Aljunied GRC Member of Parliament (MP) and Workers’ Party chief Pritam Singh took to his Facebook on Tuesday (24 September) to address the issue of climate change by stating that Singapore can “play a significant role” in it.
He started his post by highlighting some of the events that took place last weekend, which include the successful Formula One race despite the sky being enveloped by haze as well as protest at Hong Lim Park “in solidarity with a worldwide movement on climate action, which some countries have labelled as a youth-led climate strike”.
Mr Singh stressed that although Singapore has a small population and its climate footprint would probably not make a huge impact globally, but it’s important to note that the city-state is not an irrelevant player in this issue and it “can play a significant role to alter corporate behaviour worldwide”.

Importance of transparency and accountability

Opining that transparency and accountability are crucial elements needed to tackle climate crisis, Mr Singh cited the website of Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund (NSWF) which manages fund in excess of $1 trillion.
He said that the website openly states what the Norwegian government does with its fund and adjust it based on climate issues. As oppose to Singapore, this “level of public accountability and transparency of the fund is incredible”, said the MP.
“Not only does the Norwegian taxpayer know which country and foreign companies their reserves are invested in – including the size of shareholding, with just a few clicks of the mouse – they also know how the Norwegian SWF, as a shareholder in over 9000 companies across the globe, votes in the board meetings of the companies it invests in,” Mr Singh wrote.
He continued, “To this end, the Norwegian fund makes environmental sustainability a central feature of its investment mandate – publicly adjusting its portfolio through divestments and actively considering climate issues in investments”.
Besides that, in 2016, the Norwegian SWF announced that it had dropped 11 companies in 2015 due to the companies’ high rates of deforestation and harm to the environment. Specifically, the companies dropped include 6 firms in the palm oil industry, 4 pulp and paper companies, and 1 coal company.
The NSWF’s divesting of these 11 companies makes it clear that causing deforestation gives rise to severe consequences for companies as they risk such exclusions from international investment, said the head of the NGO Rainforest Foundation Norway, Lars Løvold.
This move is also an indication that Norway’s SWF is willing to make do with the potential losses associated with the divestments, with the view that the prevention of the loss of forests holds greater importance than profits.
On the other hand, Mr Singh noted in his Facebook post that Singapore’s sovereign wealth funds are huge, but the extent in which the country invest in sustainability is unknown as it’s not transparent.
“Our SWFs, in particular Temasek, have made sustainability an investment consideration, but the extent to which it, and the other Singaporean sovereign wealth behemoth, GIC does so is not known, partly because the fund, its size, amongst other things, is not totally transparent,” he explained.

GIC and Temasek’s investments in haze-linked companies

Additionally, Mr Singh along with WP’s NCMP Leon Perera, asked in Parliament last month for the National Environment Agency’s (NEA) “life-cycle assessment study on plastic carrier bags and food packaging to be made publicly”.
However, he pointed out that the Straits Times “erroneously reported that this study was in the public domain”. As such, Mr Singh said that his Party will file a parliamentary question at the next parliamentary sitting asking for this document to be made public.
This is not the first time WP has raised questions regarding climate crisis in the Parliament. Over three years ago, Mr Perera asked Finance Minister Heng Swee Keat if the Government was involved in monitoring GIC and Temasek’s investments so as to ensure that neither were investing in haze-linked companies – and if they were, how much did GIC and Temasek invest in said companies. He also asked Heng as to how GIC and Temasek will ensure that the funds invested will not contribute to activities that cause haze.
In a written reply to Mr Perera on 28 Jan 2016, Mr Heng said that while the Government oversees the performance of GIC and Temasek’s overall portfolio, their respective management teams are responsible for observing the two companies’ individual investments in particular.
Mr Heng added that the investments of GIC and Temasek are geared for “long-term returns on a sustainable basis”, and that investing in companies with “environmentally unsustainable practices” such as those involved in open burning for land clearance “could negatively impact the commercial value of the investments over the long term”.

Is Singapore’s Transboundary Haze Pollution Act really working?

Separately, The Straits Times reported Indonesia’s Environment and Forestry Minister Siti Nurbaya Bakar as saying at a climate change event in Jakarta three years ago that Singapore’s Transboundary Haze Pollution Act (THPA) is a hotly debated and “controversial” law among officials from Asean states, particularly those affected by the haze such as Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei and even Indonesia itself.
Singapore, added Siti, should not step into Indonesia’s legal domain on the issue of forest fires as “there was never a bilateral agreement between Indonesia and Singapore”, adding that the Asean agreement on transboundary haze pollution is a “multilateral” one.
Then-Minister for the Environment and Water Resources Vivian Balakrishnan told Parliament in Aug 2014 – two months after Siti’s comments – that while “States have a sovereign right to exploit their own natural resources pursuant to their own policies” under the principles of international law, they “also have a responsibility to ensure that the activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to the environment of other States or areas beyond the limits of national jurisdiction”.
He added: “We, in Singapore, cannot simply wait and wishfully hope that the problem will be resolved on its own. The Singapore Government would want to send a strong signal that we will not tolerate the actions of errant companies that harm our environment and put at risk the health of our citizens”.
Under THPA, companies involved in activities – such as open burning – outside Singapore that result in haze spreading to the Republic can be fined up to S$100,000 per day of haze pollution linked to said activities, or to a total maximum aggregate of S$2 million. In addition, the Act also creates statutory duties and civil liabilities that companies must abide by, failing which the companies may face lawsuits.
However, it can be theorised that the problems in applying THPA are largely due to the principle of extra-territoriality and the Asean agreement taking precedence, given that THPA is still, in essence, a domestic law that was drafted and passed by the Singapore Parliament alone, and not a bilateral agreement as the Indonesian Environment Minister had argued.

Facts needed to tackle climate change

In the end of Mr Singh’s post, he said that with the existence of fake news and opinions deemed as facts, especially when it comes to climate science, the politician said that “facts must drive the conversation on climate change and sustainability”.
“And that conversation must start with accountability, not just from government that turn a blind eye to climate change, but from large corporates and the financial ecosystem that invests in them,” he elaborated.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Bukit Brown crossroad – a viable alternative

~ By Goh Si Gium ~ With the increased population in Singapore,…

【马国政坛】今觐见国家元首 安华呈120议员支持文件

马来西亚公正党主席安华,今早(13日)成功觐见国家元首。他也重申现任马国首相慕尤丁已失去多数议员支持。 他在今午告知媒体,他向元首提呈一份获得逾120国会议员支持的文件。不过,国家元首仍需依照宪法行事,需研究他提呈的文件,并召见其他政党党魁,以了解实际情况。 相信此举乃是国家元首有意核实安华所获支持是否属实。安华则呼吁,这段期间应给元首一些空间讨论和研究此事。 另一方面,有传巫统元老东姑拉沙里( Tengku Razaleigh),今午也将觐见马国元首;至于目前属在野党的民主行动党秘书林冠英,诚信党主席莫哈末沙布,也将分别在明日和周四会见国家元首。 尽管上月23日,安华已宣布掌握多数议席,但碍于国家元首前往治疗,觐见事宜因此被搁置至今。 不过,国家王宫也随即发文告,指出安华只是提成了支持议员的人数,但未有更为具体的议员名单加强证明。 国家王宫总管拿督阿末法迪发文告指今日安华与国家元首会面25分钟,尽管安华提交支持议员的人数,但未提呈议员名单。 为此,国家元首苏丹阿都拉劝告安华,应遵从和尊重宪法所规定的法律程序。 Posted by…

Calling out for Male Volunteers from AWARE for theatre production

Calling Male Volunteers for Forum Theatre! AWARE is collaborating with Drama Box to produce its…

分享购物理念善用住家空间 Nas“炫住宅”引网民争议

从3月份决定定居“近乎完美”的新加坡,到商议定居住宿,再到分享透过”登山实验”来决定购物所需,著名网络旅游博客亚新(Nas Daily)一直是个话题人物。这次她分享到和住家空间有关的课题,却有些“炫富惹人眼红”的情况出现。 现年27岁的亚新,于上周五在其脸书上载了一个名为“旅行教你的东西”的视频,并写道“旅游有很多好处,但是这个……是最酷的。我发现减少衣服是最有效的减少杂乱方式。所以我拿走了整个衣柜,只放了我一直穿的一种T恤类型。我强烈推荐这种方式。” 他也欢迎人们到他的官方网站shop.nasdaily.com购买有关的T恤,但是他要求购买者必须抛出至少5件衣服,或者在购买前考虑5次。 登山实验决定购物选择 视频中分享了他在新加坡的住宅内容,表示连续了三年的旅游生活,终于有了一个居所,拥有了比以前都多的“空间”。 他指出,之前存放生活物品的空间,都必须通过登山实验来决定,所以其实只有一个背包的大小。他表示这样能够方便他旅行,背包中只装了10天分量的内裤和衣服。 “但是有了屋子后,你的空间就很大了,就会想要买很多东西。在我们还没有意识到的时候,屋子的空间就会被充满了,生活也变得杂乱了” 他指出,这也导致旅行时要带在身上的东西变多了,更别提能够成功通过登山实验。 “因此对我来说,长期旅行是我生命中发生最好的事情,它告诉我购物时必须谨慎、我们生活并不需要许多东西,以及杂乱可以自内心中开始毁了自己。” 所以在家具方面,他只买了一张床、两个枕头和家具,而在购买其他物件时,都以“登山实验”来决定。 喜悦并非来自物件…