In an attempt to discredit the financial consultant and vlogger, Leong Sze Hian who is countersuing the PM for the abuse of the process of the Court, someone called Jason Koh alleged that Leong Sze Hian stays in a landed property in Serangoon Garden and is wealthy enough to pay for his own legal fees.

This comes just after a friends and supporters of Leong Sze Hian started raising funds for his defence of the PM’s defamation suit against him and for his countersuit of PM Lee.

Mr Leong had told TOC that many people had expressed interest in contributing to his legal funds, adding that some had already contributed. Mr Leong also said he hoped to see 10,000 people contribute $1 to his legal funds.

Clearly, $10,000 won’t be nearly enough to fund both cases but Mr Leong said, “Singaporeans must let our overpaid Ministers know once and for all, that it does not pay to sue ordinary citizens for defamation. Singaporeans and their children, and their children’s children will never have to fear being sued, for exercising their rights of freedom of expression.”

Back to Jason Koh who alleged that Mr Leong can pay for his own legal fees, former NTUC CEO Tan Kin Lian shot down that rumour promptly in a Facebook posting. He said that the house Mr Leong lives in is old, not renovated, and was probably inherited from his parents.

If one has visited Leong’s house, one would be astonished at the contrast of his house with the surrounding estate. Sure, he stays in a landed property but to say that he is rich, is another totally different matter.

Netizens whole-heartedly agreed with Mr Tan’s clarification as well, supporting it with their own experiences of how owning a landed property in Singapore doesn’t automatically signal wealth.

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Line up of nine new Nominated Members of Parliament

By Howard Lee The Singapore Parliament announced on Monday a slew of…

Politics has overtaken considerations for the people, says PSP’s Dr Tan Cheng Bock

On Wednesday (24 June), Secretary-General of the Progress Singapore Party (PSP) Dr…

【就业准证薪金门槛调高】人力部要有街头智慧 对付顽劣雇主

本社报道,人力部将提高S准证和就业准证的薪金门槛,尽管这是好消息,但也引发各界的忧虑,特别是“上有政策,下有对策”,一些老练圆滑的雇主,总有方法规避这些僵化的政府政策。 例如人民党成员欧斯曼(Khan Osman Sulaiman)就表示,若不愿去限制就业准证在本地劳动市场的比例,仍是治标不治本;雇主懂得滥用、迂回就业准证薪金门槛,已是老生常谈。 一些网民担忧,一些雇主仍能透过“报大数”,同样高薪资聘请外籍人士,但与外籍雇员协商,领取较少薪资,不失为业界的“潜规则”。 应区分本地人和永久居民 人民之声成员林启超(Simon Lim),也指虽支持政府的薪金门槛提高举措,但也应将“本地人”更仔细区分。 林启超于26日在脸书上发文表示,对于政府的薪金门槛提高举措无任欢迎,但政府应该也要将“本地人”更仔细地区分,例如本国人和永久居民的区别。 “或许通过新的税赋、调整公积金缴费率,甚至某种形式的税收以此区分。” 他也提醒政府,人民之所以投票支持现任政府,旨在获得更好的保障。 “新加坡政府绝对不能忘记,它欠所有新加坡人一个最基本的保障。首先,新加坡人确实应该获得优先的就业机会,比起永久居民。”…

【武汉冠状病毒】3月9日增10起病例 裕廊SAFRA团拜晚宴跃升最大感染群

根据新加坡卫生部文告,截至本月9日中午12时,本地新增10起武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)确诊病例,其中六起与裕廊SAFRA歌唱班团拜晚宴有关联,有三起为入境病例。 这意味着上月15日在裕廊SAFRA美满楼举办的歌唱班团拜晚宴感染群,已累计36起病患,成为迄今为止最大的感染群。 今日新增的第155、156、157、158、159和第160例,都与上述感染群有关,其中还有五岁男童。 第151例是51岁男公民,与基督生命堂感染群有关,曾接触第66例和91例。他是在上月4日就出现症状,并分别在5日和15日到诊所求诊,8日和13日到义顺综合诊所。 经卫生部确认,他与1月25日的美苑通道(Mei Hwan Drive)新年聚会有关联,一度在上月22日被转介到国家传染病中心。尽管之前已康复,在昨日中午的血清测试结果,仍证实他确诊。不过该名男子已在今日出院。他住在义顺环路一带。 第152至154例相信是入境病例。第152例是65岁印尼籍人士,早在上月28日就已出现症状,本月2日到雅加达的医院求诊。本月7日他抵达新加坡,随即被转介到中央医院并在隔日确诊。 第153例相信也是入境病例,她是65岁的新加坡女公民,曾在上月25日至28日期间到过印尼。她反映期间她曾拜访过患肺炎的姐妹。本月3日她出现症状,该日和7日到蔡厝港综合诊所求医;7日前往中央医院急诊部并在隔日确诊。入院前她住在德惠路一带。 第154例是52岁英籍男士,本月6日抵达新加坡,并在今日早上确诊。 第155例则与裕廊SAFRA团拜晚宴感染群有关,曾与第128例接触。是47岁马来西亚籍女性,是工作准证持有者。她此前未到过境外感染重灾区。 第156例是50岁女性永久居民,同样与裕廊SAFRA团拜晚宴感染群有关。…