photos by Joshua Chiang and Terry Xu

It all started when the Hindu Endowment Board (HEB) guidelines for Thaipusam celebrations were made public this year. Those planning to participate in the festival were told that they had to refrain from shouting, playing recorded music, sounding gongs or drums, painting their faces and bodies, carrying banners, flags or postcards, and using a public address system.

Anyone caught breaking the rules risked being barred from future processions, as well as a fine of up to $5,000 under the Public Order Act.

As the news spread, the internet was ablaze with indignation.

“If you can’t even tolerate a traditional Singapore festival for 1 out of 365 days (and it’s not at 10pm, but 10am!), you shouldn’t be living in Singapore,” a blogger wrote.

“How a person practices his religion is [for] him to decide so long it is within the framework of the law and without disturbing the other [people]. I am a Chinese but personally feel this Hindu celebration adds wealth to our national culture.” A commenter added on The Online Citizen.

But there were others who saw nothing wrong with the guidelines.

TOC reader S Ramamritham wrote that the Hindu religious event is being “put to ridicule particularly by some kavadi carriers and supporters with their improper conduct, behaviour and even dressing”.

The guidelines are there “to enhance and bring out the religious sanctity of the event”.

When the ST report on the rules first came out, some Singaporeans were quick to take offense – pointing out that they should also apply to other religious festivals, not just Thaipusam.

Since then, Home Affairs and Law Minister K Shanmugam has clarified that the ST’s report was inaccurate.

The guidelines, we’re told, apply to “all religious processions, not just Thaipusam“. They’ve been around for 38 years, and contrary to what the ST had suggested, they were actually eased this year, to allow the singing of hymns.

But not everyone’s convinced. A shopowner at Little India who identified himself as “Mr Shan” told TOC, “Why all the while few years back, they never enforce the (ban against) musical instruments? Why this year they say want to stop? What reason they have to stop this?”

[youtube id=”HgYQF4f7asU” align=”center” mode=”normal”]

TOC understands that in previous years, Thaipusam festivities have been occasionally disrupted by unruly youths. Witnesses say they would show up drunk, sing obscene songs and make a nuisance of themselves.

Perhaps the guidelines are being enforced this year as a means of containing that sort of behavior.

According to the Straits Times report, noise pollution was another reason for the move.

Mr K. Kannappan, trustee of the Sri Thendayuthapani Temple, said some residents along the procession’s 4km route from Serangoon Road to Tank Road complained about the noise last year. “So this year, we will be better neighbours,” he added.

(“Thaipusam set to tone down volume”, ST Jan 6)

But Mr Shan disagreed.

“Just tell me how many housing block flats. You can hardly count,” he said. “In Selegie Road you have a few flats and Upper Serangoon Road a few flats. That’s all only. And all the way from Tank Road to Penang Road, there is no housing block flats. Only shophouses and some buildings.”

One of the few residential buildings along the procession route

Regardless of reasons, Mr Shanmugam appeared to be taking a sterner approach this year, warning that anyone who persists in breaking the rules, not just during Thaipusam but at any other religious procession, will be “dealt with”. However, he also added that police officers at the procession would be allowed to “exercise discretion”.

TOC went to witness the procession on the morning of 20th Jan. While there was loud music and a festive atmosphere inside the temples, it was markedly quieter outside.

Most of the kavadi carriers were accompanied by only one tabla drummer. There were people singing religious hymns. Occasionally a kavadi bearer would break into a spinning frenzy and his supporters would cheer. But overall, the tone was subdued.

A plastic stool would most probably qualify as a banned musical instrument under the HEB guidelines

“In comparison to what I observed from last year’s encounter of Thaipusam, the atmosphere and volume is of stark difference,” said  TOC photographer Terry Xu.

Still, if the following Youtube videos are any indication, there were pockets of defiance. Despite the threat of punishment, some people were clearly not afraid of making their displeasure known.

[youtube id=”iM2E9dGytVw” align=”center” mode=”normal”]

 

Subscribe
Notify of
3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

SM Teo Chee Hean says the Constitution will ensure 21 alternative voices in Parliament, but can they vote on the Bills?

The Constitution will ensure that at least 21 alternative voices are present…

生意难做!客人不守社交距离 餐饮业者忧连累餐厅被关!

生意难做!餐饮业者吐苦水,客人不遵守安全预防规定,业者屡劝不果,还被社交距离官员警告罚款,业者无奈只好举报警察。 在疫情的侵袭下,全球的生活形态也开始改变,人们出门都必须戴上口罩,保持好社交安全距离,但似乎仍有部分人无视这些规定。 Vatos Urban Tacos的创办人兼大厨的美国韩裔金新翰,昨日在脸书直言,一些客户不遵守社交安全举例,即使已经限制每桌人数,但他们仍然会聚集,在三番四次的规劝也仍然不听劝。 他举例,他在南岸的分店就遇到这种“奥客”。两张分坐五人桌的客人,却聚集在一起,即使被他的员工全说了三四次还是不听劝。“每一次我们都有劝他们不要聚集,但他们只会回复”好的好的“,五分钟后,又开始故态复萌。20分钟后,一名社交距离大使进来,并警告我们如果回来再让他看见这样的情形就开罚单,甚至可能被勒令关闭。” “今晚在荷兰村,又有四人桌和三人卓的客人继续并桌交流。我的经理也上前规劝,奈何他们直接忽视,经理只好给出严厉警告。最终我们只能请客人离开。但客人不愿意。” 无可奈何之下,他们只好报警处理,但现场仍然有客人将照片拍下,并表示将会举报违反社交安全距离的行为,让他相当无奈。 他也在文内呼吁客人应该要遵守社交安全距离,因为不仅仅关系到餐厅的营业,更很可能影响了店内员工的生计。 “对于客人而言,或许违反社交安全规定并不那么重要,但对于餐厅而言,它很可能就是面临生死问题。许多餐饮业可能会被罚上高额罚款,还要被强制关闭10天,都可能是导致餐饮业者倒闭的最后稻草。我们许多员工的生计也取决我们对于此事的处理,故不便之处,敬请理解。” 他在文末也道出该欲违反社交安全距离的客人的结果。他表示,该群客人在警察来到前以离开,因为若他们选择不走,可能将会如同之前在罗拔申码头聚集喝酒的人的下场。 “请勿将餐厅置于这样的情况,因为我相信大多数业者将会选择保护自己和员工,而不是一群被驱逐出境的外籍人士。”…

Leong Mun Wai questions Minister’s use of the term, ‘absconded’ in case of Lee Hsien Yang and Lee Suet Fern

PSP’s Leong Mun Wai criticized the government for publicly naming Lee Hsien Yang and Lee Suet Fern as under police investigation while withholding names in the Keppel bribery case. He disputed labelling the Lees as having “absconded” and questioned the government’s handling of the matter.

Public warned of new type of loan scam over WhatsApp involving fake government documents

Members of the public are warned of a new type of loan…