Roy Ngerng and Davinder Singh
Roy Ngerng in his interview with Joel Lazarus (image - YouTube)
Roy Ngerng in his interview with Joel Lazarus (image – YouTube)

• High Court Judge Justice Lee Seiu Kin started the second day of the hearing for damages to be awarded to Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong by telling the accused, blogger Roy Ngerng, about what he can do in the witness box where he was to be cross-examined by PM Lee’s lawyer, Davinder Singh. Justice Lee allowed Ngerng to object to questions by Singh, as he has no legal counsel. Nevertheless, Ngerng did not exercise that option throughout the cross-examination.

• Ngerng also provided additional evidence – two bundles of documents of 35 and 47 pages – to show that PM Lee’s reputation has not been affected by the his blog post. He noted that respondents on PM Lee’s Facebook page on two recent occasions – when he celebrated his 10 years a Prime Minister and when he posted about corruption in government – praised him for his honour and dignity. Ngerng thus contended that PM Lee’s reputation was not affected, and hence there was no need for him to seek aggravated damages.

• Davinder Singh, PM Lee’s lawyer, started the cross examination by referring Ngerng to his past occupation and experience in promoting healthcare, affirming that he would be someone who would “carefully consider what [he] say and how [he] said it” and that he would “make whatever point to get the message home”. This was to follow later into Singh’s suggestion that Ngerng had been deliberate in crafting his blog posts and using the Letter of Demand to further defame PM Lee.

• Singh mentioned The Online Citizen twice during the cross examination – the first when asking Ngerng if he was aware that TOC carried reports of his defamation case; and the second when asking Ngerng if he was aware that Mr Leong Sze Hian, one of the people whom Ngerng had granted access to a video he produced that was deemed defamatory, contributed content to TOC. It was not clear where Singh was heading with these questions.

• Singh asked Ngerng if he was aware of that criminal charges were laid on the people involved in the City Harvest Church case, and if he knew that there was a lot of public interest in the case, when he had drawn references between City Harvest Church and the Central Provident Fund. “I’m aware that people are interested in Serina Wee and maybe Sun Ho. I’m not sure if they are interested in the case,” Ngerng replied.

• Singh repeatedly attempted to draw links in Ngerng’s blog post that suggested parallels between City Harvest Church and CPF management. Ngerng insisted that the charts he used did not mention misappropriation of CPF monies in relation to LHL, but only in reference to the government. This went on for a while with Singh trying to pick apart the statements Ngerng made in court, until Ngerng eventually retorted in frustration, “Which part of my statement said ‘Lee Hsien Loong’?”

Roy Ngerng protest TOCTV• “Aiyoh, what kind of logic is that!” – Ngerng had openly exclaimed when Singh repeatedly cited paragraphs in his Evidence in Chief to try and draw links between how Ngerng referred to the CPF and PM Lee.

• Ngerng continued to challenge Singh to show proof of the link, to which Singh has yet to do so directly. “Mr Singh, You are a Senior Counsel, do not drag the argument!” he said at one point.

• At another point during the heated exchange, Justice Lee reminded Ngerng that he can choose to answer or not answer Singh’s questions, but he should avoid “berating the Senior Counsel”.

• Singh sought to convince the court that in publishing Letter of Demand, RN was deliberately trying to increase traffic to and publicity for his site. Ngerng, however, insisted that he was scared, sad and angry that the government had wanted to sue him for raising the CPF issue. “My initial reaction was – oh my god, Davinder Singh, the PM’s lawyer, sent me a letter!”

• Singh tried to suggest that, because Ngerng still had the Letter of Demand on his blog, he was continuing the aggravation. “Did you ask me to take down the Letter of Demand?” Ngerng retorted, saying that he would have removed it if Singh had asked him to. “Come on, Mr Singh… I have been very supportive of you the past few days, you know that.”

• Singh asked Ngerng why he continued to write about the CPF. “Are you suggesting that the purpose of the Letter [of Demand] was to cow me into submission?” Ngerng responded. “I will still stand up (and fight), because [CPF and the defamation suit] were separate issues.”

• At another point, when Singh cross examined him about a video he posted that suggested Ngerng was referring to CPF management and PM Lee as one and the same, Ngerng told Singh to look at the video in its entirely instead, retorting, “You do not get to cherry-pick what you want to read in my video, what you want to link it to.”

• DS pointed out that following Ngerng’s promise that he would not repeat the allegations, he sent an email to “a host of journalists”, publishing the link to the Letter of Demand. “You drew attention to the letter, knowing that the letter had [a link to] the offending article in there.” Ngerng, however, said that he also included a link to his apology in the email.

Also read TOC’s report on the second day of the hearing.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

印尼新内阁名单出炉 委任对手普拉博沃为国防部长

印尼总统佐科(Joko Widodo),今日公布其第二任期新内阁阵容。其中他委任前反对党领袖、此前成为他总统选举竞争对手的普拉博沃,成为国防部长,备受瞩目。 佐科威当天在宣布普拉博沃的新任务时说:“我认为我不需要向他讲解他的工作。他比我懂得更多。” 不过,普拉博沃被指在任职军官期间曾侵犯人权,而今却获延揽出任防长一职,相信将再引发争议。 普拉博沃(Prabowo Subianto),有显赫政治和家庭背景,也是前印尼独裁者苏哈托的女婿,在后者统治期间担任特种部队司令。 他被指控涉及多项侵犯人权行为,包括1998年数名亲民主活跃分子遭绑架及失踪事件。当时的事件导致大规模街头示威,最后推翻苏哈多政权。普拉博沃领导的陆军战略部队及其嫡系特种部队,也被指参与和策划1998年印尼排华暴动。不过,普拉博沃不曾因有关指控受到提控。 今年5月,印尼选举委员会公布选举结果,不过普拉博沃拒绝接受结果,其支持者也发起大规模抗议,超过万人参与。然而有人士蓄意挑衅和犯罪行为,雅加达一度陷入骚乱,惟普拉博沃与暴民保持距离。 至于佐科内阁的其他38位部长中,曾经出任世界银行董事经理的丝丽.穆耳雅妮继续出任财政部长,而外交部长蕾特诺也留任。 早前盛传将入阁的印尼电召魔多车GOJEK创办人纳迪姆,也证实出任教育及文化部长。他此前已宣布辞去市值100亿美元公司的总裁职务。 纳迪姆毕业于美国布朗大学和哈佛商学院,相信佐科有意倚重他推动印尼经济和技术的发展。

APF a chance for civil society to engage region’s governments

More than 1,400 participants from civil society and high-level government officials to engage actively…

The never ending story of low productivity?

By Leong Sze Hian – I refer to the article "Productivity rates…

Disney to close down 13 pay -TV channels in Singapore starting 1 October

From 1 October this year, 13 of Disney’s pay-television channels in Singapore…