Workers’ Party (WP) Member of Parliament (MP) Dennis Tan condemned the People’s Action Party (PAP) for its “petty and bad politics” during the last General Election, highlighting how the ruling party had made complaints about WP’s placement of posters in Hougang Single Member Constituency (SMC).

He also mentioned about how the incumbent had placed its own flags in front of WP’s banner in Hougang.

Mr Tan made these comments on Monday (31 August) when MPs debated the President’s Address during the first day of parliamentary debates.

In his speech, the MP of Hougang shared his experience in July’s GE2020, in response to President Halimah Yacob’s point of politics evolution in Singapore.

“I myself had some experience with petty and bad politics in this election, which makes me wonder whether the ruling party had gone backwards in time in the way its campaign has been conducted in Hougang,” Mr Tan noted.

In GE2020, WP managed to secure its strong position in Hougang SMC after winning 61.19 per cent of the vote against PAP’s Lee Hong Chuang.

While delivering his speech, Mr Tan, who took over the WP’s Png Eng Huat in Hougang, pointed out that two complaints were made to the Elections Department (ELD) during the campaigning period.

The first complaint was about 13 allegations of the alternative party’s election posters being below the required 2.2m height. To this, Mr Tan said his volunteers were “puzzled” to learn about this complaint as they had properly followed ELD’s regulations.

Another complaint with similar allegations was again made just two days later, even though his volunteers had fixed the issue, Mr Tan added.

If that’s not all, a resident also told him that representative from PAP were seen pulling WP’s posters to ensure that they fall below its original height.

Mr Tan went on to state that the PAP had also place its own flags in front of WP’s banner in the constituency, “blocking a clean sighting of the content” of his banners. The ruling party also planted many of its flags around coffee shops in Hougang, Mr Tan added.

As such, he asked if PAP’s actions in the involved consistency give WP the leave to do the same in constituencies where PAP was incumbent.

“I should think not, lest a tit-for-tat culture manifests itself and creates a divisive political culture that only hurts Singaporeans,” Mr Tan said.

Murali Pillai heated response to Mr Tan

Mr Tan’s comments resulted in a heated exchange with PAP’s Murali Pillai, who asked Mr Tan if he felt that the incumbent was using its “power of incumbency” against oppositions in an unfair manner.

The MP for Bukit Batok also questioned if Mr Tan would agree that ELD had addressed his complaints in “an even-handed way”.

As a reply, Mr Tan went on to restate the multiple events that he encountered. He specifically highlighted the issue of PAP flags being placed around Hougang coffee shops, in which he said this was something that he would not have expected to happen when he was competing against PAP in Fengshan SMC in GE2015.

During that election, Mr Tan lost to PAP’s Cheryl Chan.

“My point is that… if this is going to be a precedent set by the PAP… then it raises the question of where do you want to draw the line with this kind of behaviour, because certainly for me, we have to move beyond this,” Mr Tan said.

Given that Mr Tan did not directly answer the question that was raised by Mr Pillai, Speaker of Parliament Tan Chuan-Jin urged the WP MP to answer Mr Pillai’s question directly.

As such, Mr Tan agreed that ELD was even-handed in dealing with the complaints.

Stating that Mr Tan did not address his questions properly, Mr Pillai stood up and repeated his question and Mr Tan responded then by saying, “I’m not suggesting the PAP is using its power of incumbency. But I have raised various incidents that have happened as a result of the actions of certain people.”

He added, “My point really is that these are all very petty and bad politics and we shouldn’t encourage it.”

ELD’s response

Responding to media queries on the parliamentary debate, ELD said on Monday that it got over 220 feedback and complaints from the public and political parties about posters and banners put up by candidates and political parties in GE2020.

Some of the breaches include posters and banners planted within 50m of a polling station, not in possession of the Returning Officer’s stamp and below the 2.2m height requirement, as it will block the line of sight for motorists.

ELD said that regardless of political party, the Department will ask election agent to rectify the posters in breach of the rules within three hours, when such complaints are made.

“If this is done, no further action will be taken. In most cases, rectifications were done within the three-hour timeframe and no further action was taken,” it said.

It added, “This was also the case for the complaints relating to Mr Dennis Tan’s posters.”

ELD also noted that Mr Tan’s comment of his posters being pulled down from the original height is “a serious allegation”, adding that it had not received such a report.

“Mr (Dennis) Tan should file a report with ELD so that this can be investigated,” ELD stated.

Subscribe
Notify of
14 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【藐视法庭诉讼】总检察署要求判罚李绳武1.5万元

因为2017年7月的一则脸书贴文,批评我国政府“好诉讼” (ligitious),法庭制度“温顺” (pliant),李显扬之子李绳武,遭总检察署起诉藐视法庭。案件今早开审,总检察署要求高庭判处李绳武1万5000元的罚款。若不缴交罚款,就必须以两周监禁代替。 受理此案的高庭法官加南拉美斯称,他需时斟酌,案件展期至日后下判。李绳武今日没到高庭。早前李绳武已表示不会再继续参与诉讼。 政府律师指责今年2月至月,总检察署多次以电邮和邮件到他在美国哈佛大学的住处,要求他今早出庭。 尽管早前李绳武已说明,有关贴文只是设定为只供朋友圈浏览,不公开大众阅读,却还是引来三大媒体和总检察署的注意,令他对新加坡政府琐事必究的程度感到惊讶。 而政府律师却指责,李绳武没在贴文里要求脸书朋友不要转发、也不肯揭露自己的脸书朋友圈有多少人,“似乎有隐瞒”;政府律师也指李沉浸于李光耀孙子光环,接受外媒采访,却诋毁祖父守护的司法制度。

PM Lee visits girl who had her right hand crushed

Post by Lee Hsien Loong. Injured 14-year-old Tan Li Xuan, who had…

MP Pritam Singh visits Eunos to monitor rodent issue following an increase of burrows and rat sightings in the area

Aljunied GRC Member of Parliament (MP) and Workers’ Party chief Pritam Singh…

MOE disputes Prof Koh’s claims on student poverty

“We know of no study that substantiates this, nor does our teachers’…