the following is a statement delivered by Ms Braema Mathi, President of MARUAH, at the 18th Regular Session of the UN Human Rights Council, Universal Periodic Review (UPR) Plenary on Singapore.


Thank you, Madam President. I am making this statement as a representative of Article 19, an international political and civil rights group and MARUAH, human rights NGO in Singapore.

Madam President, I speak as civil society working within Singapore. Much has changed in Singapore since the State under Review event on May 6th. The General Election on May 7th was a watershed the ruling party – People’s Action Party – saw its popularity drop to an all time low of 60.14 per cent, and it lost a Group Representation Constituency – whereby five candidates stand on a single ballot – to the Opposition, leading to the loss of two Cabinet Ministers.

Last month, an unprecedented four candidates contested the Presidential Elections. It was hard-fought, and finally the former Deputy Prime Minster, Dr Tony Tan became President with about 35 per cent of votes

My colleagues and I believe that Singapore is poised for change. The people want more space, more say in policy-making discussions, and more freedom to express themselves without just resorting to the anonymity of social media.

There is a definite expressed change in the relationship between the government and the people. The citizens are making their views known. Post-election analyses done by think-tanks, political parties, civil society reflect a chasm between the people and the government. Much of the dissatisfaction centres around access to job opportunities, lack of – perceived or real –  adequate protection against foreigners taking jobs, rise in costs of living especially on housing and a frustration of  still being  ‘nannied’ by the government which limits political and civil liberties for the citizens, for their own good and based on fear.

Given this backdrop, Madam President, it is imperative that the government loosens its grip on the civil and political freedoms for its people and also increases transparency on its decisions and policies.

As such it is disheartening that these elections and after  acknowledging a readiness to change – the government has not supported the civil and political liberty recommendations (38 of the 114 in the Working Group on the UPR report ((A/HRC/18/11) in the outcome report.

There was also no support for the setting up in due course of a national human rights institution or the ratification of International Treaties such as the ICCPR or the ICESCR or the Optional Protocols to CEDAW or CRC. ( Recommendation 96.22 – 96.24; 96.1- 96.18)

Thus much will remain status quo – defamation laws, Newspaper Printing and Publishing Act, laws for preventive detention, no moratorium on the death penalty, no anti-discrimination laws.

A case in point –  last week, Malaysia announced that it will abolish its Internal Security Act, the main source of its powers of preventive detention. Just one day later, the Singapore government announced that it will not do the same, even though our legislation is historically linked to Malaysia’s.

The elections may have changed many things, but certainly not our civil liberties in Singapore. Please do know that we congratulate our government for wanting to ratify the Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities and setting up a multi-agency taskforce to study the Palermo Protocol and the implications.

The government of Singapore has done many things right. They have succeeded at many things. Nevertheless Singaporeans remain frustrated at the continued stifling of rights, by a government that is still too cautious.

MARUAH urges our government to work towards civil and political liberties as a priority focus for the next UPR. We will play our part. I  thank all members of the HRC community for their valuable contributions in this discussion.


Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Even if these men fail…

Remember those who still need our help, says Andrew Loh.

Shame on you TNP! Shame on you!

Blogger DK is incensed at the New Paper’s irresponsibility over H1N1 report.

涉发布诋毁宗教内容 一党员遭前进党暂停党籍

昨日(20日),内政部长兼律政部长尚穆根在脸书揭露,脸书粉丝专页“国大无神论者协会”(NUS Atheist Society)涉嫌发布诋毁伊斯兰教和基督教的贴文,并指警方已介入调查。 目前脸书已屏蔽有关贴文,尚穆根强调这类冒犯性言论不容于多元族群和宗教的新加坡社会。 有关贴文指若厕纸出现短缺,可用上述宗教的圣经书页来代替。 新加坡国立大学则澄清,该大学与上述专页毫无关联,也不隶属于国大,专页的内容不代表国大的立场。 前进党也在今日发文告,指该党已暂停一名党员Jan Chan党籍,待内部调查结果出炉将采取行动。该党强调与上述“国大无神论者协会”没有关联。 “前进党认真看待党员的行为,并致力确保所有党员都遵循法律。” 据《今日报》报导,有关30岁男子Jan Chan毕业于国大,2014年曾加入国民团结党,较后担任组织秘书,退党后加入前进党。

With LKY now gone, will dissension become even more common?

I think it would be fair to say that when the late…