Friends and supporters of Leong Sze Hian have started to raise funds for his defence case against Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s defamation suit and countersuit on PM Lee for abusing the court process.

Countersuit filed against PM Lee for abusing court process

Leong was earlier sued by PM Lee for defamation over a Facebook share he made with an article from TheCoverage.My. The article claimed that editor-in-chief of investigative journalism platform Sarawak Report (SR) Ms Clare Rewcastle had mentioned Singapore as “one of the key investigation targets, alongside Switzerland and United States” in the 1MDB scandal during an interview with Malaysian media.

In response to earlier media queries, Ms Chang Li Lin, the press secretary to the Prime Minister, confirmed that PM Lee had commenced legal proceedings against Leong for defamation, and said that the matter is in the hands of PM Lee’s lawyers.

“Mr Lee reserves the right to take legal action against other parties who similarly defame him,” she added.

However, TOC understands that there was no caption written by Leong on the Facebook share.

Lim Tean, who is representing Leong in both suits, announced on Wednesday that he has accepted the case from Leong and said that he is looking forward to cross-examine the PM in court.

Lim wrote, “Mr Leong did not choose to pick a fight, but now offers battle to uphold the freedom of expression in Singapore, a fundamental human right which he has fought tirelessly for more than 2 decades.”

In a statement from the Carson Laws Chamber, it is said that Leong plead that the claim by PM Lee is an abuse of the process of the court and relies upon the same argument for his counterclaim based upon the tort of abuse of civil process.

The statement further states, “Our client invites the court to find that the initiating and pursuit of an unnecessary claim for libel must, therefore, be in order to try to obtain an impermissible collateral advantage, and believes its purpose is to chill freedom of expression ahead of both the trial of Najib Razak and a likely General Election in Singapore next year.”

Lee Hsien Yang contributes to Leong’s legal fund

In response to TOC’s query if he has plans for any fundraising, Leong shared that many have approached him to express their interest to contribute to his legal funds and already some had contributed to it.

Leong told TOC that he hope to see 10,000 people to contribute $1 to his legal funds.

While his target amount will not be sufficient to pay for the legal fees, Leong said, “Singaporeans must let our overpaid Ministers know once and for all, that it does not pay to sue ordinary citizens for defamation. Singaporeans and their children, and their children’s children will never have to fear being sued, for exercising their rights of freedom of expression.”

He  also shared that Mr Lee Hsien Yang, younger brother of PM Lee had contributed to his crowd funding campaign. In response to TOC’s query, Mr Lee Hsien Yang confirmed that he had just contributed to Leong’s legal funds, however, the amount is not revealed.

Mr Lee Hsien Yang and his sister, Dr Lee Weiling had earlier issued a joint statement on 14 June 2017, delivering harsh criticisms of PM Lee, saying that they are disturbed by the character, conduct, motives and leadership of their brother, and the role of his wife, Ho Ching. Alleging that PM Lee had abused his powers and position as PM for personal agenda. In response to the allegations, PM Lee cleared himself in Parliament of any wrong doings and closed the matter without any official investigation.

Public welcome to support Leong

To make his wish happen, Leong has decided to make his accounts public for those keen to support to donate for his legal funds.

For those who wish to contribute to Leong’s legal funds, the details of his accounts are as follow:

Name of account: Leong Sze Hian
POSB Savings: 064064070
Paynow: S0009739Z
Paypal: [email protected]

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

World’s strongest men stunned by female farmer in China

Trending in the Chinese social media network is a photo of a…

遭五名巴士司机起诉 新捷运将纠纷交工业仲裁庭裁决

上月,五名巴士司机分别状告本地巴士业者新捷运(SBS Transit),指责后者违反加班工酬条款,支付不足工酬。 据了解,新捷运已把上述薪资诉讼申请转移到工业仲裁庭(IAC)审理。此前诉方将诉状提呈推事庭聆讯。 在今日发布的声明中,该公司声称“以作为守法和负责任雇主自豪”,和雇员以及国家交通工友联合会(NTWU)都有牢固的劳资关系,并已依循法律义务、相关合约规章行事。 新捷运称,有鉴于上诉巴士司机提出的诉讼,也牵涉该公司与NTWU的共同协议,故此依法、为了新捷运全体巴士车长利益、与NTWU的良好关系,新捷运决定把此纠纷交由工业仲裁庭作裁决。 巴士司机代表律师楼“感惊讶” Carson律师楼律师拉维(M RAVI),上月代表五位巴士司机提呈传讯令状。该律师楼对新捷运把诉讼申请转交工业仲裁庭的举措,“感到惊讶”。 “为尊重法治和法院权限,理应通过法院程序,(如有需要)进行调解”。该律师楼也表示,其客户也是基于所有与雇主和工会的内部协商程序用尽后,才不得已向法院提出诉讼。 这些司机已在该公司任职三至10年不等。诉状中提及其中四名司机,曾向推事庭提呈类似的诉讼。尽管在今年7月和八日,出席了两次与NTWU和康福德高的会谈,不过他们认为控诉和报告未受到重视。 Carson律师楼律师拉维则认为,这五位巴士司机的诉讼具有显著意义,乃是涉及新加坡公交业者的首宗工资争议个案。不仅会影响目前的这五人,还可能对其他新捷运忠于和勤奋工作多年的巴士车长带来影响。 他认为,诉讼中有关可能违反人力部规定的工酬,休假日的争议可能违反《雇佣法》,都理应仔细审视。…

Workers’ Party to construct more infrastructure to improve the safety of residents at HDB Bedok Reservoir Road

In a Facebook post on Monday (30 March), Workers’ Party (WP) chief…

One Raffles Quay South Tower takes precautionary measures after one confirmed case of coronavirus

One Raffles Quay South Tower (ORQ ST) is operating at the “highest…