by Rachel Chan

What could Singaporeans expect from the opposition party founded by the late Joshua Benjamin Jeyaretnam? Would they try to raise anti-incumbent sentiment amongst the audience? Or would they spend more time outlining alternative policies?

It was a little bit of both.

The Reform Party rally, held at Speaker’s Corner on a rainy Saturday afternoon, continually questioned the actions of the incumbent PAP. But it also managed to raise awareness on many of the alternate solutions available to the issues concerning Singaporeans – mainly the influx of foreigners, high ministerial pay, as well as the increasing income divide.

Alec Tok speaking at the rally

A high point came early in a speech by Alec Tok, one of the party members running for parliament.

“Do you see that white elephant behind you?” he asked. (He was referring to the sheltered stage about fifty meters away, where more than half of those who attended the rally were standing.)

“We are not allowed to use that! We are only allowed to be here. That is why we are standing in the rain. But if you can stand in the rain, than we can also stand in the rain!”

His speech highlighted the importance of improving the productivity of Singapore’s labour force – a key issue he posited is overlooked by the current administration.

This was followed by a speech by Kenneth Jayaretnam, the party leader. “I did national service, I was born here, and my parents were among the first citizens of Singapore,” he said. In his speech, Jeyaretnam carefully highlighted the areas of inadequacy in the current government, but made it clear that change depended on Singaporeans to take action.

“Don’t just go home and vent steam on the internet, and come elections day, get confused into voting for the incumbent for returning a fraction of your tax dollars!” Jeyaretnam told the crowd.

Nonetheless, there were reservations toward some of criticisms levelled against the PAP by the Reform Party. For instance, the vague descriptions of Jeyaretnam’s doubts on the quality of Singapore’s economic growth were not based on concrete facts and figures, but conjectures of transfer pricing.

“I would like to know how much tax these companies pay, how many Singaporeans they employ, what subsidies were given to them to come here, what prices are used to measure the value of their output. It’s possible that because they pay little or no tax in Singapore, that these companies use artificially high prices when they sell their group output to other group companies so as to minimize their tax bills… Whatever this accurses, the net effect may be to inflate our GDP statistics,” Jeyaretnam said.

Be that as it may, Jeyaretnam raised some important questions to the audience on issues, such as affordable long-term housing, savings in CPF, as well as further promising a change on the foreign labour policy and a wider focus on development outside of economic growth.

For many, the rally on Saturday was an opportunity to listen to an alternative voice and possibility of change from the current norm. “I’m just here to look see,” said an elderly man, who refused to be named. Certainly, a fear of being seen as openly supportive of the opposition hung over the event. But beyond this fear, the rally seemed to be channelling voter disaffection over contemporary politics amidst a genuine craving for an alternate solution.

One of the most significant things that can be taken away from the rally was the goal of the Reform Party: they were not just aiming to provide an alternative voice in parliament, or reduce the majority of the PAP, but to form the majority government itself.

“We’re here to form the government, whether it should take one year, ten years, or a hundred years,” Jeyaretnam declared.

But whether the Reform Party can do that will be up to Singaporeans to decide.

Rachel is a final year undergraduate majoring in English, Politics and Psychology at the Australian National University in Canberra.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

PM Lee says valuable to have good university education but Education Minister says skills more important

On Wed (4 Sep), during an hour-long ministerial forum with students of…

Not entirely certain who will be S’pore’s next leader: PM Lee

In an interview with reporters recently, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong was…

慈善组织号召赞助人 筹集购物券赠弱势年长者

慈善组织“乐于助人组织”(Happy People Helping People Community)一直以救济贫穷人士为己任,在疫情期间,许多家庭面临更多困难,为了能够减轻他们的负担,该组织寻求善心人士赞助,让他们能为有需要的弱势群体或家庭,提供职总平价购物券。 “乐于助人组织”表示,尽管我国在6月份即将逐步恢复,但许多社交活动仍无法进行,而且政府也呼吁高风险感染的老年人尽量留在家中。然而,要他们留在家中意味着收入可能会中断,许多人都在困难中挣扎。 为了能够让这些年长者减轻负担,以及减少外出的时间,“乐于助人组织”计划提供他们价值50元的职总平价购物券。为此“乐于助人组织”号召更多热心人士赞助。 “我们诚挚邀请能够为我们赞助价值50元的职总平价购物券,最好是5张10元购物券,给予我们的受惠者。” “乐于助人组织”也邀请自愿人士协助移交购物券给有需要的年长者,这也能确保他们所送出的折扣券能够安全到真正需要的人的手上。 欲提供协助,也可以和“乐于助人组织”联络。

不参与《暴力与骚扰公约2019》表决 杨莉明:纳入家暴超出职场范围

虽然我国认同制定反对职场暴力和骚扰的全球性条约,不过人力部长杨莉明解释,考量到《暴力与骚扰公约2019》“超越职场范围”,因此在联合国属下的国际劳工组织(ILO)于今年6月召开的常年会议中,放弃表决权。 她在国会上发言时,提到劳工组织将如何实施后来通过的新公约,其中包括将家庭暴力纳入职场风险评估范围。 “这将把职场安全远远拓展超出职场范围” 。她在回应有关我国就签署《暴力与骚扰公约2019》表决上弃权一事,作出回应。 在劳工组织于6月21日在瑞士日内瓦召开常年会议时,召集成员国的劳资政代表,就相关公约进行表决,而包括我国在内的六个国家都选择投出弃权票。除了我国,其他的五个国家为俄罗斯、萨尔瓦多、马来西亚、巴拉圭以及吉尔吉斯斯坦。 官委议员王丽婷在国会上询问我国代表团是如何做出投票决定时,杨莉明表示新加坡全国雇主联合会(SNEF)严重关切有关的公约内容,并且对有关条约持有反对意见。 代表工人群体的全国职工总会,尽管清楚知道政府将放弃表决,惟仍投下赞成票以展现对公约的精神支持。 杨莉明表示我国严肃看待条约表决义务,并且我国长期以来的政策都是只考虑通过或批准符合我国利益,且条约法律和政策可完全遵循的公约。 “对于有疑问的部分,我们将继续探讨。” “与此同时,如果符合我们的目标,在符合公约精神下,我们将改进政策和措施。” 她也以劳工组织的《职业安全卫生公约》为例,在有关国际协议于6月份批准之前,我国已经采取并加强措施,成功降低职场的死亡率。 持续打击职场暴力骚扰…