Connect with us

Uncategorized

Should Singaporean youths be allowed to vote at 18?

Published

on

The Youth Wing of The Workers’ Party will be holding a public discussion forum on the issue of lowering the voting age to 18 this Saturday, May 3. (See details below.)

Titled, “YouthQuake – Should Singaporean Youths Be Allowed To Vote At 18?”, it “seeks to educate, empower, and unite young people to bring youth-centric issues into the forefront of public discourse.”

TOC speaks to its Organising Secretary, Mr Bernard Chen, about the forum.

——————

TOC: Why this issue? Why now? What is the purpose?

Bernard Chen: Singapore is very far behind in the public discourse on this issue. While other countries are talking about lowering the voting age to 16, we have not even started talking about voting at 18.

There’s no specific reason why I am bringing this issue up at this moment in time. I feel that it is important that youths are given the right to vote and YouthQuake provides this platform for me to bring out this issue to the forefront of public discourse.

My purpose is to bring this issue to the attention of youths in Singapore that being able to vote @ 18 is feasible and can be achieved if youths in Singapore want that to happen.

TOC: The name of your forum, “YouthQuake”, suggests that you want to cause a major awakening of sorts among Singaporean youths on the issue of voting at 18. Is that your intention?

Bernard Chen: YouthQuake symbolises the stirring/ awakening of youths in Singapore and encapsulate the concept of change with youths at the forefront of the movement. Youths in Singapore want to speak and can speak well. Let’s get moving!

TOC: Singaporean youths are said to be politically apathetic. Do you think they are interested in being able to vote at 18?

Bernard Chen: Has anyone ever wondered why are they apathetic in the first place? After 18 years of their life, and being told that their opinions only matter when they reached 21 and they should only be seen and not heard, is anyone surprised that many people over 18 feel turned off by politics?

Granting youths the right to vote at 18 will have a direct effect on their character, intelligence and sense of responsibility, taking the public-spirited nature of youths in Singapore into the political realm. Apathy will soon be a thing of the past.

TOC: Do you think Singaporean youths at 18 are mature enough to vote “wisely”, as the PAP like to say?

Bernard Chen: Is it at all possible that any Singaporean will vote “unwisely” or vote wrong? Did voters in Hougang made an “unwise” decision when they elected Low Thia Khiang to parliament in 1991, and again in 1997, 2001 and 2006?

If a youth is mature enough at 18 to make quick and wise decisions that will have repercussions on the lives of their fellow brothers-in-arms in the military, I do not see why they are in any way less mature when called upon to vote.

All voters have their own reasons when they vote for any party. We may disagree with their reasons, but we must respect their right to make a decision. That is what we must do with youths.

TOC: What is the most significant difference between being able to vote at 18 and voting at 21. It is, after all, only a 3 year difference.

Bernard Chen: I am questioning the double standards the government is applying towards our youths. It’s not a matter of the difference in the number of years. It’s the principle behind it.

Young Singaporeans can start pursing a life of choice and freedom at the age of 18. For instance, they have the freedom to smoke, to drive (all classes of vehicles), to join a political party, to sign legally binding contracts (scholarships especially), to work and pay taxes. In addition to that, Singaporeans at the age of 18 can be charged as a non-minor for certain legal offences. In this case, why is it that young Singaporeans upon the age of 18 cannot have the choice to choose who their representatives in parliament will be.

TOC: Is there consensus within the WP Youth Wing on this issue? What is it?

Bernard Chen: Internal discussion on this issue has yielded general consensus on calling for a lowering of voting age to 18

TOC: Is the Workers’ Party going to lobby for a change in the voting age?

Bernard Chen: At this moment, I am not in a position to make a comment on behalf of the leadership of the Workers’ Party.

TOC: What do you think will be the government’s response to your call to lower the voting age?

Bernard Chen: I expect their stand to be the same as the one they took in March 2007 during the Committee of Supply debate in Parliament. I quote, “On voting age, we do not intend to change that. Sir, voting in parliamentary elections or voting in election for the Presidency is a very serious matter.” – DPM Jayakumar.

I hope that with this forum, more attention can be paid to this issue.

For more information, refer to the “Speech by DPM Prof S Jayakumar during Committee of Supply Debate, 2 Mar 2007.

TOC: What has the Workers’ Party Youth Wing done since the elections in 2006 to build or instill greater awareness among Singaporean youths for political issues?

Bernard Chen: The Workers’ Party Youth Wing involved itself in selling the party newsletter, “Hammer” at locations such as Bugis, Holland Village, Ang Mo Kio Hub, areas where there is a large density of youths, reaching out to them. On top of that, we did public outreach activities along Orchard Road during Youth Day and National Day. The Youth Wing will be organising more activities that are political in nature in the coming months, with YouthQuake being the focus of this effort.

TOC: What has been your experience in organizing this forum? What’re the main difficulties?

Bernard Chen: It has been a rewarding experience in organizing this forum. The main difficulty I faced was in trying to come up with a concept that will resonate with youths in Singapore. I am hopefully that the name, “YouthQuake” will eventually be synonymous with the WPYW.

TOC: How hopeful are you about the attendance or success of this forum?

Bernard Chen: I am hopeful that there will be a full house this Saturday; 60 – 70 individuals.

TOC: What is next after this forum, as far as changing the voting age is concerned?

Bernard Chen: The Youth Wing will continue to engage young Singaporeans on this issue and we look forward to hearing more from young Singaporeans on this proposal to lower the voting age to 18.

This discussion is available on the Facebook account of the Workers’ Party (Click here). The public can also email the youth wing at [email protected] .

———————-

The details of the YouthQuake Forum are as follows:

Date: 3rd May 2008 (Saturday)

Time: 1400 hrs – 1600 hrs. Please be seated by 1345 hrs

Venue: 216-G Syed Alwi Road #0203

Read more about the forum here.

———————–

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Indonesia

Miss Universe cuts ties with Indonesia chapter after harassment allegations

The Miss Universe Organization severs ties with Indonesia franchise due to harassment claims. Malaysia edition canceled.

Women allege body checks before pageant. Investigation launched. Safety prioritized.

Indonesia winner to compete in November finale. Height requirement controversy.

Published

on

WASHINGTON, UNITED STATES — The Miss Universe Organization has cut ties with its Indonesia franchise, it announced days after allegations of sexual harassment, and will cancel an upcoming Malaysia edition.

In the complaint, more than a half dozen women said all 30 finalists for Miss Universe Indonesia were unexpectedly asked to strip for a supposed body check for scars and cellulite two days before the pageant’s crowning ceremony in Jakarta.

Their lawyer said Tuesday that five of the women had their pictures taken.

“In light of what we have learned took place at Miss Universe Indonesia, it has become clear that this franchise has not lived up to our brand standards, ethics, or expectations,” the US-based Miss Universe Organization posted Saturday night on social media site X, formerly known as Twitter.

It said that it had “decided to terminate the relationship with its current franchise in Indonesia, PT Capella Swastika Karya, and its National Director, Poppy Capella.”

It thanked the contestants for their bravery in coming forward and added that “providing a safe place for women” was the organization’s priority.

Jakarta police spokesman Trunoyudo Wisnu Andiko said Tuesday that an investigation into the women’s complaint has been launched.

The Indonesia franchise also holds the license for Miss Universe Malaysia, where there will no longer be a competition this year, according to the New York-based parent organizer.

In a lengthy statement posted to Instagram, Indonesia franchise director Capella denied involvement in any body checks.

“I, as the National Director and as the owner of the Miss Universe Indonesia license, was not involved at all and have never known, ordered, requested or allowed anyone who played a role and participated in the process of organizing Miss Universe Indonesia 2023 to commit violence or sexual harassment through body checking,” she wrote.

She added that she is against “any form of violence or sexual harassment.”

The Jakarta competition was held from 29 July to 3 August to choose Indonesia’s representative to the 2023 Miss Universe contest, and was won by Fabienne Nicole Groeneveld.

Miss Universe said it would make arrangements for her to compete in the finale, scheduled for November in El Salvador.

This year’s Indonesia pageant also came under fire for announcing a “significant change in this (year’s) competition guidelines” with the elimination of its minimum height requirement after it had crowned a winner.

In its statement, the Miss Universe Organization said it wanted to “make it extremely clear that there are no measurements such as height, weight, or body dimensions required to join a Miss Universe pageant worldwide.”

— AFP

Continue Reading

Malaysia

A Perodua service centre in Kuantan, Malaysia went viral for its strict dress code, Perodua responds

A dress code for vehicle servicing? A Malaysian car brand’s service centre dress code signage has puzzled netizens, raising queries about the need for attire rules during a routine service.

The manufacturer responded with an official statement after a flurry of comments, seeking to clarify and apologize.

Published

on

By

MALAYSIA: A dress code signage positioned at a service centre belonging to a prominent Malaysian car brand has sparked bewilderment among Malaysian netizens, who question the necessity of adhering to attire guidelines for a simple vehicle servicing.

The signage explicitly delineates clothing items that are deemed unsuitable, including sleeveless tops, short skirts, abbreviated pants, and distressed jeans.

The car manufacturer swiftly found itself flooded with comments from both inquisitive and irked Malaysian netizens. This surge in online activity prompted the company to issue an official statement aimed at clarifying the situation and extending an apology.

In a post that gained significant traction on the social media platform, politician Quek Tai Seong of Pahang State, Malaysia, shared an image to Facebook on Monday (7 Aug).

The image showcased a dress code sign prominently displayed at a Perodua Service Centre in Kuantan. Within the post, Quek posed the question: “Is this dress code applicable nationwide, or is it specific to this branch?”

The signage reads, “All customers dealing with Perodua Service Kuantan 1, Semambu, are requested to dress modestly and appropriately.”

Adding visual clarity to these guidelines, the sign features illustrative graphics that explicitly outline clothing items deemed unacceptable, including sleeveless tops, short skirts, short pants, and ripped jeans.

Delineating the specifics of the dress code, the signage stipulates that male visitors are expected to don shirts accompanied by neckties, opt for long pants, and wear closed shoes.

Conversely, female visitors are advised to don long-sleeved shirts, full-length skirts, and closed-toe footwear.

Perodua’s dress code sparks online uproar

Following the rapid spread of the post, Perodua’s official Facebook page found itself inundated with comments from both intrigued and frustrated Malaysian netizens, all seeking clarifications about the newly surfaced dress code policy.

Amidst the flurry of comments, numerous incensed netizens posed pointed questions such as, “What is the rationale behind the introduction of such regulations by the management? We demand an explanation.”

Another netizen expressed their dissatisfaction, arguing against the necessity of the rule and urging Perodua to take inspiration from the practices of other 4S (Sales, Service, Spare Parts, and Survey) automotive dealerships.

A concerned Facebook user chimed in, advocating for a more lenient stance, asserting that attempting to dictate customers’ clothing choices might not be in the company’s best interest.

Someone also commented in an angry tone, “Oi what is this? Going there for car service, not interview or working, right.”

As the discourse unfolded, it became evident that while some inquiries carried genuine weight, others chose to inject humor into the situation, playfully remarking, “If I wanted to buy a Myvi, I should buy or rent a formal attire first.”

“I sell economy rice at a hawker centre, I have never worn a long sleeve shirt and a tie… I guess I will not buy a Perodua car then.”

“I guess they will not serve those who wear short pants.”

Perodua addresses dress code controversy

As reported by Chinese media outlet Sin Chew Daily News, the manager of Kuantan’s Perodua Service Centre had acknowledged that the images on the dress code signage were misleading.

In response, the manager divulged that discussions had transpired with the head office, leading to the prompt removal of the signage to prevent any further misconceptions.

The manager clarifies, “We do encourage visitors to adhere to the dress etiquette, but we won’t go to the extent of restricting their choice of attire.”

He also revealed that currently, no complaints have been directly received from the public.

However, feedback from certain customers was relayed through Perodua’s agents.

Perodua also released an official statement by chief operating officer JK Rozman Jaffar on Wednesday (9 Aug) regarding the dress code on their official Facebook page.

The statement stated the dress code etiquette is not aligned with their official guidelines and they are currently conducting an official investigation on the matter followed by corrective measures to avoid the same incident from happening.

Perodua also extends its apologies for any inconvenience caused.

 

Continue Reading

Trending