by Gerald Giam

Two weeks ago, when I first read the news of the protests in Egypt, which followed the popular uprising and toppling of the government in Tunisia, I cynically remarked to my wife that the protests will carry on for a few days then fizzle out. Life in Egypt will then return to “normal” under the authoritarian rule of President Hosni Mubarak, who has been in power for the past 30 years.

How wrong I was–and how glad I am that I was wrong! Just over an hour ago, Mubarak’s resignation was announced on state television by his recently-appointed vice-president, Omar Suleiman. Following that brief 30-second message, scenes of jubilation erupted on Tahrir (Liberation) Square in central Cairo. Al Jazeera reported of protesters dropping to their knees in prayer and then rising and chanting “God is great”. A 30-year old Egyptian Al Jazeera reporter dropped all pretences of impartiality and shared that all her life she had known no other leader but Mubarak, and described her feelings of elation at his departure. Even the state television station newscaster reportedly cracked a smile after reading out her report. CNN reported that demonstrations initiated over the Internet, on Facebook and Twitter, had resulted in the downfall of the Middle East’s strongest dictators.

This is a momentous occasion for not just Egypt but the entire Arab world. Indeed, the “people power” revolution in Egypt will be an inspiration for all freedom-loving people in oppressed nations around the world.

I visited Egypt about six years ago as part of a diplomatic delegation when I was working in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. From our meetings with academics, journalists and officials there, I got the distinct impression that this was not just a great ancient civilisation, but a nation brimming with suppressed intellect and potential. At the time I was there, the main opposition leader, Ayman Nour, had just been released from prison and there were minor street protests against the government led by the Kifiya (Enough) movement. In the six years that passed since, little seemed to have changed. Nour would later get convicted and jailed again, following a creditable run at the presidency in the elections that year.

Last week, I watched a BBC programme which interviewed some educated Egyptians at local cafes to ask them for their views on the protests. One middle aged woman remarked that the young people on Tahrir Square were doing what her generation always wanted to do but never dared to.

Indeed, every nation has its generation of heroes, who often comprise of the younger generation–more energetic, more idealistic and less cynical of the possibility of change. I believe Singapore’s time for change will come soon. For the past 50 years, we too have been under the authoritarian rule of a party that pays lip service to the ideals of democracy and political freedom. While we have not suffered from the same economic mismanagement that Egypt has, our level of political suppression exceeds that of Egypt in many ways. For example, even a one-man protest is disallowed under “public order” laws passed just last year. How will we ever see scenes of hundreds of thousands of pro-democracy demonstrators thronging the Padang?

A march along St Andrew's Road outside City Hall, 1964.

Yet I remain hopeful in the sensibility of Singaporeans. While I do not wish to see mass protests bringing our economy to a standstill, I hope that this election year, Singaporeans from all walks of life and all generations will turn out in force at election rallies to declare their support for democracy and freedom from fear. I hope that my fellow citizens will take the time and effort to study the candidates and their track records carefully, and vote with their hearts and their heads, not out of fear or ignorance.

We can have our own “mini-revolution” this year by giving the ruling party a historically low popular vote (less than 60 per cent will do the trick) and breakthrough with one or more GRCs. This is a prospect that I am much less cynical about, than I was about the Egyptian revolution!

The writer is an Executive Council member of the Workers’ Party. This article was first published in geraldgiam.sg


Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Singapore household balance sheet based on data from Singstat

By Chris Kuan : This is an interesting chart from Bloomberg about…

印度司法程序严重延宕 新印商贸关系是否应更谨慎?

日前,《彭博社》于周二发表一篇文章,强调在印度做生意是多么困难,尤其是他们臭名昭著的司法程序,更是出了名的延宕。这样的延宕严重影响了企业的发展,甚至是损毁了双方的交易。 到底印度在司法程序上,其延宕程度到什么地步?印度最高法院最近颁布一项裁决,也揭示了其严重的延宕程度。一个于1982年将涉嫌伪造姜黄的案件,竟然拖至38年后才完成所有的司法程序,更离奇的是,最终仅被判一个月监禁和500元卢比(约6.70元新币)的罚款。 据了解,该案件在十年后,最高法院撤销了被告的定罪,而且两个下级法院花了约14年的时间才作出判决。 尽管该案看似相当离谱的司法程序,但它也非特别案例。目前印度的三级司法系统中,有近4千万个案件仍在待审中。而在印度的25个邦中的各个高级法院,已有逾17万3千个案例已超过20年,即每个州属平均可能将会有7千宗案例是逾20年以上的待审案件。甚至有近一半的案件已待定逾30年,这还不包括少于20年的待定案件。 印度也被世界银行列为倒数第15位,比巴基斯坦、叙利亚和塞内加尔还要糟糕。若没有一个良好有效的法律制度监督合同的进行,合同的法律效益等于无效,而且当有人违反合同时,也无法即时得到反响。 印度的延宕臭名昭彰,为何我国仍坚决加入CECA? 长期的司法延宕让印度最大的公司趁虚而入,完成许多大规模的交易,如综合健保控股(IHH Healthcare)试图取代印度富通医疗服务集团(Fortis Healthcare Ltd),却因日本制药公司第一三共株式会社(Daiichi Sankyo)申请的庭令而遇阻。 第一三共和富通保健的创办人辛格兄弟对簿公堂,印度最高法院下令IHH暂缓收购交易。辛格兄弟当时也接受印度当局的欺诈调查。…

PAP Ministers and MPs visit wake of billionaire Popiah King Sam Goi’s son

The son of billionaire Sam Goi, Ben Goi, 43, died on Sunday…

徐顺全吁国人共同参与、加倍努力推动国家改变

“我们邀请国人一起参与,为推动更好的新加坡改革而努力,让2019年成为真正欢乐、有意义的新一年!” 新加坡民主党秘书长徐顺全于本月2日,于脸书发表贴文,欢迎2019年的带来,并表示民主党重申该党承诺,将加倍努力“为国家和人民带来积极的改变”。 文告指出,2018年更像是百物上涨和经济萧条的一年,也看不见现任政府有新意和开明地施政,来应对眼前的问题。 “唯一可以肯定的是,当权者透过起诉和提告对付那些发表异议的公民、打压独立新闻网站,且有意立法来进一步钳制公共舆论。” 徐顺全指出,如果再不做出改变,国人眼前将面对更艰难的时期。例如千禧世代,因为难以找到有意义的工作,面对就业困难;房价对他们来说仍是难以负担,还有毕业穷忙族群体的人数也在增长。 至于中年国人处境也好不到哪里。百物上涨加上消费税增加,家庭面临更大的财务压力。受薪成年人下要抚养孩子,上有年迈两老要照顾,面对的负荷有别于以往。 正当裁员正威胁着好些国人的生计,人民行动党政府仍执意要引进更多外籍人士来就业,国人实在很难再2019看到光明前景;当行动党最终承认,越临近99年屋契到期的公共组屋价值会下降,更令一度把组屋视为增值和寄托“以房养老”梦想的年长者梦碎。 再者,行动党仍执意要把人民丁点血汗钱继续所在公积金最低存款中,财务保障和退休几乎成了国人的天方夜谭。 “然而,我们的部长们仍领取天价薪资、继续享受舒适生活。这些自私的领袖们为国家带来灾难。” 透露民主党将推展一系列活动 然而,徐顺全在帖文中指出,这种困境不会是永久的,只要共同努力,可以扭转局面。他透露,民主党为新加坡描绘一个不同的愿景,也退出一些替代政策来解决当前的问题,希望能打造一个更平等、幸福的社会。 他透露迈入2019年,该党将马不停蹄开展一系列活动,以应对来届选举,至于具体的计划将在未来数周公布。