Source: TODAY

Co-founder of ReadAble Michelle MoMo Yeo took to her Facebook to highlight that no matter how hard underprivileged children try, they cannot “catch up” in their education and score well in their PSLE examination as compared to kids from a rich background.

The post was originally published in November 2018 but the comments from netizens started picking up once again now.

In her post, Ms Yeo said that she attended a dialogue session with ministers at a screening of Channel NewsAsia’s (CNA) documentary video titled ‘Regardless of Class’. During the dialogue session, she told Minister in the Prime Minister’s Office and Second Minister for Finance Indranee Rajah that “by and large, the children that we work with at ReadAble – no matter how much time and effort we devote to them as volunteers – we never catch up with a child born into a privileged family”.

ReadAble is a project that teaches underprivileged children on how to read.

Upon hearing Ms Yeo’s statement, Senior Minister of State for Transport Janil Puthucheary jumped in to state that he disagrees with Ms Yeo’s point that children at ReadAble are unable to “catch up” with those kids born into privileged family.

“He said (I’m paraphrasing a little here) that this reflected a narrow definition of success, and that the kids we work with can go on to succeed by a different metric, and that he for one Does Not Define Children By Their PSLE Scores,” she wrote.

However, Ms Yeo clearly disagrees with what Dr Janil said.

In her post, she attached the PSLE result slip of one of ReadAble’s students who scored C and D for English and Malay, respectively.

Ms Yeo said that she is extremely proud of this student because when they first met, the student only scored anything ranging from single digits to the high 30s in her primary 2 Grade. She could not even complete one written sentence in her English worksheet, Ms Yeo said.

However, in the end, the student managed to pass her PSLE, in which the student felt extremely happy.

“Yet this score, to me, represents a chasm between worlds. In one world, parents work unreasonable hours to keep their child fed. The lucky ones have no parents in jail, no fear of police authorities visiting their houses unexpectedly, no gangs recruiting them in late childhood,” she wrote.

She added, “In this world, it takes four years of dedicated volunteers working with a child, both on the weekends and during the week, on every single school subject; tears (for everyone really), arguments, exhaustion, nights of lying in bed asking whether we’re wasting our time, family and volunteer conferences – all for a passing grade in the PSLE. And in this world, passing the PSLE is a dream.”

“But, the situation is completely different for another group of students who are born into a more financially stable family where they have plenty of “money, relative familial stability, expectations and aspirations”, Ms Yeo expressed.

“It populates our society with its government leaders, civil servants and local and overseas professionals. In this world, most kids score at least a hundred marks more than this in the PSLE, and are disappointed that they didn’t achieve more,” she explained.

Additionally, Ms Yeo also said that people coming from this group are a lot luckier when it comes to securing better career and educational options. However, that’s not same case for those underprivileged individuals.

“In adulthood, they find themselves limited to unenviable, often low-paying, high-labour jobs. Some may find that crime pays better – and who are we to judge them when the incentives simply line up that way – perpetuating the stressors that so greatly affected them when they were children themselves,” she noted.

As such, the educator said that it’s time to now think what the PSLE score gap really means and how that affects the students’ lives when they become adults.

“The cycle is real. The aspirational gap is real. And maybe it’s time to start thinking about what the PSLE score gap represents, what societal sickness it symptomises, and quit glibly dismissing academic underachievement and its consequences on those without means.”

Netizens agree on the existence of a class divide in education

Upon reading her post, some netizens pointed out the irony of Dr Janil stating that success can be measured by a different metric and not solely on test results, given that he himself comes from a privileged family. They added that elite policymakers don’t understand the real situation among the people, and their “view of equal opportunity will be coloured” by their privileged background.

Jamie Lim said that it is “disingenuous of him (Dr Janil) to play down the importance of the PSLE and talk about ‘other successes’ when the entire educational and workforce systems are rigged to favour the academically successful”.

A bunch of other online users thanked Ms Yeo for her thoughts and penned their support towards her. They also thanked her for speaking up about this issue.

Facebook user Teh Garett said that he knows parents who are not well-versed in English and had to spend extra two years in Primary school. As such, he said that if the parents were rich, they could have engaged a private tutor for themselves, emphasising that Dr Janil’s argument is wrong in this case.

On the other hand, Denis Shalashov pointed out a year ago – when the post was first published – that it’s not right or beneficial for the society to deprive someone from a poor background education and creating situation in which they may not succeed. “Every kid should have a chance, especially if society is rich enough to afford it. Opposite is not only cruel, but also unwise and bitter fruits of this shall be harvested later.”

Separately, Ray Tan, who is a teacher himself, said that he fully agrees with Ms Yeo on the class divide in Singapore. He said, “Yes, they will never have the same starting lines as those who dwell in premium districts like Bukit Timah; they will learn invaluable values like resilience, self-reliance and empathy.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

191 new cases of COVID-19 infection in S’pore; 187 locally transmitted cases, 113 unlinked

As of Thursday noon (2 Sep), the Ministry of Health (MOH) has…

四党到宏茂桥拜早年 吴明盛称联盟“麻雀虽小五脏俱全”

昨日(19日),人民力量党(PPP)、国人为先党(SingFirst)、革新党(RP)和民主进步党(PPP)。一同前往宏茂桥市镇中心展开首次联合走访活动,并向当地民众拜早年、派芦柑。 上述四党曾传出计划结盟迎战选举,也邀请由陈清木医生领导的前进党加入。不过后者早前已表示目前比较倾向较松散的联盟。 据《海峡时报》报导,国人为先党党魁陈如斯表示目前四党仍待注册联盟,并指仍在观察和收集反馈,且目前反应不一,目前持续与其他政党洽谈。 早前,前进党中委陈仲熙,因为揶揄四在野党组盟如“抱团防沉船”的言论而引来挞伐。对此陈清木在上周五受访时重申,前者意见不代表他的观点,也不代表前进党。 他也不认为陈仲熙言论会对该党造成负面影响,“我想一些小波折不必担心太多”,他认为政治上难免会有风波,不必被它们弄得太紧绷。 “你必须看大局,大局就是… 同仇敌忾。” 冀陈清木瓜分执政党选票 据了解,陈如斯在昨日受访时告知记者,反对党目前已有三到四成的基本盘,希望陈清木能在来届选举帮忙瓜分执政党选票,但不是在野党的。 人民力量党秘秘书长吴明盛则告知记者,他们虽是小船但肯定没有沉船,也以“麻雀虽小五脏俱全”来形容四党联盟。 对于陈清木“松散联盟”的建议,他认为在野党应有共同的政策平台,例如在2011年大家群起围攻组屋价格资产增值(asset enhancement)议题;但是相对下在2015年选举,各党攻打不同议题,致使反对党得票率跌至30.1巴仙。

ST opinion says Ah Seng is not ungrateful just for disagreeing with the Government, and netizens couldn’t agree more

In a typical Parliamentary session, Hokkien is hardly uttered, but when Nee…

Netizens say low pay reason behind why locals don’t apply as cleaners despite shortage in Singapore

After the Government announced that more employees in Singapore will be permitted…