by Leong Sze Hian

I refer to the article “Muslims can be both religious and patriotic” (ST, Jan 30).

It states that “Dr Yaacob was speaking to reporters while at Mendaki, the Muslim self-help organisation, to present cheques for a range of community projects. A total of $370,000 was given out to 39 organisations to fund programmes to help less privileged Malay-Muslim families”.

Does this mean that on the average each of the 39 organisations received about $9,487 ($370,000 divided by 39)?

How many “less privileged Malay-Muslim families” will be helped on the average, by each organisation?

How much help?

If each organisation helps say just 100 families, does it mean that the programmes providing assistance on a per family basis, may only be worth about $8.20 a month ($9,487 divided by 100 families by 12 months)?

And what happens after 12 months (in the above example) when the funding runs out?

In this connection, it was reported in the media in 2006 that a common electronic database of 105,000 Malay-Muslim recipients of financial aid programmes in Singapore had been launched.

So, how many of these 105,000 still need help, and how many will be helped by how much, by the subject funding of $370,000?


Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Company under investigation by CAD continues to send out invoices to businesses

Company under investigation by Commercial Affairs Department (CAD) continues to send out…

各国”反假新闻法“比一比

我国总理李显龙在本月9日,在新马领导人非正式会议后的联合记者会上,被记者质问其对防假消息法的立场。 记者指防假消息法遭到新加坡国内外人士质疑,包括”无国界记者“组织也抨击新法案可能赋予政府过大权力。 当时,总理表示,不清楚马国打算废除的《反假新闻法》内容,不过他捍卫新加坡政府要推行的《防止网络假消息和网络操纵法案》,指出不止新加坡,德国、法国和澳洲都有立法对付,连英国也考虑透过司法管制网络假消息。 既然总理提到其他国家也有反假新闻法,本社简略整理我国和其他四个国家:法、德、澳洲和马来西亚相关“反假新闻法”,对比其中的区别: 各国“假消息法”类型 《2019年防止网络假消息与网络操纵法案》 2019年4月1日在国会一读 2018年,出台第2018-1202法令和2018-1201组织性法案,打击信息操纵 2018年出台《社交网络强制法》(Netzwerk-durchsetzung-sgesetz,简称NetzDG) 澳洲国会于本月4日通过《分享重大暴力内容》刑法典修正案(Criminal Code Amendment…

TOC may not last another 5 years

~by: Ravi Philemon~ the following is the transcript of my welcome speech…

【冠状病毒19】逾20人群聚包厢 火锅餐馆停业10天罚2000元!

违反防疫措施,允许超过20人在包厢内群聚,海鲜捞火锅餐馆遭新加坡旅游局下令停业10天,并罚款2000元。   旅游局执法人员于8月14日,发现有超过20人同时离开该家位于乌节路邵氏大厦内的一家海鲜火锅餐厅,因此展开调查。   当局发现,餐厅并没有确保客户群聚人数不能超过五人,且该客户群甚至坐在餐厅内一间可上锁的私人包厢内。   餐厅员工在执法人员到来时,并没有给予合作调查,甚至反应过激,企图阻止执法人员们进入餐厅和私人包厢。   当局指出,该餐厅公然违反了阻断措施复苏时期的禁令,即允许顾客在晚上10时半后饮酒,客户群之间没有保持一米距离、以及客户群人数必须限制在五人以内。   当局指出,已经加强复苏时期的旅游区和场所监控,并将会在需要时,部署更多执法人员和安全距离大使。