Connect with us

Current Affairs

Radicality – The Singaporean Youth?

Published

on

 

radicality-resized.jpgBy Eddie Choo

Monday, 11 December, 2006

Numbers may be an indication of Singapore’s economic growth, but numbers will not be able to tell us the social development of our society.

The future of every society lies with its youth. It is the youth who will rise and take the reins of leadership, and lead society to the inevitable future. As such, societies worldwide recognise the importance of youth in their society, and go to great extent, to nurture the development of youths. Singapore society is no exception.

The emphasis placed on education has created results, such as those seen in worldwide surveys, where our children are ranked high, if not the first, in mathematics and science – the subjects where performance can be quantified.

However, as Fareed Zakaria has mentioned before, few of our young people end up becoming world-beaters around the world. Answers have been proposed to this paradox, and all of us have our individual answers, but still the questions remains, why don’t we have geniuses?

2 important, pertinent questions

As I started going on this train of thought regarding the education of our youth, it led me to more questions, none of which are fully resolvable. The most pressing question that I asked myself was, what will be needed to face the challenges of globalisation and integration now, as in the present? And the second question, are our youths able to meet those challenges?

I understand that our education system is continuously undergoing changes, so as to prepare our youths for the challenges of working in a society. The concept has been seemingly drummed into us, that the future economy will become based more on knowledge, creativity and innovation. During the course of my education, as students, we paid only lip service to those ideas, rarely ever contemplating the immensity of the challenges that we were being pushed into. As I matured, I soon realised the immensity of these challenges, and through observation, have reached my conclusion that Singapore society as a whole, is barely able to meet those challenges, and that radical revisions will have to be made, to make our society viable and prosperous in the future.

My investigation into globalisation started with the works of Thomas Friedman. To those not familiar with the person, he happens to be a multiple-Pulitzer-winning journalist, whose articles are informative as they are thought provoking. In one of his books (The World is Flat), a sentence appealed to me, that I could almost recite it. It is about the immensity of talent that exists in China, awaiting opportunities to be realised and utilized.

Singapore is still vulnerable

To paraphrase him, it says, in China, when you are one in a million, there are still 1300 people like you (by the way, China’s population is about 1.3 billion). It immediately dawned upon me that Singapore is really vulnerable, and even despite the best efforts in our education system, our lead is only temporary – in a world where people talent is an important consideration for investment, we may still find ourselves vulnerable to the talent that exists in abundance in China and India. Yes, we may still be leaders in some areas, but should we ever be complacent, we may find Singapore’s competitive advantage slowly eroded to the point where investment will just pass us over…

My second observation comes from a statement made by an educator, whose institution and details I will not mention, but nonetheless, the statement seems to be representative of sentiments and attitudes. I can only paraphrase it as ‘when you are in a JC, you are in the top 20th percentile of the student population in Singapore’. To me, it was an indication of an inequality that pervades our education system, and the question to ponder is whether this inequality is necessary, and whether this inequality should be corrected. It reflects the access of knowledge; of which others are seen to be more deserving of knowledge than others.

The Singaporean youth

I have observed ignorance and apathy in our youths, whose lives may sometimes be the pursuit of a fashionable life, in the realms of fashion and music, of MTV-esque presentations and slogans, though nice, deny the viewer of reflection because they are too obvious. There is the silent apathy that our youths seem to possess in abundance, yet there is no cause for concern among them for not knowing, simply because they don’t even know that they don’t know.

It seems to me that the economic future of our nation is dependent on 20% of the youths, a figure that reminds me of the size of the JC-cohort. Yet, the only way a knowledge-based economy can work is with a knowledge-based society, and it seems to me that the rate of information penetration isn’t as high as it should be, for Singapore’s viability to continue. Of course, critics will press me for actual statistics and questions about methodologies and techniques, and though I can’t answer these questions, the message remains; that a significant proportion of our youths are drunken on apathy, that they don’t see their ignorance. How can a knowledge-based-society arise from youths who are unconcerned about what happens in the world from which we are so integrated to for our own survival?

Of course, such generalities will offend many, but they will only offend those who bother to read this article. I am aware of those who spend their entire lives in pursuit of their passion, people who have overcome great difficulties just to be where they are today, anonymous, yet equally powerful testaments of the good that comes about when people do care.

There are those who call for greater passion for our youths, and there are those who have become flag-bearers of passion. Yet, for the passion to arise, there must be inspiration, reflection, contemplation and action, all of which are badly needed in our youths.

There are many paths to many futures, and the future of Singapore society will rest in the minds of our youths, more so than anything else.

———————

About the author:

Eddie Choo is currently serving his national service.

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Current Affairs

Ng Eng Hen: Dust clouds likely caused armoured vehicle collision during Exercise Wallaby

Dust clouds limiting visibility likely contributed to the collision between two Hunter vehicles during Exercise Wallaby, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen explained in his parliamentary reply. 12 servicemen sustained mild injuries, but safety measures prevented more serious outcomes. A formal investigation is ongoing to ensure further safety improvements.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Low visibility caused by dust clouds was identified as the likely cause of the collision between two Hunter armoured fighting vehicles (AFVs) during Exercise Wallaby last month, Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen said in a written parliamentary response on Tuesday (15 October).

The incident, which occurred in Queensland, Australia, on 24 September 2024, resulted in mild injuries to 12 servicemen.

Dr Ng’s statement was in response to a parliamentary question from Mr Dennis Tan, Workers’ Party Member of Parliament for Hougang SMC.

Mr Tan asked for details on the accident, specifically its cause and whether any lessons could be applied to enhance training and operational safety within the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF).

The collision took place during a night-time movement of Hunter AFVs at the Shoalwater Bay Training Area.

The vehicles were returning to base when one rear-ended another. Dr Ng explained that the dust clouds generated by the AFVs’ movement significantly impaired visibility, might likely contributing to the accident.

The 12 affected servicemen sustained mild injuries and were promptly taken to the nearest medical facility.

None of the injuries required hospitalisation, and all 12 servicemen were able to rejoin their units for training the next day.

According to the minister, adherence to safety protocols—such as wearing seat belts and protective gear—played a crucial role in limiting the injuries to mild ones.

Following the incident, a safety pause was immediately implemented, with all drivers being reminded to maintain proper safety distances, especially when visibility was compromised.

Troops were also reminded to adhere strictly to safety protocols, including the proper use of safety equipment, Dr Ng added.

The safety lessons from the incident were shared not only with the affected units but also with other participating groups in the exercise, as well as units back in Singapore, through dedicated safety briefings.

Mr Tan also asked about the broader implications of the incident. In his response, Dr Ng said that a formal investigation had been launched in accordance with SAF’s safety incident protocol.

The investigation aims to assess the circumstances more thoroughly and identify any further measures that could be taken to enhance safety.

Dr Ng shared that recommendations arising from the investigation will be implemented where necessary.

Exercise Wallaby is SAF’s largest unilateral overseas exercise, and the 2024 edition began on 8 September, running until 3 November.

The exercise involves approximately 6,200 personnel, including 500 operationally ready national servicemen.

The exercise has been conducted at Shoalwater Bay Training Area in Queensland since 1990, and it is a key part of SAF’s overseas training program.

The Hunter AFV, one of the vehicles involved in the collision, is a state-of-the-art platform jointly developed by the Defence Science and Technology Agency, the Singapore Army, and ST Engineering.

It replaced the SAF’s aging fleet of Ultra M113 AFVs in 2019, which had been in service since the 1970s. The Hunter is equipped with advanced features, including a 30mm cannon, a 76mm smoke grenade launcher, and an automatic target detection and

tracking system designed to enhance operational effectiveness. It is also capable of traveling at increased speeds and covering longer distances, making it a versatile asset for the SAF.

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Government to “carefully consider” Lee Hsien Yang’s demolition application for 38 Oxley Road

The Singapore Government will “carefully consider” Mr Lee Hsien Yang (LHY)’s application to demolish the house at 38 Oxley Road. LHY announced his intent on Tuesday morning following the recent death of his sister, Dr Lee Wei Ling, reaffirming his commitment to honour his parents’ wish for the house’s demolition.

Published

on

The Singapore Government has indicated that it will “carefully consider” Mr Lee Hsien Yang’s (LHY) application to demolish the family home at 38 Oxley Road.

LHY, the youngest son of Singapore’s founding Prime Minister, the late Lee Kuan Yew (LKY), announced his intention to apply for the demolition in a Facebook post on 15 October 2024, following the death of his sister, Dr Lee Wei Ling, on 9 October.

The announcement marks a significant development in the ongoing saga over the fate of the historically significant property, which has been at the heart of a family dispute since LKY’s passing in 2015.

In his will, executed in December 2013, LKY expressed his desire for the house to be demolished “immediately after” Dr Lee moved out of the property. Dr Lee, a prominent neurologist, had been the last remaining resident of the house.

LHY reaffirmed his commitment to carrying out his father’s wishes, stating, “After my sister’s passing, I am the only living executor of my father’s estate. It is my duty to carry out his wishes to the fullest extent of the law.”

He added that he would seek to build a small private dwelling on the site, which would be “held within the family in perpetuity”.

LHY also referenced his brother, Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (LHL) remarks in Parliament in 2015, when he was Prime Minister, stating that upon Dr Lee’s passing, the decision to demolish the house would rest with the “Government of the day.”

In response to media queries regarding LHY’s announcement, a spokesperson for the Ministry of National Development (MND) acknowledged the intended application and emphasised that the Government would “carefully consider issues related to the property in due course”.

The spokesperson also highlighted that any decision would need to balance LKY’s wishes, public interest, and the historical value of the house.

The house at 38 Oxley Road, where key decisions about Singapore’s path to independence were made, has been a focal point of public and political discussion.

The future of the house became contentious in 2017 when LHY and Dr Lee publicly accused their elder brother, LHL, of trying to preserve the house against their father’s wishes for political reasons.

LHL denied the accusations, issuing a Ministerial Statement in Parliament, where he also raised concerns over the preparation of their father’s final will. He clarified that he had recused himself from all decisions regarding the property and affirmed that any government action would be impartial.

In 2018, a “secret” ministerial committee, which was formed in 2016 to study the future of 38 Oxley Road, proposed three options: preserving the property and designating it as a national monument, partially demolishing the house while retaining the historically significant basement dining room, or allowing complete demolition for redevelopment. LHL accepted the committee’s conclusions but stated that no immediate decision was necessary, as Dr Lee was still living in the house.

In a statement conveyed by LHY on behalf of Dr Lee after her passing, she reiterated her strong support for her father’s wish to demolish the house. “My father, Lee Kuan Yew, and my mother, Kwa Geok Choo, had an unwavering and deeply felt wish for their house at 38 Oxley Road to be demolished upon the last parent’s death,” the statement read.

She added, “He had also appealed directly to the people of Singapore. Please honour my father by honouring his wish for his home to be demolished.”

Despite selling the house to LHY at market value in 2015, LHL’s stance regarding the house’s preservation became a public issue, especially after the family disclosed that the Government had raised concerns about reinstating the demolition clause in the 2013 will. The ministerial committee had reviewed the matter, but a final decision was deferred until now.

The fate of 38 Oxley Road remains to be seen, but the Government’s decision will likely have lasting implications for the legacy of the Lee family and the conservation of Singapore’s historical landmarks.

Continue Reading

Trending