Between Nov 15, and Nov 16, Today and Channel Newsasia -both owned by Mediacorp –  posted the same article by Sara Grosse online, under slightly different headlines. (‘ComCare applications decrease this year‘ – CNA Nov 15  and ‘Fewer need assistance from Comcare as economy improves‘ – Today Nov 16)

Nothing out of the ordinary, it would seem, as we all know that it is editors, not writers who decide on the headlines, and we can assume that both websites would have different editors.

Channel Newsasia, Nov 15
Today Online, Nov 16

However, upon closer look, one notices that there is more than just the headlines of the articles which are different. In the Channel Newsasia version, it is written that the ‘maximum duration of assistance given” under the Comcare fund is “three months”.

Channel Newsasia's version

Interestingly, in the Today online version of the same article, posted on Nov 16, the highlighted sentence is missing!

Today Online's version

Considering that Channel Newsasia Online actually has a higher readership than Today Online, it does appear strange that the editor for the Today Online version deemed it necessary to tweak the sentence.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Never book another flight on Tiger Air!

Save yourself the hassle, skip Tiger Air, choose a better airline, and…

Swedish MP Roughed up by Mugabe’s bodyguard In Singapore

A Swedish MP states that a bodyguard of Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe roughed…

TOC takes to the streets on Saturday

TOC media team goes out to talk to S’poreans about 2008 & 2009.

The Li Hong Yi saga: the blogosphere steps up to bat

By Choo Zheng Xi Reuters, when reporting on the Li Hong Yi…