Howard Lee & Benjamin Cheah /

“Hi, are you a resident of Potong Pasir?”

“No no no…”

You would be surprised at the number of people who are not Potong Pasir residents, but happen to be in Potong Pasir, when we dropped in for this article on a rainy Sunday morning.

Or perhaps we looked like a couple of sneaky insurance salesmen. But giving away that we were from TOC did get us a few smiles and some answers to two questions that we had: “What changes do residents of Potong Pasir wish to see in their town?” and “What do they hope that their new Member of Parliament can do for them?”

The questions were the result of a nagging suspicion that, for all that the candidates have promised Potong Pasir residents during the recent general elections, they might not really have got to the root of their interests and wishes. And judging from the responses we received from our quick ground poll, in some ways, we may be right.

Fix it where it is worth

If there was one common theme that ran through the responses of all the people who responded to our questions, it was a strong desire for the town council to get the basics right. The key area of contention: installing lifts on every floor of the public housing blocks.

“(We want) lifts on every floor,” said Mr Tai, 19. “If you look around this area, most of the residents are quite old.”

His brother, 17, also agreed, and was disappointed that the Singapore People’s Party, which held the town council seat for the past 27 years, could not accomplish this; a “five-year promise” that was not fulfilled.

It was apparent that the Tai brothers, while not of voting age, have strong views on what needs to be done for the less fortunate in this town, which might be a reflection of a growing desire for physical change among the residents.

But we may be wrong to think that residents want an overhaul of Potong Pasir. “I hope that things will not change that much,” opined Fazli, 30. “This place is peaceful, happy. We don’t want places that attract attention.”

He was referring to plans by the People’s Action Party’s Sitoh Yih Pin to build shopping centres and a waterfront recreational area at the nearby Kallang River. “I just hope (Sitoh) can maintain the area, make it better for the elderly.”

Promises made, promises kept?

If anything, it might seem that the PAP was voted in as a test to see if it can really fulfill what the SPP had promised but, according to some residents, had fallen short.

Ms Chua, 53, replied tersely to our questions: “If Sitoh Yih Pin delivers, then it is okay.”

Others were less optimistic. Albeit being in a position of bias, Mr Ramesh, 48 and an SPP grassroots member, had difficulties trusting Sitoh to do the job right. “All the town council staff were fired,” he said, referring to the recent incident where Sitoh allegedly went back on his word to the Chiams. “I have no confidence in him. Mr Chiam, what he has promised, he (has done his best to) deliver.”

Somewhere among the sentiments, we sensed a certain tiredness among the residents; it has been a long 27 years being this model of holding out against the temptations of upgrading for the vague honour of being the cornerstone of Singapore democracy.

One resident, perhaps in his late forties, who did not want to be named, offered a glimpse into this psyche: “The rest is up to Aljunied – we have done our part.”

Was there a spirit of resilience among the residents to defend the fierce democratic reputation of Potong Pasir? Is it still there? Wilfred Leung, in our earlier interview leading up to the general elections, said that Potong Pasir residents were voters who were beyond their time.

Our sense is that there is still a certain spark, but pragmatism could have taken over many, and the decision to turn their neighbourhood for the better was not an easy one to make.

We can’t blame them for taking a calculated risk. Neither should we see it as a failure of SPP, nor the confident success of PAP in recapturing the seat. The truth is, there is still some misinterpretation of what Potong Pasir residents really want to make it their kind of town, and a forward-looking one at that. By all counts, both parties still have a long way to go.

Read Part 1 HERE.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Eight items as gifts for Singapore’s Jubilee babies

Parents of Singapore’s Jubilee babies born in 2015 can look forward to…

PM Lee visits girl who had her right hand crushed

Post by Lee Hsien Loong. Injured 14-year-old Tan Li Xuan, who had…

工作量增倍却取消花红 马国邮差雨天坐地痛哭诉心酸

在疫情蔓延之际,许多行业领域都面临着巨大的挑战,甚至是倒闭的可能,然而仍需维持运作的非递送服务行业莫属。无论是送餐员或是邮寄递送,工作量都大增。马国一名邮差因工作量增加不少,却始终无法获得花红,而坐在雨中路边伤心哭泣。 一名马国网友日前在脸书上分享有关邮差的故事,据他描述,当时该邮差向他递送包裹,包裹交手后邮差接了一通电话,随后便坐在门口哭泣。 当时正值下雨,邮差也因此全身湿透,原先网友以为他正处于失恋,于是让自己的弟弟上前关心。一开始邮差向他透露没事,但在再三询问下,才得知原来朋友来电,表明公司今年没有分派花红。 “去年他还得到了1000元的花红,但今年却什么都没有了,而且今年已经增加了很多工作量,却得不到花红。“ 他在向网友透露后便抱头痛哭,邮差说,花红对他而言相当重要,因为3年前他父亲离世,为了撑起整个家,他必须要还完家中的贷款包括摩托车贷款、房租等等开销, “每个月的工资只有1千多令吉(约3百多元新元),我真的很需要这笔花红。” 对此,网友也为邮差打抱不平,称派发的花红应该要比去年更多,而不是取消。 “难道行管期间快递包裹没有增多吗?假设包裹增多,不就表示赚得更多吗?何况现在油价降低,那为什么没有派发花红给员工?” 网友认为公司不应以冠病19 为借口,而且在行动管制令(MCO)期间,客户反而增倍,所以不应该就此取消花红。 帖文一出立即引起网民热议。截至目前,已获得逾6万按赞、逾2万评论及分享。不少网民在帖文留言,在病毒爆发期间,也就只有前线人员苦苦撑着,不应该牺牲他们的花红,也有希望马国邮政公司能针对事件给予回应。

【选举】工人党拿下盛港集选区!

工人党何廷儒、蔡庆威、林志蔚和辣玉莎,成功拿下盛港集选区,行动党原总理公署部长黄志明、原交通部兼卫生部高级政务部长蓝彬明医生、原内政部兼卫生部高级政务次长安宁·阿敏落马。 工人党团队得票率52.13巴仙(6万0136张),行动党得票仅47.87巴仙。 盛港集选区结合榜鹅东单选区、盛港西单选区,以及白沙—榜鹅集选区的部分。该选区有12万零166人。