Source: Workers’ Party Facebook

Most Generation Z voters stamped for the Workers’ Party (WP) on Polling Day, while discontented former voters of the ruling party, the People’s Action Party (PAP), swung to the Progress Singapore Party (PSP). 

Voters aged 21 – 25 favoured WP the most, while a majority of the demographic aged between 25 – 59 voted for PSP. 

These survey findings of voter intentions were released by the Blackbox Research on Thursday (16 Jul). 

The PAP garnered most votes from those aged 60 and above. They won the General Election (GE) on 10 July with 61.2 per cent of the popular vote share, a drop of almost nine points form GE 2015. 

GE 2020 was hailed as a ‘watershed’ election – a turning point in history or development that represents the beginning of a new stage of it. 

But how much of this watershed was due to the maturity of political consciousness of younger voters, or the coming of age of a new generation of young voters with their pertinacious set of needs and wants? 

Old Age Paternalistic Politics Paling Against a New Age Political Backdrop 

Ambassador-at-Large Chan Heng Chee said younger voters in Singapore, the Millennials, support diversity in Parliament and democracy in governance. 

Millennials are those born between 1981 and 1996 (24 – 39 years old in 2020).  

“Those aged between 25 and 35 (formed) the biggest bulge in its population pyramid in 2020,” said Prof Chan, a fellow with the Institute of Policy Studies by the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, at the National University of Singapore.

A poll of voters by the Blackbox Research showed that 47 per cent of 742 respondents aligned themselves with the statement that “Singaporeans should not be giving the PAP a blank cheque”.

The findings were published after 1 July – the day of the broadcasted political debate. Jamus Lim, from the WP, was the one who made that comment.

“Clearly, (the Millennials) bought the opposition message of the need for diverse voices in Parliament and the need for checks and balances,” she said. 

Former Member of Parliament (MP) Inderjit Singh said in a Facebook post on 12 July that millennials were the group who most likely voted against the PAP, and that more than half of young voters had cast their votes for the opposition.

In a post-results press-conference on 11 July, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong acknowledged the message from the polls that younger voters wanted to see more “opposition presence” in Parliament. 

Other surveys by the Straits Times found that young voters leaned towards the opposition due to their manifesto policies – such as the reduction in immigration. 

“They will have specific personal concerns, too, in different phases of their lives. The incumbent party will have to understand this group better to win back their vote,” Prof Chan stressed. 

Although there is a preconceived notion that one gets more conservative in political views with age, she found that millennials in Singapore have already shown a “distinct and increasingly liberal outlook”.

“I expect our millennials will continue to support diverse voices and an opposition in Parliament as a good thing even as they age,” she opined. 

On top of Millennials, Generation X voters born between 1965 and 1980 also swung in favour of PSP in the election. 

These voters would be between 40 and 55 years old this year. 

“PSP was most popular among those aged 25-59, which caused the biggest vote shift,” the survey found. 

When the Online Citizen Asia reached out to PSP for comments, a spokesperson said PSP’s “messages and stand resonated with (this demographic)” because “the younger generation is looking for change, a more level playing field, and free contest of ideas through constructive and rigorous debates without gutter politics”. 

“We believe it is a combination of both push and pull factors that caused the swing,” the spokesperson added when asked if these voters were drawn more to PSP manifestos, or pushed away more by the PAP’s governance over the years. 

In WP’s last political broadcast on 9 July, chairwoman Sylvia Lim echoed the same sentiments. 

She said one of the push factors was an appetite among Singaporeans for a more conscious government, where “diverse voices are listened to and really heard, and government policies are not pre-decided and bulldozed through”.

Ms Lim asked the voters to “imagine a Singapore where the huge power imbalance that now exists with the government dominating and controlling the people is changed – and power shifts back towards our citizens”. 

Elvin Ong, post-doctoral fellow at the School of Public Policy and Global Affairs, University of British Columbia, affirmed this on 11 July when he noted “a significant proportion are looking for a more inclusive style of politics”. 

“Voters did not succumb to the PAP’s tactics of intimidation and fear mongering. The result also reflects the changing political landscape in Singapore – that the support for the PAP is waning and unless some serious leadership rejuvenation is in place, it might see its winning margin reduced even further in the next one to two elections,” Felix Tan, associate lecturer at SIM Global Education, said. 

Zoomer Generation as First-Time Voters

Prof Chan said that the younger generation, which she called the “Zoomer generation (Gen Z)”, prefers “personal narratives and ‘I feel your pain’ connectivity, approachability and authenticity”.

Gen Z consists of people born from 1997 onwards (voters aged 21 – 23 in 2020) 

“WP understood this and chose youthful candidates and issues for the Zoomer generation. This online digital politics is now the new retail politics – up close and personal.”

Policies should be implemented with a “human touch”, she added. 

Prof Chan considered it a “very cold implementation of policy” when politicians are too bureaucratic, preoccupied with red tapes and conscientious in being politically correct. 

“It goes to the ground. We should do it intelligently with a feel of the ground,” she added. 

Law and Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam seemingly echoed this. He said on 11 July that a new framework is needed to take into account how young people feel about the way certain things are discussed. 

Issues like race relations must go “beyond the traditional”, he stated. 

One such Gen Z first-time voter, marketing executive Callista Khoo, 22, recalled WP Marine Parade Group-Representation Constituency (GRC) candidate Fadli Fawzi reciting a Malay poem which urged his audience to “light the fires in your will”.

Views that Mr Fadli’s further expressed on his Twitter account won Ms Khoo over. 

His personableness made her vote for WP “because they deserve a chance for more voices in Parliament”. 

“How else will voters make an informed decision about credibility if the opposition lacks the equivalent of the PAP’s opportunities and platforms to prove themselves?”

Gerald Sim, another Gen Z first-time voter at 23, said he found the PAP’s tactic of demanding WP to state its position on Sengkang GRC candidate Raeesah Khan’s Facebook posts distasteful. 

“It undermines my trust in the incumbent party even more when it resorts to delivering low blows (like this) – it’s a show of political mudslinging,” he commented. 

Young voters perceive the PAP’s politicking as both underhanded and high-handed. 

Singaporeans seem to be “repulsed” by the competitive, mean politics of some Western democracies, Prof Chan said. 

She claimed that educated and younger Singaporeans in particular “do not want to see political overkill”.

Subscribe
Notify of
3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【选举】IHH收购印度医疗机构受阻 惟前总裁陈诗龙荣休今年参选

人民行动党上周在线上介绍了27名新面孔,其中一人是55岁的IHH医疗保健集团管理层的前总裁兼董事经理,陈诗龙医生。令人感到疑惑的是,在他离职时,IHH正面对收购印度医疗机构富通的交易纠纷,而他似乎没选择留下来提供协助。 陈诗龙于2014年1月至2019年12月在IHH任职。然而在他去年合约结束,选择退休。 IHH医疗保健集团在我国、马来西亚、中国、土耳其和印度都有业务,也是我国和马来西亚的上市公司。其旗下的百汇班台(Parkway Pantai Ltd)更是集团的御宝,在亚洲拥有医院网络,包括我国的伊丽莎白医院、伊丽莎白诺维娜医院、鹰阁医院和百汇东岸医院。 行动党委派陈诗龙医生出战马林百列集选区,直接对垒工人党。 IHH在印度收购富通受阻 IHH医疗保健公司在2018年7月,成功赢得收购印度第二大医院经营机构-富通保健股权的竞标战,并于同年11月通过优先配股购买31.1巴仙股权,还打算随后收购额外的26巴仙股权。但是日本制药公司第一三共株式会社(Daiichi Sankyo)和富通保健的创办人辛格兄弟对簿公堂,因此印度最高法院下令IHH暂缓收购交易。辛格兄弟当时也接受印度当局的欺诈调查。 在2019年11月15日,印度法院裁定富通保健前持有人,辛格兄弟和富通藐视法庭罪名成立,也表示或对当时已经由IHH掌控的富通公司展开藐视法庭审讯。这是因为法院指IHH和富通的部分交易,被视为违反了2018年12月的庭令。 法院当时曾对双方部分交易展开调查,甚至调查富通董事会和管理层的详情,发现相关交易都是非常仓促和秘密在进行,进而违反了2018年所发出的庭令。 印度当局下令调查富通…

China starts prosecution of Hong Kong ‘speedboat fugitives’

Chinese authorities said Wednesday they were starting the prosecution of 12 Hong…

Why Amos Yee was convicted: Court judgment on obscenity law explained

By Carlton Tan Amos Yee Pang Sang was found guilty on 12…

GE 2011: ST Forum writers turn Opposition ‘advisers’

by Andrew Loh Strange how the mainstream media is flushed with letters…