It was earlier reported that a feud has broken out between some of the hawkers at the new Jurong West Hawker Centre and Koufu’s subsidiary, “Hawker Management Pte Ltd”, the so-called “social enterprise” operator running the hawker centre.

It was first reported by food guru KF Seetoh on his blog last Tuesday (9 Oct). Mr Seetoh did not name the operator but Todayonline did a follow-up story and confirmed that the operator was, indeed, Hawker Management, a subsidiary of public listed company Koufu Group.

On his blog, Mr Seetoh shared some of the unfair high-handed practices adopted by Hawker Management against the hawkers. For example, the operator would penalize the hawker if the hawker quit his stall prematurely, making him pay the remaining months of rentals and fees until a new tenant, subjected to the approval of the operator, is found. The agreement also gives Hawker Management the rights to “at any time” and “from time to time” increase stall rentals and ancillary charges.

To top it all, the hawkers are made to subsidize the tray-return fees. They have to pay on behalf of customers to Hawker Management $0.20 per tray returned by the customers. The customers do not place any deposits for trays used like in other hawker centres. Hawkers end up paying a few hundreds of dollars, sometimes as high as $900, for the tray-return charges alone. This is on top of their monthly rentals and ancillary charges they must pay to Hawker Management.

Forced into a corner, some of the hawkers at Jurong West Hawker Centre decided to come together and sent a petition to NEA, asking the government to intervene. NEA would only say that the hawkers themselves were aware of the charges before signing the agreement with Hawker Management, but promised to look into the matter.

Netizens: At $1,100 for dish washing service, hawkers can hire own dish washer

One hawker gave a breakdown of his costs amounting to some more than $4,000 to Todayonline:

Rent – $2,140
Dish washing – $1,100
Cash machine rental – $300
Tray return – few hundreds but can be as high as $900
Service fee – $250

Sharp-eyed netizens have noticed the high dishwashing charges imposed by Hawker Management on the hawkers. Many commented that at $1,100 per month, the hawkers themselves can actually employ their own dishwashing person.

Hawker Management owned by Koufu Group, is in turn founded by Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC grassroots leader Pang Lim. Koufu in fact, just went public recently in July this year. Mr Pang Lim (PBM), is also the Vice-Chairman of Punggol 21 CC Building Fund Committee as well as Patron of Punggol North CCC and Punggol 21 CCMC.

As a matter of fact, Hawker Management had outsourced its dish washing and table cleaning services to GreatSolutions Pte Ltd, a subsidiary of another public listed company GS Holdings Ltd, founded by Mr Pang Pok. According to disclosure in its annual report, Mr Pang Pok is the brother of Mr Pang Lim.

And the fine prints at the bottom of page 44 further disclosed that Mr Pang Pok’s company would provide “centralised on and off-premise dishwashing and table top cleaning” services to Hawker Management, Mr Pang Lim’s company, at $63,775 per month. An initial 3-year contract was signed between the 2 brothers’ companies in Sep last year.

Pang Lim and Pang Pok are both grassroots leaders in the community

Incidentally, Mr Pang Pok himself is also a grassroots leader.

In the GS Holdings’ annual report, it said, “Mr Pang was awarded the Public Service Medal by the Singapore President’s Office in 2011 and the Long Service Award by the People’s Association in 2013. He also serves as Assistant Treasurer of the Hainan Business Club, Honorary Deputy Treasurer of the Yuying Secondary School Management Committee, Vice Chairman of the Qinghai Association (Singapore) and Vice President of the Guang Wu Club.”

The National Archives also featured “grassroots leader Pang Pok” attending a community reunion dinner with then Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong at Kampong Ubi-Kembangan in 2011. Together with them in a photo were also then MP Ong Seh Hong, Chairman of Kampong Ubi-Kembangan Citizens’ Consultative Committee Teo Cheng Swee, and grassroots leader George Goh.

When the idea of having a centralised dish washing service for hawker centres was first mooted in 2013 by a PAP MP, then Yuhua Hawkers’ Association chairman Karney Ngai countered that the service should be an opt-in one, as it does not lower hawkers’ expenses.

At the time, Ms Ngai told the media, “For those who wash the dishes themselves, it can be difficult to persuade them to pay for something that they are now doing themselves for free… And while most hawkers will not raise their prices, some who cannot absorb the higher costs might.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Increase in defence budget in anticipation of acquiring advanced F-35 stealth fighters

MINDEF said on Friday (18 Jan) that the Republic of Singapore Air…

Young Singaporeans might be ready for an ethnic minority PM, but not the rest of the population, says Heng Swee Keat

While young Singaporeans might be “quite comfortable” with the prospect of being…

李绳武退出藐视法庭诉讼程序 总检察署:躲避回答相关问题

日前,总理李显龙之侄子李绳武称决定不会再继续参与,总检察署起诉他藐视法庭的诉讼程序。总检察署对此回应,表示他这样做是为了避免在宣誓下回答或透露任何相关问题与信息。 本社日前报道,总检察署近期申请撤销李绳武的辩护宣誓书(defence affidavit)中的一些部分,“使之在审讯时不会被纳入考量”。对此,李绳武表示不会再继续参与,总检察署起诉他藐视法庭的诉讼程序。 此外,他也指责总检察署要求上述部分在法庭记录中封存,使之民众不知道被移除的内容是什么。 “这不是单一事件,而是总检察署广泛异常行为的一部分。例如,在上诉庭辩论司法管辖权时,新设立的法庭条例,可以用以回溯追究我。法庭曾认为新条例具追溯力是不公平的。” 对此,总检察署也对李绳武的决定进行回应,发表长达三页的声明。总检察署表示,李绳武这样做有意避免,并以此为“逃脱的借口”,才会决定停止参与法庭诉讼,同时此一决定也清楚显示,他的说法是毫无道理可言。 总检察署续指,若李绳武相信自己的言论并非藐视新加坡司法制度,他就应该继续参与诉讼。 事情缘由与过程 《雅虎新闻》报道,该诉讼起因于2017年7月15日,身为建国总理李光耀孙子、也是现任总理李显龙侄子的李绳武,在脸书贴文批评我国政府“好诉讼” (ligitious),法庭制度“温顺” (pliant),被总检察署指控藐视法庭。 在帖文发布后六天,国家资深律师FrancisNg指该帖文给了新加坡法律制度“令人震惊且毫无根据的攻击”,并要求李绳武签署一份声明,要求他承认虚假指控、藐视司法,并以此道歉。…

选区范围检讨委员会8月1日成立

工人党秘书长暨阿裕尼集选区议员毕丹星,在国会质询总理,究竟选区范围检讨委员会是在八月的什么时候成立? 选举局在9月4日,在官网发布文告,宣布总理已召开成立选区范围检讨委会。但是并没有道明确切的成立日期。 贸工部长陈振声则在昨日代总理李显龙,以书面方式回答毕丹星提问,指上述委会是在8月1日成立。 今年7月,毕丹星曾询问有关委会是否已成立, 惟陈振声当时也代表总理答复,尚未。 今年3月1日,毕丹星曾质问,为何不在上述委会成立后政府自行作出宣布,但陈振声则代总理回答,惯例是让委会专业地进行工作,不受不必要媒体关注或公共压力影响。 事实上,此前在野政治人物张媛容也认为,新加坡人有权通过自由和公平选举,选出人民领导,这也意味着,鉴于群众利益,选区范围检讨委员会什么时候成立,也应立即公告国民。 “在2015年选举前夕,当总理在7月13日在国会受到提问时,才透露选区范围检讨委会已成立,但委会早已成立了两个月。” 在2006年和2011年,选区范围检讨委会用了四个月时间提交报告。但在2015年,从委会公布新的选区地图,到9月1日的提名日,只有39天。 目前,由总理秘书陈基荣担任选区范围检讨委会主席。选举局局长许松岭担任委员会秘书,其他委员包括:建屋发展局局长蔡君炫博士、新加坡土地管理局局长陈文凯和统计局局长王辉锦。