~by: Leong Sze Hian~

I refer to the report “Over S$78m in Medifund aid given to needy in FY2010” (Channel NewsAsia, Mar 12).

It states that “Successful applications also went up by 22 per cent to more than 480,000 in 2010”.

In previous years, the statistics would also say what percentage of Medifund applications was successful. I believe the last reported figure was that about 99 per cent of applications were successful.

However, for this year, I am unable to find any mention of this statistic.

Actually, what is perhaps an even more significant statistic may be – what percentage of patients who applied was unsuccessful? (Note: “Applications are not equivalent to patients. A patient may make multiple applications for each hospitalisation and/or outpatient attendance bill”)

A patient who applies say 12 times in a year would be counted as 12 successful applications. Whereas a patient who is unsuccessful the first time, may never apply again.

Medifund criteria – secret?

What is the criteria for approving Medifund applications?

As I understand it, the only public information that is available in this regard, is that those who cannot pay for their medical bills can apply through the medical provider.

I have been told that to be successful, basically all family members must have hardly any Medisave in their accounts that can be used, have hardly any money in the bank, cannot stay in a 5-room HDB or bigger HDB flat or private property, etc.

I also understand that in order to be admitted to Class C and B2 ward or treatment, which are the only classes whereby Medifund can be used, a patient must be referred by a polyclinic or if the patient has a medical benefits card referral from a private clinic participating in the Primary Care Partnership Scheme (PCPS).

Medifund cannot use for polyclinic?

Medifund also cannot be used for polyclinic out-patient general consultation treatment, such that the medical providers have been raising funds through their own efforts to help such patients who cannot pay.

After writing off $90 million, patients still owe public hospitals $110 million.  

Medifund have surplus?

Despite the above statistics and Medifund use restrictions, $76 million of Medifund unultilised (surplus) has been transferred to the protected reserves. (Note: “The protected reserves comprise accumulated unutilised interest monies that were locked-up at the change-over of Government in December 2001 and May 2006. Authorisation from the President is required before the protected reserves can be used”)

Funds not allocated based on patients' needs?

I am rather puzzled as to why once again, the total assistance given by Medifund-approved institutions (MFIs) to patients formed less than (98%) the Medifund and Medifund Silver grants disbursed by MOH to MFIs in FY10. Utilisation of allocated funds increased compared to FY09. Any unspent funds will be carried over to assist patients in the next financial year.

As I understand it, MOH allocates a grant to each MFI at the beginning of the year for the whole year, and MFIs have to be prudent in ensuring that the grant is sufficent for the whole year. So, it is not based on the needs of patients for the year, but rather like how well the MFI is able to keep within the allocation for the whole year. In such a system, is it any wonder that there is always under-ultilised  funds, as no MFI would want to find itself in a situation whereby there is no money left for needy patients before the year ends?

So, does it mean that total disbursements from Medifund for the year may be more dependent on the interest from the Medifund Endowment Fund, rather than the needs of patients?

Endowment transfers means less Budget surplus?

The Medifund and Medifund Silver Endowment funds now stand at $1,973.3 million, with a capital injection of $200 million last year. In this connection, our Budget surpluses may have been in a sense, under-reported in comparison with other countries, as such transfers are made almost annually to the various endowment funds, like Medifund and the ComCare fund.


Support TOC! Buy Uncle Leong’s book here!

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

新加坡成热门地!香港富豪忧“送中”影响急撤资海外

当香港示威仍如火如荼进行着,抗议要求撤回《逃犯条例》修法,许多商业巨头也纷纷将资产往外转移,其中热门地点是新加坡。 据《金融时报》20日报导,提及过去新加坡交易所(SGX)的执行副总裁周士达曾在去年3月指出,尽管香港证券及期货事务监察委员会否认,但他们确实受中国证券监督管理委员会管制,指香港是“半离岸市场”。 周士达也认为,从2017年加拿大籍华侨萧建华被不明人士从其所在的香港的四季酒店带走,并被押解回内地,关押在北京配合调查可见,意味着香港已不再是高净值人士的安全场所。 萧建华是中国著名投资公司“明天系”的幕后控制人。经过他多年的幕后活动,“明天系”拥有数家在中国大陆上市的公司,以及无数分布全国各地的分公司,成为中国大陆数一数二的资本操作代表。 新加坡和香港一直都在竞争亚洲金融中心的地位。 忧资产被中国移走,香港富豪纷撤资 一名协助资产转移的财务顾问向《路透社》透露,已有富豪将逾一亿美金(约1亿3600万新元)从香港的花旗银行,转入新加坡的花旗银行。他表示,“已经开始了,我们也听到了其他人这么做,但不会有人到处声张他们要离开。” “他们恐惧北京政府将会透过香港对付他们,将他们的资产移走,而新加坡也成为他们首选之地。”该名财务顾问表示。 一名匿名国际银行的私人银行业务执行经理也证实,转移资产的人均属香港人居多,而不是那些可能“被政治曝光”的大陆客户。 “如今香港现况已开始不受控,他们无法相信特首林郑月娥与北京领导者如此愚蠢,无法预见对经济严重损坏的情况。”他说道。 香港美国商会(American Chamber…

“Dog-whistling” and “pitch-forking” only serves to alienate, says Prof Donald Low

The “scurrilous” attack on Workers’ Party (WP) chief and MP Pritam Singh…

DBS: S'pore retrenchments expected to reach 45,600, GDP growth revised to -5.7% this year

According to a DBS report on Monday (27 April), retrenchments in Singapore…

"For Singapore to progress, we cannot operate on this paradigm of a scorched earth policy" – WP's Yee Jenn Jong

Recently we’ve been inundated with coverage on the High Court decision that…