~ By Leong Sze Hian ~

Amy (not her real name) came to our free financial counselling session with her 39 year old brother David (not his real name), David's wife and their one year old son. Despite numerous appeals to HDB they are still homeless.

From homeless shelter to homeless

David's family of three have been homeless for about a month. They were evicted from a homeless shelter as they had been staying there for more than a year, at a rental of about $100 a month. They have been on the waiting list for a HDB rental flat for about one and a half years.

Financial assistance

In addition to the homeless shelter assistance , they also received $80 in supermarket vouchers every month for six months, and $30 in vouchers for the following three months. David works as a driver-cum-deliveryman on the permanent night shift from 11 p.m. to 11 a.m., six to seven days a week, with a gross monthly pay now of about $1,500.

 Living in an office

His wife and one year old son sleeps in his employer's office, from around 11 p.m. to 6 a.m. everyday, with the permission of his employer. They accompany him on his delivery work from around 6 a.m. to 11 a.m. everyday,  as the office premises is not available when work starts to pick up at the office from around 6 a.m.

Resting in public places

They spend their time from around 11 a.m. to 11 p.m. wandering around to pass the time everyday. For David to get some rest, any public place, like void decks, would have to do. What struck me the hardest during the session with Amy and David's family, was when David's wife asked “For how long more do we have to live like this?"

You May Also Like

分享讽刺视频 网民接资媒局警告信要求撤下

日前,警方和资讯通信媒体发展局(IMDA)发出联合声明,基于网红普丽蒂(Preetipls)的视频被指含侮辱内容,接受警方调查,而呼吁民众不要重新上载或分享有关视频。 本周一,本地Youtube网红“美丽求求你”普丽蒂(Preeti Nair,简称Preetipls),相信是不满电子付费平台epay拍摄的广告宣传照欠缺敏感度,也拍摄讽刺视频回应。 但有关视频在当天中午就被令撤下,警方稍后发文告指有人就普丽蒂上载的视频报案,视频被指含有侮辱性内容。 虽然原视频已遭撤下,但不久后仍有不少网民在脸书和youtube等平台重新上载,遭其他网民疯传。对此警方在前日发文呼吁民众停止在网络散播普丽蒂的视频。 事实上确实有网民,只因为分享视频结果接到资媒局的警告信,要求在六小时内把分享链接和贴文删除。其中社运分子范国瀚也中招。 范国瀚在脸书无奈写道:“我收到要求撤下普丽蒂视频的通知,根据资媒局,如果任由视频散播,会造成族群仇视和纠纷。”他也挖苦道,视频只能留在脸书六个小时,所以还没看的宜从速。 至于另一网民也把资媒局的信函分享在个人脸书,但他认为对于国人族群问题不应被扫在地毯下,大家更应该继续帮助少数族群维护权益。 网红“美丽求求你”拍摄的讽刺视频,亦引起许多争议。有部分网民认为政府有“双重标准”的嫌疑。针对新传媒的争议广告,只需要致歉,然而对网红兄妹的惩罚反而“严正以待”,甚至出动警方调查。  

Hong Kong govt offices reopen after temporary closure following rally on Sun

A day after closing down its offices in central Hong Kong in…

Why the Tin Pei Ling saga just won’t die down

The following is an excerpt of an article posted today at Sgpolitics.…

社论:为何无法公开新保网袭主谋?

昨日,主管网络安全事务的通讯及新闻部长易华仁,在国会针对新保网袭事件指出,尽管已经明确知道发动网袭的主谋,但政府决定不公开袭击者身份,因为“不符合国家利益”。 根据《联合早报》报导,易华仁称“已经采取适当行动,也知道袭击者的身份。”但是基于国家安全理由,他不愿多加置评,却又没说明已经采取了什么“适当行动”。 这与易华仁在去年八月底部长声明有别,他当时说,尽管掌握把握袭击者身份,却无法百分百确定。 也有议员追问,究竟我国对袭击者采取了什么行动?易华仁也遭质问政府不揭露袭击者的考量。 对此,易华仁指出,我国现在并非没有法律对境内袭击者采取行动,而是公开指名道姓,“是否会我国有利。” 与此同时,他又告知议员们不应只专注于为何政府公开袭击者身份,而是要了解政府的反应和应对措施。 银行遭劫  保安被解雇  却不公布劫匪身份? 吊诡的是,新保集团和IHiS公司因为网袭事件被惩戒,被罚款100万元,还有两名IHiS员工还为此丢了饭碗,一些高层则接受被罚款(却未公布罚款金额)。 打个比方形容:一家银行被手段老练的抢匪打抢了,保安人员因为防守不力被解雇、银行经理被罚款,但是打抢银行、仍逍遥法外的犯罪份子,他们的身份却基于“银行利益”必须保密?把钱放入银行的客户也不得而知,究竟是谁抢了银行? 根据个资保护委会的文告,去年发生的新保集团网袭事件历来最严重,导致约150万名病人的个人资料被盗,还有约16万人的门诊配药记录被泄露,当中包括总理李显龙与数名部长的记录。…