Home Affairs and Law Minister K Shanmugam said on Wednesday that our website, The Online Citizen, employs foreigners to write almost exclusively negative articles on social and political matters in Singapore, including content that seek to ‘fracture social cohesion’.

Highlighting specifically the article that is now the subject of a lawsuit between PM Lee Hsien Loong and TOC’s editor Terry Xu, Mr Shanmugan said, “I’m not commenting on the legal merits of the article, since it is the subject of a lawsuit, only that a foreigner, staying in Malaysia, writes these things for a Singapore site to target a Singapore audience.”

He went on: “Who controls her? Who pays her? What is her purpose? All these are legitimate questions. most readers would just assume this was by a genuine Singaporean contributor.”

Mr Shanmugan was speaking at a one-day conference on Foreign Interference Tactics and Countermeasures organised by the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University.

In his speech, Mr Shanmugan also questioned the administrators of TOC, saying that nine out of 14 are located outside of Singapore. “We don’t know who they are. Are they Singaporeans? Are they foreigners?”

He also talked about how “some news sites” have anonymous contributors, which leaves them open to being used by foreign interests to publish inflammatory articles that “attack and deepen divisions” within a country.

“They have no interest in sociopolitical stability within a country,” he said.

“Their only interest is in eyeballs.”

Responding to Mr Shanmugam’s fiery statement, Terry asserts that all articles published on TOC are directed and subsequently approved by him as the Chief Editor.

“Nothing goes unvetted by me, a Singaporean who has served his national service and held responsible by the Ministry of Communication and Information as the registered person in charge,” said Terry.

“If one is to observe the series of Facebook posts and now, the Law Minister comments, one can easily come to a conclusion that there is a collaborated campaign to discredit TOC.”

He then went on to address the debate on hiring foreign persons, saying, “To the best of my recollection, there is no law against hiring person of foreign nationality and TOC has not used nor received any foreign funding. So what is the Law Minister barking about?”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Petition demands CIPC to promise it will grant Town Council funds to WP-held Sengkang and Aljunied GRCs

A petition has been created on Change.org to demand for a promise…

邻国前首相纳吉被指制造假文件 阿拉伯王子捐款乃是虚构

邻国前首相拿督斯里纳吉(Najib)自2015年来爆出“一马公司丑闻”,风波不断,今日开庭时,被指利用其“翻版人物”(mirror image)刘特佐,掩饰其踪迹,甚至制造假文件,以假装来自阿拉伯王子的捐款。 主控官拿督斯里哥巴斯里南高级副检察司在宣读开案陈词时指出,“被告涉及制造假文件包括声称来自阿拉伯捐款者撰写的信函与四张支票,每张支票总额为2500万美元,然而,这些支票却不打算兑现,也不曾兑现过。” 他续指,控方将提呈有利证据证明被告试图以此逃避法网,包括干涉案件调查过程、积极采取行动等来掩盖罪行,而控方会依据证据证明被告具有犯罪意图。 如今66岁的纳吉在一马公司资金案下涉及25项罪名,其中4项为滥权贪腐罪,涉及通过个人银行账户收取总额高达22亿8293万令吉(约7亿5288万新元),这些钱疑似源自一马公司。 另外,纳吉还涉及21项包括洗黑钱罪,总额高达20亿8147万令吉(约6亿8651万新元)非法收益,而这笔钱被汇入大马伊斯兰银行(AmIslamic Bank)的尾码9694银行户头。 巴斯里南指出,被告于2013年8月2日至23日期间,将高达20亿3435万令吉转至新加坡Tanore金融公司。同时,被告将约2千264万令吉的馀额,透过签发支票,缴付予4个单位和1名人士,而这些付款皆让被告受益,涉及使用非法款项 罪名。 之后,被告则关闭其尾码9694银行户头,却将1亿6243万令吉的馀额,透过两次转账,转至尾码为1880的新大马银行户头。

续国泰航空洋总裁“被辞职” 港泛民议员辞飞机师职

香港陷入“反送中”运动,而立基于香港、拥有2.7万人员工的国泰航空,因此前该航空工会曾发起罢工,引起中国民用航空局关注。后者要求国泰“参与和支持非法游行示威、暴力冲击活动。以及有过激行为人员”停职。 随后,国泰将两名分别被起诉暴动罪,和倍指不当使用企业信息的飞机师开除,另两名雇员被解雇。 而在本月16日,国泰英籍行政总裁何杲(Rupert Hogg)也宣布辞职,从19日生效。 至于在发给香港交易所的文告,国泰航空称何杲“确认呈辞是作为公司领导者,对公司近月所面对事件负责”。而何杲在一封内部邮件承认,连日来国泰饱受压力,“尤其再重要不过的中国大陆市场”,并表示国泰必须采取果断措施,重建外界对其品牌的信任。 在另一份声明中他说:“深感荣幸能于过去三年,以行政总裁的身份带领国泰航空。我对香港未来作为亚洲主要航空枢纽充满信心。我和卢家培作为公司领袖,对国泰航空在过往数星期经历的挑战,理应承担责任。” 根据《南华早报》报导,他曾在声明中指出“我们可以用较不同的方式处理吗?事后看来,答案是肯定的”,但他没有详细说明所指何事,相信是和雇员参与反修例抗争有关。 国泰主席:支持一国两制 香港国泰航空主席史乐山表示,最近所发生的事件令国泰航空对飞行安全和保安的承诺受到质疑,现在是合适时机任命新的管理团队。国泰航空全力支持香港实行基本法赋予的“一国两制”原则。 虽然英资太古集团(Swire Group)仍是国泰最大股东,但实际上中国国际航空,也持有国泰30巴仙股份。 而在本月20日,又有一名在国泰任职飞机师的香港泛民派立法议员谭文豪,宣布请辞。…

港示威者闯入立法会 林郑月娥凌晨四时开记者会

香港一批示威者昨晚近九时成功破坏立法会大楼闸门,闯入大堂。 原本香港警方在闸门另一头驻守,与示威者对峙。不过在示威者闯入前却突然撤走。而后警方在脸书发布短片,谴责示威者占据和破坏立法会,发出警告。并表示将到现场进行清场,如遇阻碍或抵抗,将采取适当武力。 昨日是香港回归中国22周年,在昨早香港政府举办22周年主权移交纪念升旗仪式,而反对《逃犯条例》修法的示威者,则发起“七一游行”,也齐聚升旗场地外游行抗议。 期间有示威者和警方再次爆发冲突。而其中一批示威者,则在下午约1时许试图冲击立法会,即便有议员在现场劝阻也不听。 没有警方驻守下,在昨晚9时成功打开闸门的示威者进入立法会会议厅,有者在墙上涂鸦,并写上“太阳花”、“释放义士”、“反送中”、“真普选”等字眼,甚至涂鸦会议厅香港区徽和历任立法会主席肖像。 在视频中可见有示威者试图把香港殖民时代旗帜覆盖在港特区区徽之上。 游行人士对占领立法会意见两极化 据了解,也有和平游行人士不认同示威者占领立法会,认为此举反而让建制派有借口谴责“反送中”抗争,让警方有借口把事件定义为“暴动”。 至于占领立法会后的示威者此后则讨论是否继续留守,最终决定在警方返回清场前撤离。原本有数位“义士”坚持留下,不过最终被示威者们劝离,因为担心“以后再见不到他们”。 https://youtu.be/6p84g3_EFqI 警方凌晨12时清场 警方在凌晨12是开始在立法会附近道路驱散示威者和投放催泪弹。不过当警方重新返回立法会时,现场只留下记者和议员,示威者们早已全数离开。…