Leong Sze Hian/

Mr Lim Kim San, was called Mr HDB, as he volunteered to be chairman of the Housing Development Board (HDB) when it was established in 1960. He took no salary for the first three years of his stint at the HDB and only started taking a salary in 1963, when he became Singapore’s National Development Minister, after winning his debut into politics as a fresh Member of Parliament. He subsequently became the Finance and Defence Minister.

During his tenure as Chairman of HDB, Mr Lim Kim San was given the daunting task of providing low-cost public housing for about 400,000 people who were staying in squatter and make-shift homes.

Against all odds and to the chagrin of his critics, he built about 25,000 HDB flats in the first three years.

It was an eye-opener to what a dedicated and determined public servant could do, following on the then dismal performance of the Singapore Investment Trust (SIT) which was the provider of public housing before 1960. Indeed, some credited him with saving the PAP – which at that time was untested –  by solving Singapore’s housing problem.

Then and now – why we need another Lim Kim San

Today, the National Development Minister also volunteered for the job, from his previous appointment as the Health Minister but is paid more than two million dollars a year.

Arguably, his task may be even more onerous, as he may have to play the delicate balancing act of providing affordable public housing to Singaporeans as well as about 600,000 permanent residents (PRs) and about 1.4 million foreigners, most of whom may not be able to afford private housing rentals or purchase.

But it’s astonishing considering that even with today’s advanced building technology, the industry’s capacity to build HDB flats is about 25,000 a year.

This may be one of the reasons why the time that it takes to build and deliver the flats’ keys to buyers is getting longer to an average of about four years, against the former Minister’s statement in Parliament last year that the average construction time was 32 months.

Today, the perennial issue is that National Development Ministers have repeatedly refused to disclose how its Market Pricing Subsidy policy is derived and broken down, other than to say that it is a discount from resale HDB prices.

In this connection, in a welcomed surprise move after the current Minister took office, new BTO prices were slashed substantially according to several market analysts and stakeholders.

However, the Minister denied that BTO prices were slashed by saying that the different locations and types of flats would have different prices.

From the period of Mr Lim’s tenure at the HDB, up till 1984 when Mr The Cheang Wan was National Development Minister, the pricing of HDB flats was broken down into land and construction costs (the last time such breakdown was given was in a New Paper article in 1984).

Today, the HDB today is shrouded in secrecy – even Cash-over-valuation (COV) median prices were abruptly not released anymore recently, citing that they were “misleading”, despite it having been used for some time now as proof that the cooling measures were working.

During Mr Lim’s tenure, HDB flats only cost a few thousand dollars, only Singaporeans could buy or rent, and there were no Resale Levies, 30-month waiting periods when you sell a property, permanent debarment from HDB loans for private property or Executive Condominium (EC) owners, income ceilings, etc.

For the estimated 30,000 plus HDB flat owners who are in arrears on their HDB and HDB bank loans for more than three months, the thousands who have lost their homes because they couldn’t pay their mortgages anymore, thousands who have been waiting for rental flats for years, tens of thousands trying to get a flat, etc, perhaps what we direly need is another Lim Kim San.


This article is part of a series where contributors were asked for their personal take on who shaped the decades.

Support TOC! Buy Leong Sze Hian’s book here!

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

鄞义林:比较台湾和新加坡的公共医疗服务

鄞义林撰文,北雁译 在亚洲新闻台看到一篇文章,提到名为Serynn Guay的34岁女青年,她其中一项烦恼,是“无法预测”的医疗开销。 她说,“我们不知道当我们年纪大些时,究竟需要多少才够用… 我们能安稳地退休吗?我们的积蓄是否足够?” 她补充,“有可能接下来20年都要继续工作,即使孩子已经大学毕业,我们还要继续为储蓄退休和其他生活开销打拼。” 这里让我和大家分享台湾的情况。 在台湾,医疗保健是免费的,在现有的国家保健和退休计划下,一个从现在起工作40年的人,大约能以现有薪资的60巴仙养老。 所以,台湾人不会感受到新加坡人一样的忧虑。他们知道只要身体不适,都能接受有素质的医疗服务,无需感到恐惧,或担心负担不起而不敢去看医生。 他们也知道,到了退休年龄就真的可以退休,他们也很向往退休生活。 但是在我国,国人缴税、也支付保健储蓄和终身健保,但是还是很怕看医生。 在台湾,员工只需为医疗保险支付薪资的一巴仙,就能享有免费医疗保健。但是在新加坡,我们把薪资的8-10.5巴仙都放入保健储蓄,也不能享有完全免费的医保。而且,还要自掏腰包负担最昂贵的医疗服务。…

疑GPS故障走错地点 女私召车司机大雨中轰乘客下车

手机程序中的导航系统出现纰漏,乘客也告知送错地点了,但是女私召车司机却不顾外面下着倾盆大雨,强迫乘客下车。 署名本杰明的网民指出,上述事件发生于周二(10月22日)上午。 他于当天上午要从位于杨厝港路嘉城林的住家,前往工作地点,即位于巴耶利峇路155号的Lotus 诊所。 “当时约早上7时30分,我已经迟到了……天空下着大雨,所以我就在家预约了私召车Gojek服务。” 曾多次反映皆被无视 他对网络新闻网站《Stomp》指出,在路上,他发现有关女私召车司机没有照正确路线行驶,虽然尝试告诉女司机,但是她仍坚持跟着导航走。 本杰明表示他多次反映,但女司机最终竟要求他在比莱1号路下车,而该处距离其目的地仍有1.3公里。 “虽然我不断尝试说服她,说她到达了错误地点,但是她却威胁我说,若我不下车,她就报警。” 本杰明指出,他当时无奈地在大雨中下车,随后还要另外花费八元,预订Grab私召车服务,从比莱路前往诊所。 他表示,当他回顾此事,意识到或许是Gojek应用程序中的GPS出现了故障所致。“这是可以理解的,类似事件时有发生。” 惟,令他震惊和难以接受的是,许多私召车司机都缺乏基本常识,而且工作时过于依赖GPS。…

Singapore must proceed with its Population White Paper or else?

Rolled back immigration and tightened foreign labour The Straits Times article,“The Population…