~ By C C Y ~

Central to the discussion surrounding the maintenance of Bukit Brown in its unspoilt state is the question of how to best use space in Singapore, particularly one that is not high-rise steel and concrete. Skeptics of maintaining Bukit Brown in its natural condition argue that the land can be put to better use. Such positions clearly underplay the fact that a green Bukit Brown benefits Singapore by retaining rainwater, lowering ambient temperature, and preserving biodiversity. Bukit Brown does so much better than the twenty-two golf courses that take up 2.2 percent of our land and 88 percent of all recreational space in Singapore ever can.[1]

But leaving aside environmental issues for a moment, I believe that conserving Bukit Brown can serve to celebrate and promote Singapore to both Singaporeans and visitors alike. A Bukit Brown in its natural glory can connect Singaporeans to the spirit that shaped who we are as a nation and introduce visitors to a Singapore that is much more than simply steel-reinforced concrete, asphalt, and glass. Of course, many may wonder who in their right mind would visit a cemetery. Here, I would like to suggest that having a cemetery as a major site of historical — and potentially tourist — interest is very common internationally, even in cities that otherwise clamour for space.

Strong precedent to preserve cemeteries

Just north of the causeway, Malacca is proud of its Bukit Cina and Penang, its Jewish and Protestant cemeteries, just as Tokyo openly extols its Aoyama and Yanaka cemeteries. Few would think to destroy the catacombs in Rome or Paris, just as most would not consider constructing roads through and buildings over Pere-Lachaise, Montparnasse, Montmatre, Brompton, Highgate, or Kensal Green. Los Angeles has Hollywood Forever Cemetery, New Orleans has Lafayette and St. Louis, while New York City keeps Marble Cemetery, Trinity Church Cemetery, and the African Burial Ground National Monument on Manhattan. Even land-starved Hong Kong Island has its Happy Valley Cemetery and Stanley Military Cemetery. The list can go on and on.

Pere-Lachaise Cemetery in Paris
 

Lafayette Cemetery in New Orleans

These spaces help define the urban and social landscape in which they belong, and help shape the character of their cities. Locals go to these cemeteries for walks and to physically connect with the past, children visit these places as part of school tours to learn about where their cities and even countries came from. Visitors from out of town make special effort to see these cemeteries because they are an indelible part of the experience of visiting these cities. From “Interview with a Vampire” to “Easy Rider” and “The Da Vinci Code”, many of these cemeteries have been immortalised on the silver screen. Aoyama Cemetery is even a traditional location for Japanese families to picnic and view the cherry blossoms each spring.

Aoyama Cemetery in Tokyo
 

Inside of Pere-Lachaise Cemetery, Paris
 

Land price argument is flawed

If prices are an indicator of the relative scarcity of land, then many of the cities mentioned earlier have as much a concern for the availability of space as Singapore, if not more. According to the credit-/debt analysis firm Credit Sesame, land in Singapore cost an average of US$1,561 per square foot as of 2011.[2] This is less than the US$3,287 per square foot in Paris and the US$1,590 per square foot in London, but more than the US$1,090 in New York City for the same year. The same study lists a square foot in the middle income Taikoo Shing area in Hong Kong as going for US$1,118. In comparison, average land prices in Tokyo stood at US$2,080 per square foot in 2008, the year of the Global Financial Crisis.[3] In none of these other urban areas were there calls to pave over their historic cemeteries.

Offering a cheaper attraction

That Singapore is able to spend substantial funds on creating spaces for recreation strongly suggests that we can well afford Bukit Brown. Gardens-by-the-Bay cost S$800 million to construct, while Marina Bay Sands took S$8 billion to erect and Resorts World Singapore, S$6.59 billion.[4] The collection from the Belitung Shipwreck came at a price of US$32 million.[5] The purchase and exhibition of a dinosaur family from the United States by the Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research has a tag of at least S$46 million.[6] Bukit Brown may prove no less an attraction for visitors than these other locations. It can even offer a more accommodating and affordable to place visit as an open, public space.

Has a unique selling point

Among Bukit Brown’s draws is the fact that it is one of the largest Chinese burial grounds in the world outside China. It is unique in featuring Overseas Chinese, including members of Sun Yat-sen’s Tongmenghui and prominent individuals in the modern history of Southeast Asia. The intricate tomb designs found at Bukit Brown are particular to this part of the world. Bukit Brown also includes the communal graves of many who perished during the Second World War and the Japanese Occupation, possibly including some killed during the Japanese Imperial Army’s brutal Operation Sook Ching. Compared against Singapore’s other expenditures on new recreational facilities, protecting Bukit Brown costs almost nothing. Its cultural and historical significance as well as natural beauty provides an extra texture to Singapore that buildings and artificial landscapes just cannot.

Saving Bukit Brown simply makes sense. Beyond its importance to the natural environment and biodiversity in Singapore, Bukit Brown may be a key to sustainable development on our increasingly urbanised nation. This comes together with its significance to Singapore history and heritage, which can help bind future generations to our shared past and root them in Singapore, supplementing longstanding efforts at national education and nation-building. Doing so with generic modern buildings and artificial landscaping tends to be much more difficult. In addition, a natural and protected Bukit Brown can prove inviting to visitors, giving them an experience that is different from what is available elsewhere on the island — it is truly and uniquely Singapore.

Conserving Bukit Brown is neither difficult nor expensive to accomplish. Do the right thing. Push to protect Bukit Brown.

__________________

[1]
Concept Plan Review, Focus Group Consultation, Final Report on Land Allocation – submitted to the Ministry of National Development on 22 December 2000

 

 

[2]
Colin Dobrin, “America’s Top Cities: Cheapest Real Estate in the World?” – 26 September 2011

 

 

[4]
Shibani Mahtani, “State-of-the-Art Gardening, Singapore-Style”, The Wall Street Journal, 10 March 2012
Las Vegas Sands says Singapore casino opening delayed”, AsiaOne Travel, 08 July 2009
Genting says integrated resorts bill could rise to S$6.59b”, Channel News Asia, 19 February 2009

 

 

[6]
Generous mystery donor makes $8 million dino deal possible”, AsiaOne, 07 September 2011

 

 


To find out more, you can visit SOS Bukit Brown (and its facebook page) and Bukit Brown Cemetery (and its facebook page). Information on weekend tours of Bukit Brown conducted by volunteers are available from All Things Bukit Brown (and its facebook page).

You can also join the petition to save Bukit Brown at the SOS Bukit Brown website and individually write to your MP asking to save Bukit Brown, or demand for the public release of details surrounding the LTA's road-building plans, hydrology studies, biodiversity impact assessment, and other related evaluations, none of which have been made fully available to the public.

_______________________________

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

李玮玲:媒体一再重复总理对显扬”不实且可耻指控“

已故建国总理李光耀的女儿李玮玲,今早(4月15日)在个人脸书发文抨击,近期媒体报导不断重复哥哥李显龙总理,对李显扬的“不实且可耻的指控”(false and dishonourable allegations),指后者涉及诈欺父亲以在遗嘱中获得更多份额。   “这根本就是说谎。”不过,李玮玲没有指名道姓是哪家媒体的报导。   在2017年成立的部长委员会,李显龙的宣誓声明指责,李显扬身为律师的妻子林学芬,有份参与最终遗嘱的拟定。李显龙直指,弟媳林学芬身为利害关係人直接参与遗嘱的订立“耐人寻味”,並且“似乎涉及利益衝突”。   不过,李显扬也已反驳,自己的妻子从未担任李光耀的律师,“父亲的遗嘱在五年前就执行。当父亲完成遗嘱后,告知全家和他的律师,遗嘱由李&李律师事务所保管。”   至于李玮玲,在上述脸书贴文也指出,在2012年,父亲确有打算在遗嘱中分给他较多的份额,但是在2013年,又重新回归到公平分配的决定。…

“或是最后一次出席议事” 吴佩松发文分享最怀念的国会一角

工人党非选区议员吴佩松在脸书发文感叹,自己或许是最后一次出席国会议事。他分享自己将会最怀念的国会一处,就是在图书馆里,当自己抬眼就能望见已故建国总理李光耀的肖像。   吴佩松在个人脸书贴文中写道,这两日将待在国会,参与“坚毅向前”预算案(Fortitude Budget)辩论。   他说这可能是他最后一次出席国会议事,而自己将会最怀念的所在,自然是图书馆。   而当自己在电脑台前工作,间中抬眼小歇片刻,就能看见自己最喜爱的李光耀肖像。   4月21日,新加坡工人党发文告表示,吴佩松因健康原因,已卸下党中委职务和市镇会理事职务。同时也不会参加来届大选。 据知吴佩松数月前就已告知工人党同志,其健康状况每况愈下,自那以后就在接受治疗。他目前已卸下党中委职务并专注于养病,不过仍保留党中委成员。 吴佩松现年47岁,也在国立大学社会学系担任副教授。他目前仍会继续履行他身为非选区议员的职务。

1982年就已征外劳税 要减少对低技术外劳依赖

新加坡国立大学建筑系客座教授郑庆顺,分享一则1982年的剪报。剪报说明打从38年前,为了打造清一色新加坡人的劳动力,当时政府向雇主征收外劳税。 当时的报导这么写道:“对于每名薪资最低1150元的员工,雇主将被征收30巴仙的外劳税”。而该税赋的目的,正是避免雇佣低技术外籍劳工。报导也提到当时政府有意在10年时间减少对外籍劳工的依赖,放眼1992年劳动力清一色都是新加坡人。 对此,工人党前非选区议员余振忠感叹,我们究竟走偏了多远,今日我国与澳洲、新西兰、日本、香港和欧洲国家已渐行渐远,这些国家建筑领域主要仍依赖本地人。 相对而言,我国的生产力已落后,需要很多年、行业进行结构性转变,才能取得重大改进。 外籍劳动力142万人 根据人力部的统计,截至2019年12月,我国的外籍劳动力(包括外籍女佣和建筑工友等),高达142万人口。 人力部长杨莉明在今年五月初的国会也证实,其中本地43个大型客工宿舍,共容纳20万客工;9万5000名客工住在1200座工厂改造宿舍、2万客工住在建筑工地临时住处。 回顾1982年的新年献词,已故建国总理李光耀提到,须在1991年达到劳动力完全由新加坡人组成。当时他认为,依靠大量移工在社会、政治和经济层面都不可取。他以法国、英国和当时的西德为例,大量移工劳动力也延伸很大的社会问题。 黄循财:“减少建筑客工不实际” 然而,近期国家发展部长黄循财则指出,目前有32万名客工在建筑业工作,不过要找到愿意在建筑工地从事苦力活的国人并非易事,因此我国仍需依赖这些客工。

Clean sweep for Legion of Racers simracers at eRacing Grand Prix Southeast Asia

Singaporean simracers Ar Muhammad Aleef Mohamed Rafik and Jason Tay have clinched…