Food guru KF Seetoh from Makansutra wrote an open letter to Senior Minister of State Dr Amy Khor on Tuesday (9 Oct) imploring her to preserve Singapore’s public hawker centres. In essence, Mr Seetoh is against the government appointing a 3rd-party, the so-called “social enterprise” operator, to run publicly funded hawker centres.

In his letter, Mr Seetoh also shared more unfair practices adopted by some of the Social Enterprise Hawker Centre (SEHC) operators against hawkers.

In particular, he highlighted some of the high-handed tactics adopted by one SEHC operator after going through the agreement between the operator and a hawker. The operator would penalize the hawker if the hawker quit his stall half-way, making him pay the remaining months of rent and fees until a new tenant, subjected to the approval of the operator, is found.

The one-sided contract also stated that the operator is entitled to “at any time” and “from time to time” increase stall rentals and ancillary charges. There is little the hawker can do once he signs the agreement.

SEHC operator belongs to Koufu owned by Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC grassroots leader Pang Lim

Yesterday (11 Oct), Todayonline reported that the SEHC involved is actually the new Jurong West Hawker Centre, run by Hawker Management Pte Ltd, a subsidiary of Koufu Group. Koufu in fact, just went public recently in Jul this year. Koufu is founded by Mr Pang Lim (PBM), a grassroots leader at Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC. He is the Vice-Chairman of Punggol 21 CC Building Fund Committee as well as Patron of Punggol North CCC and Punggol 21 CCMC.

Todayonline also reported other dubious tactics employed by the Koufu’s subsidiary, forcing the hawkers to subsidize the tray-return monies. It was reported that hawkers at Jurong West Hawker Centre are the ones paying for patrons to return their trays. In other words, unlike other hawker centres where the patrons would pay a small deposit per tray and get their refunds when they return the trays, the patrons at Jurong West Hawker Centre do not pay for the trays. When they return the trays, they will get $0.20 for each tray. Koufu then charges the hawkers accordingly.

The hawkers said sometimes they even had arguments with patrons over trays due to the tray returning system imposed by Koufu. For example, if a customer uses three trays for three dishes that could be placed on one tray, the stallholder has to fork out 60 cents in total, a hawker pointed out.

One hawker also told Todayonline that they had to pay up to $900 a month for tray charges, on top of the monthly rental and the ancillary charges imposed by Koufu. He gave a breakdown of the costs:

Rent – $2,140
Dish washing – $1,100
Cash machine rental – $300
Tray return – $900
Service fee – $250
Total: $4,690

Furthermore, according to Mr Seetoh, Koufu’s subsidairy would also charge hawkers for contract drafts whenever it updates management terms in the agreement.

Hawkers launch petition but NEA says hawkers aware of charges before signing agreement

Feeling the pinch, some hawkers at Jurong West Hawker Centre have petitioned the National Environment Agency (NEA) for the operator to remove the fee of 20 cents for each returned tray.

The NEA said that it has received “feedback” from some stallholders at Jurong West Hawker Centre. Stallholders were “aware of the charges involved before signing the (tenancy) agreement” with Hawker Management, said a spokesperson from NEA.

The agency has asked Hawker Management to work with the stallholders to address any concerns on this matter. It added that effective tray-return systems make the cleaning of tables easier and faster, which is beneficial to both customers and stallholders.

In the contract, indeed, it is stated that stallholders must take part in the “tray return with incentive system implemented by the landlord”, where the tenant “shall pay S$0.20 / tray issued to the tray cleaning contractor at the point of issuance”:

Koufu’s subsidiary, in reply to Todayonline, said the tray return system was a joint effort by stallholders and the management.

“The initiative was implemented to achieve two objectives — to collectively encourage customers to return their used trays and thereby creating a cleaner and more comfortable environment; and to increase productivity within the hawker centre and provide more affordable food options for the community,” it added.

NEA said it is looking into the matter.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Minister Chan says S’pore ‘intangible strengths’ offers opportunities in a less connected world; Netizens still bring up his confusion between cotton and sheep

Even in a more protectionist and less connected world, Singapore can still…

新西兰总理阿尔登宣布暂时冻结议员涨薪

去年8月,新西兰总理阿尔登(Jacinda Ardern)宣布一项重要决策-暂时冻结国会议员涨薪,直到完成审查薪资体系。她表示,该项决策获几乎所有议员支持。 新西兰国会议员薪资一向由独立运作的薪资委员会决定当年的薪资调整,原预计于去年8月针对国会议员薪资进行调整,然而阿尔登却否决了薪资委员会的意见,认为调整三巴仙的涨幅实在太高,并认为这是“令人无法接受”。 为此,阿尔登内阁亦决定不采纳国会薪资委员会涨幅意见,直至明年6月底前。 阿尔登表示,“鉴于国会议员的一般薪资范围内的最高标准,因此不应再获得加薪。我们身为执政政府,一直以来,都想要弥合人民与政府间的差距。“ 阿尔登续指,“期间,希望能让委员会想出一个具“更公平性”的调薪方案, “。 由于新西兰现行法律禁止政治人物干涉薪资委员会所做的决定,议员将尽速通过法案,让限制薪资涨幅的决定于法有据。 纽西兰议员高薪制度向来备受争议 目前总理阿尔登的年薪高达纽币47万元(约41.7万新元),是其他经济合作发展组织(OECD)会员国当中,年薪排名第五名的国家领袖,还未加上其他额外补贴。阿尔登在宣布冻涨薪资后,估计将在这期间损失约1万4000纽币。 其余的议员薪资如大多数的内阁部长年薪则约纽币28万8900元(25万6214新元)。根据新西兰统计局发布的数据换算,截至2018年6月底,新西兰的年薪中位数为纽币5万1844元(约4万5963新元),两者差距相当悬殊。 《风传媒》报道,纽西兰政府官员高薪制度一直以来颇受争议,其高薪制度一度引发起罢工,包括教师、护理师等重要行业都曾罢工示威。…

苏睿勇拒绝调停献议 要求田径总会道歉

马拉松名将苏睿勇拒绝新加坡田径总会提出的调停会面献议,并点名后者撤回言论,并发书面道歉。 田径总会于周二(13日)透过律师回复苏睿勇,要求调停纷争,提议双方会面进行协商,然而苏睿勇于昨日(14日)拒绝田总的提议,表明田总尚未针对“暂时封锁所有与他的联系”进行澄清。 “直至田总针对评论提出实质性的回应,我们的客户(苏睿勇)才会考虑和田总会面,相信到时的会面会更具有意义和富有成果。” 苏睿勇的律师代表回应。 对此,《海峡时报》记者询问苏睿勇,后者表示只有在田总和奥委会给出回应,他才会接受调停。他表示,“如果你公开指责某人,你要么提出实质证据,要么道歉(若没有根据),你不会在公开对某人人格谋杀,在造成伤害后要求和对方关起门来默默地处理事情。只有在田总和其执行董事解释所有缘由,方能进行调停。” 今日(15日)苏睿勇也转贴《海峡时报》报道,促请田径总会与其执行董事Malik Aljunied出面解释。 苏睿勇近日因东南亚运动会落选而与新加坡国家奥林匹克委员会(SNOC),以及新加坡田径总会(SA)争执,奥委会指出苏睿勇作为国家代表和青年运动员的典范,却表现出“不符合该委会期望的态度和行为”,同时新加坡田径总会表示已“暂时”把苏睿勇封锁在总会的聊天群组和社媒平台外,包括whatsapp、脸书、推特和Instagram等,避免后者在这些平台发文,带来负面影响。 对此,苏睿勇于8月7日向两协会发律师信函,指控他们在未举办任何听证会或给他辩护的机会, 并要求两人于8月13日下午5点前给出具体解释,详细解释“行为失当”的指控 翌日,奥委会透过律师回复苏睿勇并向苏睿勇提出两项要求:1. 他们将在“下周结束前“回复苏睿勇的问题;2.…

Wheel of fortune?

Officials in Singapore have changed the direction of the world’s biggest observation…