important for us,” Mr Tan explains. He feels that the experience will cement the bonding among the old and new party members.

Mr Tan, Ms Poa, Mr Jeisilan and Ms Nor Lella were introduced at the media conference in March as the NSP’s candidates for Moulmein-Kallang GRC. However, the party is still in discussion with the Workers’ Party which is also interested in contesting the constituency.

Ms Chong, meanwhile, has set her sights on Mountbatten SMC, where she grew up in, and has begun her outreach activities there.

So, what is it that makes seemingly ordinary folks like them interested in politics, and opposition politics at that?

Mr Jeisilan says he was “disillusioned” with the way things were and the direction that the country was heading. It came to a point where he said he had to get involved. He joined the Reform Party and became its Organising Secretary.

“The primary purpose was to stand [for elections],” he says. As a teenager he would attend events and rallies where the late Mr JB Jeyaretnam would speak at. These inspired him. “I saw the passion and conviction he had in fighting for ordinary Singaporeans,” Mr Jeisilan explains. “That had an effect on me.”

Mr Jeyaretnam founded the Reform Party in 2008.

For lawyer Ms Chong, it was her personal experience which spurred her to dip her feet in politics. When her block was designated for the en bloc programme, she realized that she could do little when the majority of those in her block of flats consented to the programme. She could not fathom how a law could allow one’s home to be involuntarily sold.

“I began to read the parliamentary debates,” Ms Chong says, “to see how that law was promulgated.” While the debate was “lively”, she says, in the end the PAP Government, because of its overwhelmingly majority in the House, passed the law.

“I do not understand how we can have any parliamentary debates over new laws if 82 out of 84 parliamentarians are from one party,” she says. Ms Chong also observed that her own children were becoming disaffected and were lacking a sense of belonging to the country. “That really woke me up,” she says, “that I may lose my children. I [would] be as good as childless because my children would be wanting to go overseas.”

It has since been a journey of several years for her to find out why young Singaporeans such as her children do not feel any affinity to Singapore. Her decision to enter the political arena is, among others, to help facilitate a two-party system in Singapore and to foster a more engaged citizenry.

When Lee Hsien Loong took office as Prime Minister in 2004, Mr Tan believed that PM Lee would take the country “to the next level”. However, soon after, Mr Tan began to realize that things were not quite right. The Government’s decision to peg civil servants’ salaries to the private sector and bonuses to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) was a turning point for Mr Tan.

“I personally had a lot of concerns about this,” he says. As someone who had started and managed businesses of his own, he could not imagine that there was only one Key Performance Indicator (KPI) – the GDP – as the determinant in paying such high salaries and bonuses to ministers. “If your system is one that is opaque, and [you] only say trust us, we know what is best for you…  I am very uncomfortable with that,” Mr Tan explains.

“I first started having misgivings about the PAP Government when they linked HDB upgrading to party politics,” says Ms Poa. “To me that was the first overt sign that party interest supercedes citizens’ interest.” She became more concerned when other policies were implemented, such as high ministerial salaries and the decision to allow casinos in Singapore. The Government was also not listening to public sentiment, says Ms Poa.

“PAP has been in power for so long, successful for so long they have enormous faith in some of their longstanding positions,” Ms Poa says.  “It has come to a point where it’s difficult for any person to change them. I don’t believe the change can come from inside.”

Change can only come from politicians, she feels.  “For civil service, it is very difficult to change anything because they are there to execute [policies].”

Ms Poa says that while there are certain people within the PAP who may be trying to change things from within the party, she does not see them succeeding either. “I feel that external pressure is necessary,” she explains.

For Ms Nor Lella, it was her experience in community, charity and counseling work which made her realize that the system was not helping those at the bottom level of society and those who have fallen through the cracks.

“The things I have witnessed with my own eyes, my ground work with Red Staff Community. . it’s very sad,” she says.  Eventually, through a friend she got in touch with Mr Goh Meng Seng, the Secretary General of the NSP.

“He asked me what I wanted to do in my life,” Ms Nor Lella says, “and I said well, if I could change something for these people, that’s what I want to do. He asked me to consider NSP as my next platform. I didn’t say no.”

Their individual decisions to step into politics had not been easy, the group says. There were “a lot of push and pull over a duration of a few years”, Mr Tan explains. “For many of us, mother of four, father of two, I must say that all of us make a lot of sacrifices. Time we want to spend with our kids, time to grow our business, gazing at the beach, which is something I miss.”

They are also aware of the state of the opposition in Singapore.

“We know the state of opposition vis-à-vis PAP,” Mr Tan says.  “Like machinery versus spears.” But he is not discouraged. In particular, he hopes to get younger Singaporeans to be interested. “This is my message to young people: in 10-15 years this country will be yours, not ours. So what is in it for you? They should know that if they are not happy with the policies, they must speak out.”

In Part 2 of this article, the group speaks about the issues which they feel are important, especially in the General Election.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

居民因少时吸强力胶申请工作被拒 林志蔚冀探讨撤非暴力前科者记录

本月2日,盛港集选区议员林志蔚,提呈国会提问,询问政府是否有意扩大黄丝带计划范围?包括让那些非暴力犯罪的前罪犯,在很长一段时间行为良好的前提下,在成功重返社会后有资格撤销他们的犯罪记录。藉此,无需在求职时申报这些记录。 然而,律政暨内政部长尚穆根,在脸书分享针对林志蔚的书面答复,提及删除非暴力前囚犯记录的风险,形容性诱拐(sexual grooming)、非礼、刑事失信、入室行窃等,都属非暴力罪行。 尚穆根更举例,有29岁英国籍阅读班教师在上课时非礼3岁女学生,“若采纳议员的建议,是否意味着此人还能在雇主不知情情况下,继续与孩童共处,新加坡家长会感到舒服吗?” 又或者,在雇主不知情下,将入屋行窃前科者聘雇为公寓保安,尚穆根认为此举并不明智。 他也强调,在安全和透明方式下,政府改造和协助前犯罪者就业,而现有框架也在不断完善。 黄丝带新加坡(YRSG),旨在协助前囚犯重犯社会,包括加深技能、培训和提供就业机会等。 [The risks in MP Jamus…

政坛军中强大影响力 泰前首相布勒姆逝世

前泰国首相、已故泰王蒲眉蓬(Bhumibol Adulyadej)最信任的顾问布勒姆(Prem Tinsulanonda)因于5月26日上午因心脏衰歇,在曼谷医院,以98岁高龄离世。 本月初,布勒姆仍和军政府首领巴育,出席泰王哇集拉隆功迎娶素提达为第四任妻子并册封皇后的仪式,还主持了有关的婚礼圣水仪式。 当时布勒姆的身体已开始出状况,行动需要助手搀扶,才能站着完成主持仪式。 自1920年,在泰南府宋卡出生的布勒姆,在1941年宗军校毕业后,于冷战期间在军中军衔步步高升,于1978年升任陆军总司令,并于两年后获得已故泰王的允许,于无声政变中出任首相一职。 1980至1988年,布勒姆就任首相期间,可说是泰国在多次政变动荡中少有的政、经两方皆稳定的时期。 他卸任后进入枢密院,随后更成为枢密院主席。当时的他已经在军中和政坛上,有着无可比拟的强大影响力。 他在担任枢密院主席期间,曾经在已故泰王于2016年10月去世后,短暂担任了该国的摄政王。 被盟友视为稳定泰国证据的强大力量,却是批评对象所憎恨的保皇派,布勒姆帮助已故泰王巩固了君主制和军队之间不可动摇的联系。 多次参与军事政变 布勒姆曾参与多次军事政变事件,而在12次成功军事政变中,他就参与了五次的幕后策划或有份参与其中,包括了他在2006年对推翻首相他信政府起了关键作用,以及2014年的推翻英叻政府的军事变故。…

“阿谀奉承未深究问题” 前海时记者抨击主流媒体短板

因前雇主樟宜机场集团主席廖文良的指控,印尼籍前女佣巴蒂·莉雅妮(Parti Liyani)遭卷入长达四年的官司。直至本月4日,才获高庭平反,推翻判决改判无罪。 前海峡时报资深记者Goh Eng Yeow感叹,主流媒体并未针对此事“深入探究问题”,反而是选择“阿谀奉承”。 2016年,46岁的印尼籍前女佣巴蒂被开除,廖家父子在两日后又报警,指控巴蒂偷走5万元财物,包括价值2.5万元名表、Prada的名牌包和Gucci墨镜等。2019年3月20日芭蒂被判罪名成立, 然而,今年9月,法官陈成安推翻了上述判决,指廖家父子报警,可能存在“不当意图”(improper motives),被告有充分理由投诉人力部,而廖家“先下手为强”将他开除。 质问主流媒体没有深入探究问题 对此,Goh在脸书上发文,指主流媒体只会一味的刻画廖文良美好的一面,并晒出一张《海峡时报》的文章,内容为廖文良谈及自己一直都聘雇比自己更优秀的人。该篇报道于去年出版。 “所以我从我的前主管Alan John(已退休)那里看到这长篇大论的文章,想问为何没有再去质问,曾在去年以梦想和卑微背景打动我们的廖文良,问问他为什么?”…

自新西兰澳洲部分城市起飞 即起可在樟宜机场过境

新加坡航空宣布,即日起乘搭该公司、胜安航空及酷航,从澳大利亚和新西兰部分城市起飞的班机,将可以通过樟宜机场过境。 新航今日(6月11日)在脸书帖文,分享这份好消息,但是过境航班只限于出境行程,从其他地点飞往上述两国的航班则不能在我国过境。 文中所指的城市,包括了澳洲的阿德雷德、布里斯班、墨尔本、珀斯和悉尼,还有新西兰的基督城和奥克兰。 除此之外,新航还提供了三家公司的航班时间表,并表示过境乘客在抵达樟宜机场后,将会和非过境乘客分开,被安置在制定的区域等候。而过境乘客也有可能被直接带到登机口,若他们的过境时间是在75分钟以内。 惟,在登机程序上,过境乘客会先登机,之后才到非过境乘客。着陆下机时则相反,会让非过境乘客先下机。 在飞机上,新航也会将过境乘客和非过境乘客分开区域安置,并且要求乘客在行程中,只能在各自的指定区域内行动。